Jump to content

Kjerstad comes in at #99 on BA Top 100


Sir_Loin

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

How so?

Rob, It wouldn't matter!

2) Its fair to say whatever you want about what you think he will or wont be. I should have the same right. Some guys don't want to say or here anything negative about the Orioles, Elias, Angelos, the draft process, Poor trade return, penny pinching, and just bad decisions.

  • I hated the return for Cashner, the same type issue happened as in this thread
  • I hated that we gave Villar away for little (I don't want to debate it here again)
  • I wasn't impressed with last years draft (Anyone could have made the AR pick)
  • I'm not happy with this draft! (I've rested my case)

Anyone of these subjects have resulted in heated debates!

If he hits .270 w/ 35 Homers and 85+ RBIs he ends up being a very good pick and you could probably be happy even if Martin ends up being Pedroia or something close.

3) It wouldn't matter except the Orioles as recently as a few years ago had a ton of those guys. It resulted in a lot pf games where we couldn't score due to too many guys having high K rates. Thats why I have been an advocate for high AVG/OBP guys.

 

The Orioles haven’t had any of those of those guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

The only problem is there are to many guys here that you have to agree with or else!

My god man, calm down. 

SG is completely correct. I have no problem with your opinion, but you don't necessarily seem open to people with differing opinions yourself and you present things with such certainty when nobody knows what is going to happen. Hell, Austin Martin would probably look at some of the stuff you've posted and think "man, that guy is really confident in me." But whatever, who cares? We'll find out in due time. 

But you just keep shouting at people. Constantly. When things are presented in that way, it's impossible to have useful dialogue. I know...welcome to the internet.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

The Orioles haven’t had any of those of those guys.

Any of what guys ??? High average and OBP or High HR/Ks?

HIGH OBP ... Villar was that guy, at least last year. And he was traded for scraps as an alternative to giving him a new contact.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lovetoaster said:

1) My god man, calm down. 

SG is completely correct. I have no problem with your opinion,

 

 but you don't necessarily seem open to people with differing opinions yourself and you present things with such certainty when nobody knows what is going to happen.

 

2) Hell, Austin Martin would probably look at some of the stuff you've posted and think "man, that guy is really confident in me." But whatever, who cares? We'll find out in due time. 

3) But you just keep shouting at people. Constantly. When things are presented in that way, it's impossible to have useful dialogue. I know...welcome to the internet.  

1) What are you talking about?

I am willing to listen to any opinion from anyone. But, I'm not changing my mind anymore or less than any of the guys that love the draft approach. I just deal with the teaming up since most are on the Elias side of this discussion.

2) What have I said thats so absurd? 

  •      I've said he was the BPA ...Most outlets agreed with me
  •      Another post compared his skill set to Lou Whitaker and I compared him to Pedroia. I think he has a shot to be that type of player. I've openly admitted that 2/3 of the prospects in RD 1 will likely fail. No one knows for sure on any of these guys

3) I'm not shouting at anyone....Just go back and look at the behavior.

 

Poster ..... RT you are not understanding the draft approach    (REP give by 2-3 posters)

RT .....        I get it, But I prefer BPA and think Martin was the BPA

Poster  ..... But, Kjerstad is in a bucket of 5 players with Martin that were ranked really close (Rep by 2-3 posters)

RT .... I don't agree that they were that close  (Bad REP from a guy who never posts)

Poster ..... I trust Elias that he took the BPA and like the way the draft went (REP, REP , REP)

RT .....       He went cheap with the 1st round selection in order to draft the High School kids in round 4/5 and give them 1+ million each

Poster .... Cant you see that Elias like Kjerstad better?

RT ..... I believe he did it for the the savings. I believe he likes Kjerstad but I don't believe that he believes Kjertsad is the better propsect. Here is an article that quotes him as saying money savings wasn't the only reason

Poster..... Why can't you get it that its a great strategy ...He drafted the better player and two guys with high upside (rep. rep, rep)

 

***** I know you think Im exaggerating ...But go back and read the whole thread *******

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

The only problem is there are to many guys here that you have to agree with or else!

I believe they would simply go get a beer with you if you offered. They'd like you too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Maybe this thread would have been more productive if it went more like this:

Kjerstad is #99 on the BA list.

Yep, Martin is higher, wish they'd taken him instead.

Well, the strategy was to take the cheaper player so the overall draft class might be stronger.

