Jump to content

Reddit- Umpires have heavily favored Orioles opponents this season


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, now said:

And 10 runs = 1 win, right, theoretically? So it has made a difference, of 1 win.

Well, that’s a rough average.   Just like a team’s Pythagorean record won’t usually match its actual record exactly, the ten runs per win is an estimate because it depends when those runs are scored.  Timing is everything in life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
11 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

This seems to fit here.

Sure wish the O's had a decent framing catcher in the system.

33305dwkgv371.png

I commented about the correlation when you originally posted.  It seems pretty obvious to me that there should be some correlation to calls/framing.  

But I still don't know how significant the impact is to wins/losses.  Either way.  Nice visual to the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, foxfield said:

I commented about the correlation when you originally posted.  It seems pretty obvious to me that there should be some correlation to calls/framing.  

But I still don't know how significant the impact is to wins/losses.  Either way.  Nice visual to the discussion.

Looks like about 25 runs or 2-3 wins between the Orioles and Rangers.  But it looks like about a win separating most teams if you discount 2-3 outliers.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Russell Martin's move to the Pirates, replacing Ryan Doumit was worth, if I remember correctly, about 150 runs, about .23 per 100 pitches. Thats significant.  That makes a real difference in outcomes.

They’ve changed the way they weight the metrics on catcher framing numerous times over the years.   There’s no way I believe changing catchers adds or subtracts 150 runs.   The Pirates allowed 97 fewer runs the year Russell arrived,  but I don’t even accept that all of that was due to the catcher.   Except for Burnett, they had an entirely new rotation the year Martin arrived.   

Fangraphs has Doumit at -16.4, then Martin +16.5 the next year.   A difference of 33 runs.   That, I can believe.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

They’ve changed the way they weight the metrics on catcher framing numerous times over the years.   There’s no way I believe changing catchers adds or subtracts 150 runs.   The Pirates allowed 97 fewer runs the year Russell arrived,  but I don’t even accept that all of that was due to the catcher.   Except for Burnett, they had an entirely new rotation the year Martin arrived.   

Fangraphs has Doumit at -16.4, then Martin +16.5 the next year.   A difference of 33 runs.   That, I can believe.   
 

Fangraphs has Doumit at -63 framing runs in 2008.  In about 100 games caught.  That's like taking a league-average pitcher with a 4.00 ERA in 150 innings and replacing him with a pitcher with a 7.80.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

They’ve changed the way they weight the metrics on catcher framing numerous times over the years.   There’s no way I believe changing catchers adds or subtracts 150 runs.   The Pirates allowed 97 fewer runs the year Russell arrived,  but I don’t even accept that all of that was due to the catcher.   Except for Burnett, they had an entirely new rotation the year Martin arrived.   

Fangraphs has Doumit at -16.4, then Martin +16.5 the next year.   A difference of 33 runs.   That, I can believe.   
 

I can believe that.  I was trying to remember what I had read in the book about those pirates teams and that was written 5 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • After going back and reading the draft day thread on Holliday,  I don't know if I would have the stomach to trade either one of those 3. I had the opportunity to watch Elijah Green this past week play in low A, and it reminded me of how fortunate it is to be an O's fan right now. 
    • 320M and they need a pitcher.  I think they wasted a dime somewhere.
    • But don't we need to get rid of the previous dogma - we need to spend when we're good to win?  It has nothing to do with Angelos or anything else along those lines.  If anything, my question is - knowing how good we are now, and having proven it, how can we maintain the guys that are still in the audition phase of the ascension to the bigs, without paying too high get some help now.  It's not like they're failing. I just think Elias might be thinking stop gap, not the main aisle deals.  I'm fine with that, but it seems like many just want him to give stuff away to get something big right now, and I don't think I agree with that - and I kind of hope Elias doesn't either, to be honest. Rubes will spend money, but after Angelos, it still won't be enough for some.  He doesn't need to prove he will by signing off on the trade of a top player/prospect.  I would be completely satisfied with an announcement that they had reached a long term agreement with Adley or Gunnar right now.  But I'm not waiting for Rubes to prove himself and trust that all I've seen from him so far is that he will differentiate himself from the previous ownership in a meaningful and real way - like he already has, in some ways, when his and the team's time is right.
    • It would be Basallo for me, but the upside is so massive that voting for him makes me cringe. It's pretty simple: Don't. Trade. Any. Of. Them. 
    • I think the Tigers would run to the phone to call the commissioners office if they could get Holliday for Skubal
    • I'm sure Dodger fans aren't like that.  I expect they're like Yankee fans and would like to buy/trade for all the best players.  Dodgers are actually way scarier to compete against than the Yankees they are probably the wealthiest team in the majors and run like a small market franchise in that they are trying to exploit market inefficiencies and never waste a dime.
    • I disagree with all possible votes, it is slanted. The O’s are stacked and it’s likely they add a piece or two. If this was the Dodgers, we would be hailing the off-season moves and pushing for the next big move. And the Orioles keep winning, better!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...