Jump to content

Drew Rom 2022


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Pickles said:

If you're going to put a number on it I probably think it's higher than your number but solid in this relative sense would still be a pretty low number.  I certainly don't think he has an above 50% chance of making it as a ML starter.

I guess, my point, is my evaluation of him hasn't been altered all that much this year.  He hasn't had a breakout season, but again, he hasn't imo "pitched himself off" of being considered a prospect.

It also kinda depends on how you define "making it as a ML starter".

He has a solid chance to make it in the way that Spenser Watkins has made it. And that would be an excellent outcome for a 4th round pick!

He has maybe a 5 percent chance of making 100 career MLB starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

It also kinda depends on how you define "making it as a ML starter".

He has a solid chance to make it in the way that Spenser Watkins has made it. And that would be an excellent outcome for a 4th round pick!

He has maybe a 5 percent chance of making 100 career MLB starts.

This is all true as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

How are you defining solid?  I’d say his chances are 5% at best.

Well, he’s an Orioles pitching prospect, so that means 5% chance of being a solid starter is a top prospect for us.   

What were the odds for Lowther, Baumann, Zimmermann, Akin, Kremer, Bradish?  What were the odds for John Means?  David Hess?  Tyler Wilson, Mike Wright?

Honestly I’m not sure where Rom falls on this spectrum.   I was pretty bullish on him going into the year.   I feel like he hasn’t taken the step forward I’d hoped for, but he hasn’t taken a big step backwards either.  He did miss a couple of weeks for unexplained reasons (COVID?  A minor injury?).   I could see him having 3-4 sharp outings in a row and being right where you’d want him to be.   Or, not.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pickles said:

If you're going to put a number on it I probably think it's higher than your number but solid in this relative sense would still be a pretty low number.  I certainly don't think he has an above 50% chance of making it as a ML starter.

I guess, my point, is my evaluation of him hasn't been altered all that much this year.  He hasn't had a breakout season, but again, he hasn't imo "pitched himself off" of being considered a prospect.

For me, and just for now, he's taken a step backwards this year. 

Now, I could definitely be wrong. This could be SSS performance, caused by some basic ailment or developmental step he's focused on, and that disappears soon. I'm not saying that's impossible.

But going into this year, he was fringy as a prospect in my eyes basically because of his velo. I think Tony's write-ups on him were bullish, and totally respect that given his history with Zach Davies. I just think it's very hard to make that leap into something like a John Means without your profile really maximizing its potential, and he hasn't done that yet this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

For me, and just for now, he's taken a step backwards this year. 

Now, I could definitely be wrong. This could be SSS performance, caused by some basic ailment or developmental step he's focused on, and that disappears soon. I'm not saying that's impossible.

But going into this year, he was fringy as a prospect in my eyes basically because of his velo. I think Tony's write-ups on him were bullish, and totally respect that given his history with Zach Davies. I just think it's very hard to make that leap into something like a John Means without your profile really maximizing its potential, and he hasn't done that yet this year.

Well if the issue is velo, and presumably missing bats, then aren't you heartened by the 11 k/9 rate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Well if the issue is velo, and presumably missing bats, then aren't you heartened by the 11 k/9 rate?

A little? 

I'm pretty convinced that this development team is nearly maximizing the ability to miss bats. I'm still more interested in the profile.

But, to your point, this development team seems to give a wider range of profiles a believable pathway to success at higher levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

A little? 

I'm pretty convinced that this development team is nearly maximizing the ability to miss bats. I'm still more interested in the profile.

But, to your point, this development team seems to give a wider range of profiles a believable pathway to success at higher levels.

I worry about is that high K rate is what is producing the high BB rate- meaning he's chasing Ks at the expense of efficiency and strike throwing- and so it is a bit illusory.  

We'll see as he keeps moving up the ladder.  But that's kind of my point: That was my position three months ago and not much has changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the in game box after the 5 shutout at Somerset and was almost back in hype mode.

His draft year I believe he was near the Top 10 bonuses given to high school arms, and as a LHP I hope it helps the raw play.

Maybe this year is consolidation and not another step forward, but with Kjerstad having made it to the first stepping stone, Rom's second half is high up on the list of things I'm not sure about to watch unfold.

Here's how his pedigree compares with the line of lefty hits and misses:

Lowther NCAA 2-74, $800k

Zimmermann NCAA 5-140, $10,000    (today I learned Zimm was a We Went Overslot on someone else offset)

Akin NCAA 2-54, $1.2mm

Means, NCAA 11-331, no bonus given on B-Ref 11th round page for that draft year

Rom, High School, 4-115, $600k

The old regime seemed to have pretty good taste in high school pitchers.    Last night the pregame show had a feature on Mancini's minor league years (had some video of the 21-year-old Ironbird back in the day I'd never seen), and a highlight of it was Trey and Yaz leading the Baysox to their Eastern League championship.    Hoping Rom can make good use of the first half flush and get another crack at it this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

7/0 K/BB in five shutout innings on the road maybe his best game of the year.

https://www.milb.com/gameday/baysox-vs-flying-squirrels/2022/07/23/672406#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=box,game=672406

Baysox continue to enjoy split-season reset and postseason possibilities for Rom-Cowser-Kjerstad.    I hope their Grayson ringer isn't more than another few weeks away.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's one thing I've learned from watching baseball seriously for over 50 years, it's that minor league performance isn't always a good predictor. Means' minor league numbers weren't all that great, certainly no better than Rom's. Rom has 110 innings at AA and been relatively successful. Why wait to move him to Norfolk? Let's see what we have. I don't understand the reluctance to move guys along. Cal, Eddie, and Brooks had really nice minor league careers, but their minor league numbers certainly didn't scream out HOF. They were all up at 21 for their ML debuts. If it's about service time with a guy like Rom, then I can only shake my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

If there's one thing I've learned from watching baseball seriously for over 50 years, it's that minor league performance isn't always a good predictor. Means' minor league numbers weren't all that great, certainly no better than Rom's. Rom has 110 innings at AA and been relatively successful. Why wait to move him to Norfolk? Let's see what we have. I don't understand the reluctance to move guys along. Cal, Eddie, and Brooks had really nice minor league careers, but their minor league numbers certainly didn't scream out HOF. They were all up at 21 for their ML debuts. If it's about service time with a guy like Rom, then I can only shake my head.

