Jump to content

Alex Wells 2021


Frobby

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, baltfan said:

They wear masks in softball.  if you started in Little League kids would get used to it by the time they got to the majors.  it used to be that no one wore faceguards on batting helmets.  When I went to the Orioles game with the new nets I wondered why I had been so against them.  You may be right, but I could definitely see facemasks being more tenable than some sort of helmet.  

We live in a very risk adverse country, so who knows? And not all young ladies wear that mask, only those risk adverse ones. I was watching the softball World Series and none of the pitchers were wearing masks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

6/9 - Solid start from Wells tonight.

5IP, 3H, 1R, 0BB, 5K.

64 pitches through 5 innings, 44 strikes.  

In June he's pitched 9 innings allowing 1 run (a solo homer) and 0 walks while striking out 10.

Starting to look more like the Wells we know and love.

The problem i have is trying to find a current successful major league with similar stuff.  

Looking at baseball savant, Kwang Hyun Kim is a fairly close comp to Wells FB (87-89), curve (72), slider (79-81) and hard straight change but really no one else. I'm going to watch some video of Kim at a later time and see if they pitch similarly.

Wells got a lot of swing and miss on that below average velocity FB up in the zone last night, but not sure that works in the MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree Tony, that's always been the question.   I'm just glad to see him put up back-to-back good outings after a terrible start.

I think give him another 4-5 starts or so at AAA and if he consistently is putting up results, bring him up and see what he's got.  No better time to try than now, and he's not a guy in which service clock time is an issue.  I'm bearish on him but would like to see him earn a shot.

Of course I'm putting the cart before the horse just a bit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

The problem i have is trying to find a current successful major league with similar stuff.  

Looking at baseball savant, Kwang Hyun Kim is a fairly close comp to Wells FB (87-89), curve (72), slider (79-81) and hard straight change but really no one else. I'm going to watch some video of Kim at a later time and see if they pitch similarly.

Wells got a lot of swing and miss on that below average velocity FB up in the zone last night, but not sure that works in the MLB.

If I'm Wells, or Elias, my bottom line is I need to figure out exactly what profile I have in my arsenal that works in the majors. If he doesn't go there with a good plan that he can execute, the stuff alone will get crushed. Heck, that happens with guys throwing mid-90's. Wells essentially has to pitch like a vet when he gets called up. In, out, up, down, pitching backwards, keeping people totally off balance. 

I'm not sure the stuff is comparable, but he basically needs to arrive able to pitch like a Mark Buehrle. It's a tall order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, orioles22 said:

Good to see him bouncing back. I hope the Orioles don't follow the advice of many on here and avoid rushing him up another level. I could be wrong, but it seemed he had a full season at the past two levels.

I think Wells will get called up sometime in the next month or two.    Hopefully, now that he’s got his land legs, he’ll continue to pitch in the manner that has been successful for him throughout his MiL career.   His stuff isn’t overwhelming but his command is top notch.   He’s on the 40-man roster so he’ll get his shot sooner or later.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think Wells will get called up sometime in the next month or two.    Hopefully, now that he’s got his land legs, he’ll continue to pitch in the manner that has been successful for him throughout his MiL career.   His stuff isn’t overwhelming but his command is top notch.   He’s on the 40-man roster so he’ll get his shot sooner or later.   

Could be. I'd wait until Sept. 1, but I hope he's ready to go whenever it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well is interesting because he's got one of the "invisiball" fastball even though it 88-89. He must have real good true spin because batters swing through it a lot, particularly up in the zone. I just wish his change was better. I'm not a fan of that hard straight change that doesn't have a enough separation of speed from the fastball and not a ton of drop or fade.

I'm no against giving him a shot at some point if he keeps going well. I just can't find any successful comps for him besides Hwang and Hwang gets much more movement on his slider and better velocity difference on the change.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Well is interesting because he's got one of the "invisiball" fastball even though it 88-89. He must have real good true spin because batters swing through it a lot, particularly up in the zone. I just wish his change was better. I'm not a fan of that hard straight change that doesn't have a enough separation of speed from the fastball and not a ton of drop or fade.

I'm no against giving him a shot at some point if he keeps going well. I just can't find any successful comps for him besides Hwang and Hwang gets much more movement on his slider and better velocity difference on the change.

 

Is there any comparison to a JV Greg Maddux? My memory is most of his career Maddux had a sub 90’s fastball, though I certainly remember a plus plus swing and miss change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Returning to Norfolk once again, Wells pitched following a 2 inning stint by newcomer Ryan Hartman, throwing 4.2 scoreless innings, 2 hits, 1 BB, 6 K’s.   He’s been solid in AAA, pitching to a 3.78 ERA, 1.11 WHIP, 8.2 K/9.   But it hasn’t translated to the majors yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Returning to Norfolk once again, Wells pitched following a 2 inning stint by newcomer Ryan Hartman, throwing 4.2 scoreless innings, 2 hits, 1 BB, 6 K’s.   He’s been solid in AAA, pitching to a 3.78 ERA, 1.11 WHIP, 8.2 K/9.   But it hasn’t translated to the majors yet.  

Hindsight is 20/20, I know we had to see what we had, but with all of these SP prospects being fringey, I think we shouldn’t have jerked them up/down so much this season. Most of them steamrolled through AA and now have struggled to even get AAA hitters out this year. 
 

I don’t think we learned anything about the group this year, or at least anything positive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...