Jump to content

Iglesias signs with O's


weams

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yep, could be.    Or, another guy who emerges this spring.  

Hancock is a bit of a concern,  with his previous injury and still being really young,

I dont follow college ball, but it appears this draft has a decent amount of guys, but nobody that just stands out over the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

Obviously things will change before the Draft in June, but I like the idea of taking Emerson Hancock. A 2023 rotation with Grayson Rodriguez, DL Hall, and Emerson Hancock has potential to be pretty good.

I'm pretty optimistic about Gunnar Henderson - time will tell if he can stick at shortstop.

That rotation sounds great to me, but people need to realize that’s 2023 with a rookie rotation. If not rookie, real close to it. We’re far away. Haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The min salary is $563,500 next year. So we’re paying $2.4ish million to have really good defense at SS. That’s a pretty good deal. 

This reminds me of when we signed Cesar Izturis. In fact the contract is basically the same,

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story?id=3772759&src=desktop

I think our defense takes a big step forward this year with Iglesias at SS, Hays in CF, and Severino likely being being the “starting” Catcher. 

11-years ago, though. So I’d say this is less money relative to league environments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The min salary is $563,500 next year. So we’re paying $2.4ish million to have really good defense at SS. That’s a pretty good deal. 

This reminds me of when we signed Cesar Izturis. In fact the contract is basically the same,

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story?id=3772759&src=desktop

I think our defense takes a big step forward this year with Iglesias at SS, Hays in CF, and Severino likely being being the “starting” Catcher. 

Severino is a horrible defensive catcher.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That rotation sounds great to me, but people need to realize that’s 2023 with a rookie rotation. If not rookie, real close to it. We’re far away. Haha

If any of the pitchers are special, they don't need long to be good.  Mussina was excellent right away, even Bedard was a 4-win pitcher by his third year (only with us four seasons).  We just haven't had that in so long it feels impossible.  As long as Hall and Rodriguez keep their health, they have a fair shot to challenge matching Mountcastle's AAA MVP. next year.  And if they progress well, I can't think of many examples of Top 30-ish MLB-wide pitching prospects being held to full AAA seasons.  Even the Rays used Moore in 2011 and Price in 2008.

Back on Iglesias, I'd known he was a contact-oriented hitter but hadn't realized it's gone as far as he's been amongst the five toughest to strike out MLB-wide a few times.  Cincinnati's park may have tempted him to swing a little harder last year as he was just Top 20ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

If any of the pitchers are special, they don't need long to be good.  Mussina was excellent right away, even Bedard was a 4-win pitcher by his third year (only with us four seasons).  We just haven't had that in so long it feels impossible.  As long as Hall and Rodriguez keep their health, they have a fair shot to challenge matching Mountcastle's AAA MVP. next year.  And if they progress well, I can't think of many examples of Top 30-ish MLB-wide pitching prospects being held to full AAA seasons.  Even the Rays used Moore in 2011 and Price in 2008.

Back on Iglesias, I'd known he was a contact-oriented hitter but hadn't realized it's gone as far as he's been amongst the five toughest to strike out MLB-wide a few times.  Cincinnati's park may have tempted him to swing a little harder last year as he was just Top 20ish.

...then why is is his OBP so pathetic? I'm not knocking him, but let's call a spade a spade. He's a great defensive player (which will be great for our young pitchers), but well below average offensively. To the point where if/when his defense slips a bit he's probably going to have a hard time finding a MLB job. He's perfect for this team but he's going to contribute little to nothing offensively and there's very little chance of him flipping him via trade. He's simply a cheap, affordable, stable defensive presence for us for the next two seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...then why is is his OBP so pathetic? I'm not knocking him, but let's call a spade a spade. He's a great defensive player (which will be great for our young pitchers), but well below average offensively. To the point where if/when his defense slips a bit he's probably going to have a hard time finding a MLB job. He's perfect for this team but he's going to contribute little to nothing offensively and there's very little chance of him flipping him via trade. He's simply a cheap, affordable, stable defensive presence for us for the next two seasons. 

