Jump to content

2022 early look top prospects


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

You don’t draft for need in baseball…ever.

I would almost rather draft for need than this goofy underslot strategy.  If Jones didn't look like the best player available and there was a high school SS who projected as a decent possibility to be an All Star SS at the ML level, I would pick the SS over Jones if they were looked at as equal prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, btdart20 said:

As my aunt would say “stop yourself!”  Clearly it can happen and does happen. But large market teams give huge contracts to the most talented players for a reason.  That’s why we compare contract value to player WAR and how profits are made in the economic margins.  Statistics help decisions for the future.  But they aren’t determinant of what will happen.

Well, I think it’s hard to say what the formula is to win a WS.    And the superstars aren’t always guys who were obvious superstars on draft day.  

I think we shouldn’t overthink this.   The pick has to balance ceiling with probability of reaching that ceiling.   You go with the higher ceiling unless there’s someone else who’s close and has a much better shot at reaching his ceiling.   That approach seems to favor Jones, if you believe what the majority of pundits seem to be saying/reporting.  Of course, as I keep saying, we don’t know if Elias’ evaluation of these players and their ceilings jibes with the majority pundit view.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

The Braves won the WS with their game changing generational talent not playing.

You can get there any number of ways.

Freddie, Dansby, Ozzie and Riley are dudes that win big games too. You need several dudes. Injuries happen, yep. That’s why you need several. And yes, there are different formulas to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of have a funny feeling that Termarr is gonna be the pick and we get a decent savings on him. I believe he still hasn’t committed to a college and seems to have zero intention of doing so. Also, he doesn’t have the same hype he had this winter. I could see a deal being worked out. And quite frankly, I’d love it.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, joelala said:

I kind of have a funny feeling that Termarr is gonna be the pick and we get a decent savings on him. I believe he still hasn’t committed to a college and seems to have zero intention of doing so. Also, he doesn’t have the same hype he had this winter. I could see a deal being worked out. And quite frankly, I’d love it.  

I'm not a big fan of taking a likely 2B at #1.  Do you think his bat is that elite?  I'm not a defensive expert, but some posters here think the O's don't have any legitimate MLB SS prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, joelala said:

I kind of have a funny feeling that Termarr is gonna be the pick and we get a decent savings on him. I believe he still hasn’t committed to a college and seems to have zero intention of doing so. Also, he doesn’t have the same hype he had this winter. I could see a deal being worked out. And quite frankly, I’d love it.  

I have a funny feeling I have no idea who the pick is going to be.   On my surpised meter, Johnson would be pretty high up there.   I think it's between Jones, Green, and Lee but I'm not even sure about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm not a big fan of taking a likely 2B at #1.  Do you think his bat is that elite?  I'm not a defensive expert, but some posters here think the O's don't have any legitimate MLB SS prospects. 

Yea I mean it depends if we agree that the bat is as ‘generational’ as some scouts are saying it is. I’ve also heard he has an excellent make up and great work ethic. In principal though I’d be totally fine with a second baseman at #1 if he could be a perennial all star and would sign under-slot  

 

42 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I have a funny feeling I have no idea who the pick is going to be.   On my surpised meter, Johnson would be pretty high up there.   I think it's between Jones, Green, and Lee but I'm not even sure about that.

 

Fine, let me rephrase: the pick could make sense for us as a pretty high upside bat who would take an underslot deal. I’m no fortune teller either. I like him better than Lee but that may just be my own personal bias as I’ve listened to some interviews with him and am just really rooting for him. I’d be happy with anyone of those guys except Lee, quite frankly. I also like Collier. That swing is smoooth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, joelala said:

Yea I mean it depends if we agree that the bat is as ‘generational’ as some scouts are saying it is. I’ve also heard he has an excellent make up and great work ethic. In principal though I’d be totally fine with a second baseman at #1 if he could be a perennial all star and would sign under-slot  

 

 

Fine, let me rephrase: the pick could make sense for us as a pretty high upside bat who would take an underslot deal. I’m no fortune teller either. I like him better than Lee but that may just be my own personal bias as I’ve listened to some interviews with him and am just really rooting for him. I’d be happy with anyone of those guys except Lee, quite frankly. I also like Collier. That swing is smoooth. 

I think if it's not Jones or Green, and they decide to go underslot that Lee more fits their profile type of player.     Lee's profile is similar to Johnson's actually.   They both have plus hit tools, both are playing SS but more likely wind up to 2B (Lee also profiles at 3B), with average speed.   Johnson might have a little more power potential but I don't think it's a signifcant difference.   The biggest difference is that Lee is a more proven commodity.   It would be a huge surprise to me if they took Johnson over Lee.   Not a huge surprise if they took Jones or Green over Lee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joelala said:

I kind of have a funny feeling that Termarr is gonna be the pick and we get a decent savings on him. I believe he still hasn’t committed to a college and seems to have zero intention of doing so. Also, he doesn’t have the same hype he had this winter. I could see a deal being worked out. And quite frankly, I’d love it.  

I heard that Termarr’s HS season is over already.   So, no more real opportunities for him to move the needle.   He was my early preference but I’m leaning Jones now just based on the growing pundit consensus.  

I will say this, though: it’s never bothered me that he is likely to be a 2B.   A great hitting 2B is a huge asset.   I close my eyes and I see Joe Morgan.  If I was confident that he was the best hitting prospect in the draft, I’d be happy to have that at 2B.
 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I heard that Termarr’s HS season is over already.   So, no more real opportunities for him to move the needle.   He was my early preference but I’m leaning Jones now just based on the growing pundit consensus.  

I will say this, though: it’s never bothered me that he is likely to be a 2B.   A great hitting 2B is a huge asset.   I close my eyes and I see Joe Morgan.  If I was confident that he was the best hitting prospect in the draft, I’d be happy to have that at 2B.
 

His HS team was so bad, Termarr only got up two times a game. He did not have a great season, apparently. Scouts have begun to question the body type and what lies ahead for him. Will he maintain the bounce he has now? There is no projection left. Will he get bigger in a bad way? I think these questions are what hurt him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

His HS team was so bad, Termarr only got up two times a game. He did not have a great season, apparently. Scouts have begun to question the body type and what lies ahead for him. Will he maintain the bounce he has now? There is no projection left. Will he get bigger in a bad way? I think these questions are what hurt him. 

He has no business being the #1 pick.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
    • Last offseason with John (I am so poor) Angelos still in charge, along with the depth in the upper minor leagues it made sense to make a trade for someone like Burnes.  I don't think Elias should be looking at making a trade this offseason using any of our young talent.  It is time for Rubenstein to open the checkbook and land us a TOR starter and a big bat.  The days of having too many prospects is over, I want to see us have some solid depth options in AAA if we need it.
    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...