Sure, but I'm not convinced it'll work out.

Yea, nobody really is.

Wanna get a beer? 

Sure.

One of the best posts I've seen in awhile, and I don't drink beer (or alcohol at all). :D☝️

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Any of what guys ??? High average and OBP or High HR/Ks?

HIGH OBP ... Villar was that guy, at least last year. And he was traded for scraps as an alternative to giving him a new contact.

 

You said they had many of those players, with reference to my description of Kjerstad.

They haven’t had 260/330/550, 35 homer, high K players.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

The only problem is there are to many guys here that you have to agree with or else!

You are absolutely correct!! I posted about this earlier in this thread. Unfortunately, you can be one of those posters. I respect your arguments but, you seem (at least to me) to have a need to "win" a discussion. We are all usually talking in opinion and the hypothetical. There is no "winning." 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

You are absolutely correct!! I posted about this earlier in this thread. Unfortunately, you can be one of those posters. I respect your arguments but, you seem (at least to me) to have a need to "win" a discussion. We are all usually talking in opinion and the hypothetical. There is no "winning." 

lCryWU7.gif

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

You are absolutely correct!! I posted about this earlier in this thread. Unfortunately, you can be one of those posters. I respect your arguments but, you seem (at least to me) to have a need to "win" a discussion. We are all usually talking in opinion and the hypothetical. There is no "winning." 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I mean more notable for anything. It's been around 60 years and you don't even have a State Senator or CEO to crow about?
    • If Mayo and Holliday are here next year, one of them most certainly has to move to the OF. There is only one position available. Henderson, Westburg, and Mountcastle are all starting caliber INFs. For a team who is trying to win a WS (like I assume the goal will be again next season) I don't see the wisdom in introducing too much possible volatility at one time due to the variance in performance that young players (first time big leaguers can produce). To have a lineup where Holliday, Mayo, (Kjerstad and Norby for that matter) are all trying to acclimate/figuring out how to hit big league pitching all at the same time does not seem like a wise move and it definitely doesn't seem like something Elias would do. I'm not sure that I see this is a move that would be ultra-risky or a move that would be for a rebuilding team. We are obviously going to be in the postseason and we could go all the way. If we were to turn around after a successful season and then jettison all vets and go with a rebuild lineup with half or more being occupied with young players prospects, I think it would come with a lot of negative PR and most likely a negative fan reaction. Teams who are successful and have young stars/cornerstone players under multiple years of control/contract (Rutschman, Henderson) don't typically decide to rebuild/reset in the midst of that. That could be detrimental to the teams bottom line and that would be a hard sell to an owner who has just taken over the team.
    • Yes, Boras clients occasionally sign extensions.  No, Boras won’t prevent a client that wants to sign an extension from doing so.  Yes, Boras clients sign fewer pre-FA extensions than clients of other agencies (based on comparing his share of pre-FA extensions vs. his larger share of MLB players). That’s because of either the advice he gives, attracting clients with a similar philosophy, or both. Scott has never signed a player with less than two years of service time to a long-term extension.  He has only signed 1 pre-arb player to a long-term extension which was 13 years ago (Carlos Gonzalez). Expectations of signing Gunnar or Westburg to extensions need to be calibrated against this reality.  
    • A.J. Preller is apparently a good talent evaluator and an aggressive GM.   I get the feeling he thinks they can keep replacing prospects through the draft and J2 signings.   He’s kind of painted himself into a corner with the current team.  He traded for Arráez.   The Padres were already rumored to be interested in Crochet.  I wouldn’t put it past Heller.  Of course, Crochet isn’t a rental so it’s not quite selling your soul to the devil to trade an Ethan Salas for him.  Not sure what else they have to offer.
    • I didn't really know either until the news of his death, which was kind of a lightbulb moment for me in relation to the extreme all-in approach the Padres had been taking in recent years. The family has kept a lot of details private, but from reading a couple of the articles after he passed, he had already gone through a couple of different tough cancer fights and it was known around the industry that his health was tenuous. I don't know if he got a specific prognosis before the end, but it seems clear that he wasn't taking any time for granted and wanted to push to make things happen while he could. It's not really relevant for the O's, but it has come up now and then when some folks start asking why the O's couldn't try to spend like the Padres - it's clear now that the Padres were in a unique situation.
    • No, but my family should get a good dose.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...