Just because a guy doesn't strike out a lot doesn't mean he takes a lot of walks or makes a lot of quality contact.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...then why is is his OBP so pathetic? I'm not knocking him, but let's call a spade a spade. He's a great defensive player (which will be great for our young pitchers), but well below average offensively. To the point where if/when his defense slips a bit he's probably going to have a hard time finding a MLB job. He's perfect for this team but he's going to contribute little to nothing offensively and there's very little chance of him flipping him via trade. He's simply a cheap, affordable, stable defensive presence for us for the next two seasons. 

He didn’t walk much.  His stats are pretty similar to Alberto last season.  Both scored 62 runs and he had 54 RBIs to Albertos 51. Same amount of doubles.  Triples and home runs similar. 3 to 2 and 11 to 12.  20 BB to 16 BB.  
 

Also only 3 players on Orioles scored more than 62 runs last season and 1 of them is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Bubble Buddy said:

That deal looks really affordable for a guy with Iglesias' reputation (at least around here). Looking closer, I always assumed he was a defensive wizard, yet he's only had a WAR above 2 once. ?

Defensive metrics are not a good touchstone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...then why is is his OBP so pathetic? I'm not knocking him, but let's call a spade a spade. He's a great defensive player (which will be great for our young pitchers), but well below average offensively. To the point where if/when his defense slips a bit he's probably going to have a hard time finding a MLB job. He's perfect for this team but he's going to contribute little to nothing offensively and there's very little chance of him flipping him via trade. He's simply a cheap, affordable, stable defensive presence for us for the next two seasons. 

His OBP is not that bad.    Median team  OBP for SS last year was .317, Iglesias was .318.     Not saying he’s a world-beater but I wouldn’t say his OBP is “pathetic.”   His bigger problem is his lack of power, even for a SS.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • After going back and reading the draft day thread on Holliday,  I don't know if I would have the stomach to trade either one of those 3. I had the opportunity to watch Elijah Green this past week play in low A, and it reminded me of how fortunate it is to be an O's fan right now. 
    • 320M and they need a pitcher.  I think they wasted a dime somewhere.
    • But don't we need to get rid of the previous dogma - we need to spend when we're good to win?  It has nothing to do with Angelos or anything else along those lines.  If anything, my question is - knowing how good we are now, and having proven it, how can we maintain the guys that are still in the audition phase of the ascension to the bigs, without paying too high get some help now.  It's not like they're failing. I just think Elias might be thinking stop gap, not the main aisle deals.  I'm fine with that, but it seems like many just want him to give stuff away to get something big right now, and I don't think I agree with that - and I kind of hope Elias doesn't either, to be honest. Rubes will spend money, but after Angelos, it still won't be enough for some.  He doesn't need to prove he will by signing off on the trade of a top player/prospect.  I would be completely satisfied with an announcement that they had reached a long term agreement with Adley or Gunnar right now.  But I'm not waiting for Rubes to prove himself and trust that all I've seen from him so far is that he will differentiate himself from the previous ownership in a meaningful and real way - like he already has, in some ways, when his and the team's time is right.
    • It would be Basallo for me, but the upside is so massive that voting for him makes me cringe. It's pretty simple: Don't. Trade. Any. Of. Them. 
    • I think the Tigers would run to the phone to call the commissioners office if they could get Holliday for Skubal
    • I'm sure Dodger fans aren't like that.  I expect they're like Yankee fans and would like to buy/trade for all the best players.  Dodgers are actually way scarier to compete against than the Yankees they are probably the wealthiest team in the majors and run like a small market franchise in that they are trying to exploit market inefficiencies and never waste a dime.
    • I disagree with all possible votes, it is slanted. The O’s are stacked and it’s likely they add a piece or two. If this was the Dodgers, we would be hailing the off-season moves and pushing for the next big move. And the Orioles keep winning, better!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...