Jump to content

Sisco DFA’ed


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

Just now, jamalshw said:

I'm surprised by the DFA, but since my hopes of seeing someone exciting get the 40-man spot are dashed, I'm not hoping the opening in Norfolk at least gets Adley ABs in Triple-A and that much closer to the Majors. 

I don't think AAA is any closer to the majors than AA when it comes to Adley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think anyone predicted a DFA.

Of course he might clear.

Never been a fan but his defense improved and much worse on 40 man, puzzling. 
 

Since the Os DFA-Ed Rodgers, he’s had two great starts in AAA for the Nats. I feel like they cut bait with him way too soon giving his surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think Frobby posted once that a pretty significant group that make the majors spend very little time there.

So a five year (at least) career isn't bad at all.

Put it this way: Sisco was the 61st pick in the draft.   Of the 56 players picked in that spot, only six have had more at bats in the majors than Sisco.   One of those was Josh Bell, who for some reason slipped to 61st but received a $5 mm bonus to sign.    

So, I’d call Sisco a disappointment but not a bust.   
 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Put it this way: Sisco was the 61st pick in the draft.   Of the 56 players picked in that spot, only six have had more at bats in the majors than Sisco.   One of those was Josh Bell, who for some reason slipped to 61st but received a $5 mm bonus to sign.    

So, I’d call Sisco a disappointment but not a bust.   
 

He was an old school overslot guy like you don't see anymore.

Back when an actual first round talent could be pried away from a college commitment by throwing stacks of 100's at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m more surprised of the addition of Thomas Eschelman for the start than I am the DFA of Sisco. Moves like this make me reconsider getting myself invested in following baseball. Eschelman has a 6+ ERA and will completely bomb up here and everyone knows it meanwhile there are other options in the organization who worked hard and have gotten positive results and are being passed over all so that the ML team stays as uncompetitive as possible. It’s one thing to rebuild and intentionally tank in theory but when it’s so obvious that losing is the actual goal and moves are made with the explicit intention of losing it’s just bleh...doesn’t feel good as a fan. It’ll be cool when they’re winning again but this is type of crap is bad for baseball.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Exactly.  I'm not convinced the hitting woes are here to stay because of the personnel involved -- at least not the young personnel.  The hitting fell off for many guys this season who are clearly talented.  We don't know why, but we have to trust the team will get to the bottom of it.  What choice do we have?
    • I’m not up on the latest analytical thinking—I am really not that kind of sports fan anymore—but walks?  I can’t imagine that organizationally they are discounting walks.  Our marquee young players seemed to distinguish themselves in the maturity of their approaches on their scouting reports and in their earlier play even at the major league level.  Contrast that with the last two days where we had like seven or eight Javy Baez’s (or whoever, feel like I’ve seen a lot of clips of that guy hacking at air).  How many high fastballs did they swing through or pop up?  And nobody adjusted.  The Royals had them completely lost and the council of hitting coaches obviously couldn’t fix it.  I don’t know man, everyone’s just regressed.  How many freaking times do you hear how it’s a “game of adjustments” and who really did that well in the second half, let alone the last two games?  They failed at that both macro and micro.
    • I made this comment in another thread, but I think there has to be a serious review within organization of how they are instructing their hitting prospects. We see prospect after prospect come up and struggle mightily. I think it's more than just some bad luck. And there's way too many hitters that are home run or die in this lineup. The Orioles did score a decent amount of runs this year, but this offense is easy to shutdown. Limit the home runs given up and the Orioles will struggle just get on the scoreboard.  The baseball doesn't travel as well when the weather cools and the competition gets better in the postseason. You can't beat up on some .500 or worse pitching staff in the playoffs.
    • Here’s the thing. Just a few months ago I think most were marveling at our development. Adley and Gunnar progressing as you’d hope and Cowser bouncing back in a big way. Westburg emerging as well.  JH and Mayo’s bumpy ride has been disappointing, but I’ll need until the middle of next year to think there’s anything wrong with how we develop hitters. I will say though, I want to see approach adjustments back to 2023. 
    • Gunnar hit 1.288 OPS in the playoffs last year. 
    • Holliday became a professional in 2022, Churio and Merrill became professionals in 2021 so he has a year plus less experience then those guys do.  All the experts say Holliday will be a superstar in time so I will stick with them.  Henderson struggled his 1st year as well and now is a MVP contender.   Witt was drafted in 2019 and made the majors in 2022 so 3 years later.  Holliday was drafted in 2022 and made his debut in 2024.   He was 1 year ahead of them all in professional development.  
    • This is correct.  Just wish the Os had one of those guys. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...