Jump to content

Kyle Bradish 2022


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

That was one terrible post game interview.  Was messing up canned lines and acted like he was was annoyed to be doing an interview.  Doesn’t seem to have much going on upstairs.  He admitted he lost focus in the 4th and became a “fan” watching the offense put up runs.  Pretty frustrating inning.  Hope he bounces back in a big way. 

I know I'm probably in the minority on this but I never watch or listen to interviews from athletes. I'm guessing most of them are not all that interested in talking about what everyone just watched them do... good or bad. 

 

Now, I will listen to sports talk on XM all day long but I tend to tune out when they have an athlete on the phone with them. Heck, I used to watch the same exact Sports center over and over in the morning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

That was one terrible post game interview.  Was messing up canned lines and acted like he was was annoyed to be doing an interview.  Doesn’t seem to have much going on upstairs.  He admitted he lost focus in the 4th and became a “fan” watching the offense put up runs.  Pretty frustrating inning.  Hope he bounces back in a big way. 

He's new.  He hasn't learned to give rehearsed, canned answers to everything.  At least he said he was going to be reviewing video to see what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

Took me awhile to find it:  https://video.masnlivestream.com/video/Kyle Bradish on his rough fourth inning against Twins/2170

 

It's not that bad, IMO.  Not all of these guys are going to be brilliant and engaging in front of the media.  Not all of these guys are going to like answering questions, especially after a bit of struggling.  Maybe there's a little bit of Bedard here, and that's fine.

Which brings me to the best ever Bedard/media exchange:

Bedard:  "I'm only allowing three questions."

Reporter:  "Why only three questions?"

Bedard:  "That's one."

I died.  That was hilarious.

 

Yeah not that bad. It's weird to suddenly have 5 microphones shoved in your face in a confined area when you're 25 and coming off your first bad outing. Nobody wants to do that. He just looked uncomfortable to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't had "top" pitching prospects coming up in years. Since Matusz and Tillman and Britton and Arrieta. I think we forget that there are adjustments and learning curves.

 

The dudes stuff, especially his breaking stuff, looks ELITE. He's "grooving" fastballs when he gets behind in counts. And he was too cute after a 6 run inning that the O's gave him when he just needed to attack after you get 6 runs. The "stuff" has been there, which makes me very exited. He's had plenty of dominant innings. He's just a few pitches bite him. I'm unbelievbly excited from what I've seen so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, emmett16 said:

That was one terrible post game interview.  Was messing up canned lines and acted like he was was annoyed to be doing an interview.  Doesn’t seem to have much going on upstairs.  He admitted he lost focus in the 4th and became a “fan” watching the offense put up runs.  Pretty frustrating inning.  Hope he bounces back in a big way. 

Strongly disagree. He came off as extremely candid to me and frustrated with himself and humbled by his tough outing on the biggest stage in his sport. For how much we complain about the lack of transparency from the FO, his candor here was much appreciated by me. Not sure why you’d prefer stock lines to this  🤷‍♂️ 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, joelala said:

Strongly disagree. He came off as extremely candid to me and frustrated with himself and humbled by his tough outing on the biggest stage in his sport. For how much we complain about the lack of transparency from the FO, his candor here was much appreciated by me. Not sure why you’d prefer stock lines to this  🤷‍♂️ 

That he realizes what he did wrong means he probably will not repeat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, joelala said:

Strongly disagree. He came off as extremely candid to me and frustrated with himself and humbled by his tough outing on the biggest stage in his sport. For how much we complain about the lack of transparency from the FO, his candor here was much appreciated by me. Not sure why you’d prefer stock lines to this  🤷‍♂️ 

Noted.   Where did I say I prefer canned lines?  I said he was messing up canned lines and that he didn’t look like he wanted to be in the interview.  To me, not a good look for a new guy.  I imagine he knew he was going to have to do interviews when he aspired to be a Major League Baseball player.  I thought he came off very robotic and generally disinterested.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

Took me awhile to find it:  https://video.masnlivestream.com/video/Kyle Bradish on his rough fourth inning against Twins/2170

 

It's not that bad, IMO.  Not all of these guys are going to be brilliant and engaging in front of the media.  Not all of these guys are going to like answering questions, especially after a bit of struggling.  Maybe there's a little bit of Bedard here, and that's fine.

Which brings me to the best ever Bedard/media exchange:

Bedard:  "I'm only allowing three questions."

Reporter:  "Why only three questions?"

Bedard:  "That's one."

I died.  That was hilarious.

 

That was the best post game interview ever.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Noted.   Where did I say I prefer canned lines?  I said he was messing up canned lines and that he didn’t look like he wanted to be in the interview.  To me, not a good look for a new guy.  I imagine he knew he was going to have to do interviews when he aspired to be a Major League Baseball player.  I thought he came off very robotic and generally disinterested.    

True, I misread your original post, my apologies.  I do understand your point of view, but seem to have a different read on his behavior. Crazy how subjective human behavior is! Hoping his next post game interview is after a W. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Two routine plays by a ML 3B. 
    • It’s not strange at all. They brought him back quickly off the IL because they felt he could hit. He has sat twice since bringing him back…day games after a night game. When he was playing in the field, he was getting a day off every week as well. So, they are giving him an extra day off as he recovers from an injury..being extra cautious with him. I don’t think that’s strange at all. If he needed TJ surgery, they wouldn’t have brought him back and it’s not likely his elbow has gone from tendonitis to a torn ligament in a weeks time (ie, it’s not likely to have gotten that much worse) I had tennis elbow and couldn’t lift anything heavier than a cell phone without having a lot of pain and ended up having to get 3 cortisone injections for it to be ok. Suffice it to say, if this is what he’s experiencing, he likely couldn’t lift a bat, much less get hits. They are essentially letting him rehab while playing, which indicates to me their intention of having him up this year.
    • If he’s at the point where he’s throwing off the mound, he might not need too much rehab outings. Heck, you get a 26 man roster for a 3/5/7 game series. You can even go with him as a prayer on a big roster and even IL him and replace him mid series. What would we have to lose. He most certainly has the frame to help out.  We’ll see. I hope. 
    • I understand @Sports Guy ‘s thinking here. If Adley/Basallo are your C/DH next year, Holliday is at 2B, Mounty has more trade value than O’Hearn, but even with all that… can we really move on from Santa and Mounty in the offseason? It sounds plausible, and that could be our Burnes money, but that is a lot to move on from on a b2b 100 win team.  It just is. But I can see the thinking. Use the saved money from Mounty/Santa for Burnes’ 2025 salary. Then trade Mounty for a SP. The 2025 rotation would then be Burnes, Grayson, Traded for SP, Irvin, Povich. Kremer and Suarez in the mix as well. 
    • You could argue that, except that a trade where Westburg is the center piece won’t get you a #1 starter. Trading a young controllable MVP level player can absolutely be a smart thing to do if you’re getting a young controllable Cy Young level pitcher back (Skubal, for example). 
    • Realistically, they can ask for the moon and it likely not be an overpay. If he stays healthy all year I think the plan was to move him back to the rotation next year. He's under control for a long time.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...