It’s not at all about service time with a guy like Rom.   He may get promoted but it’s not like he’s set the world on fire this year or has overwhelming stuff.   I’d call his season a mixed bag and a mild disappointment so far considering how strongly he finished last season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

It’s not at all about service time with a guy like Rom.   He may get promoted but it’s not like he’s set the world on fire this year or has overwhelming stuff.   I’d call his season a mixed bag and a mild disappointment so far considering how strongly he finished last season.  

Agree about the service time; I just hope the FO isn't thinking about that. I'm a little more encouraged than you are about his progress, but when you look at the pitching across the Eastern League, he's certainly among the top pitchers. Maybe not top 10, but he'll be 23 next season, and I just don't see the point of slow rolling all these top prospects. He's got 110 innings at AA, and if he moves soon, he could get 40-45 at Norfolk in 2022 and start there next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

Agree about the service time; I just hope the FO isn't thinking about that. I'm a little more encouraged than you are about his progress, but when you look at the pitching across the Eastern League, he's certainly among the top pitchers. Maybe not top 10, but he'll be 23 next season, and I just don't see the point of slow rolling all these top prospects. He's got 110 innings at AA, and if he moves soon, he could get 40-45 at Norfolk in 2022 and start there next season. 

I think he has a decent chance of getting promoted.  He’s been kind of inconsistent and it would be nice to see him string together 2-3 good outings in a row.   He’s only thrown three games all year where he pitched at least 5 innings and allowed 0 or 1 runs.  Last year he did that 12 times, including 6 out of 7 starts immediately before he was promoted.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm not in the group that expected us to miss the playoffs a few days ago.  This thread was a bit silly at the time, and has now become completely irrelevant.  But stating we are going to win 5 of the next 9 games as a fact, is just as ignorant as the people who think we are going to lose out or continue the tailspin to the point that we will miss the playoffs.  As much as I can't stand constant negativity, I also can't stand people who have no tolerance for any negativity, or pessimism, or whatever you want to call it.  If you just want to be a part of a cheerleading group and resent any criticism of the team, a hardcore fan message board is probably not the place for you.  Not just speaking to this poster, but as a retort to similar opinions in general. 
    • Would the team be any better off with Skubal than they are now, considering the hitting woes?  I think that’s debatable, and questionable enough that I wouldn’t give up that high level talent to find out.    Who knows if the Tigers would have even done that?  They’ve made a nice run behind Skubal and the rest of their staff since the deadline. I think it’s a good chance they extend him to lead that young team into the next several years of what they hope are contending teams. Decent position player pool there. 
    • The Tigers are a fun story, reminiscent of the ‘22 birds a little bit (if that team had had a CY winner heading the rotation). But we need to end the dream for them this weekend. Take care of business versus Detroit and next weeks games will hardly matter. We can get our staff set up for the WC series after their next turn. That would be ideal. 
    • This is my thinking as well.  Who would have guessed that despite all the injuries, the Trevor Rogers fiasco and Corbin Burnes' terrible August that the most reliable part of this team would still be the starting pitching?  Eflin and Suarez have anchored a much better than expected rotation, with Kremer and Povich hanging in there despite some rough starts.  The current rotation has mostly kept us in games despite the absence of hitting and a head shaking bullpen.  Would we be better right now with Skubal?  Probably, but not by much with so much else wrong with this team.  Plus we kept our position player future that is clearly mostly still developing.   Perhaps we could still trade for Skubal this offseason, but with the Tigers suddenly Wild Card contenders I can't see them letting him go.  Maybe they'd trade him for a crazy package crazy like Adley, Holliday, Kjerstad and Povich.  I think that ship has sailed and maybe was never close to being a reality anyway.
    • I'm actually not concerned about his throwing arm, it's more about his hitting. There's definitely value in a super utility player like him who can play CF, SS, 2B, but his value was also the ability to hit lefties pretty well and speed.  I wouldn't mind bringing him back because presumably he'd start the season on the IL and wouldn't clog a roster spot.   
    • If you want to add all the extras the O's are still playing Davis and Cobb.
    • This is a good reminder that basically by design free agents are almost always "not worth their price". I think you've posted a number of analyses over the years demonstrating this. After looking at the available free agents and just how bleak the offensive upgrades are, I can see a path where Santander makes some sense. For example, signing Santander or someone like Alonso to play first base along with a trade of Mountcastle would increase the offensive potential of the team for the next couple of years, allow Kjerstad or other young players to take over RF, and ditching Mountcastle's salary would offset part of the cost of signing a free agent. The free agent contract is likely to stink in the final year or two, but that's the case for most of the possible (and realistic) upgrades. As we have seen in the second half, relying on the young players is also a risk. Basallo, Rutschman, Mayo or other internal options may occupy first in a couple of years. Just thinking out loud.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...