Jump to content

Should Mike Mussina’s number have been retired?


Frobby

Should Mike Mussina’s number have been retired?  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Mike Mussina’s number have been retired?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/30/22 at 15:44

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

This isn’t correct.  The Orioles increased their offer at the last minute, but did not come close to what the Yankees offered.   

I absolutely do not buy into any narrative that says Mussina was a turncoat.   He told the O’s what he wanted a year before he hit free agency, and it was very reasonable.   They didn’t give it to him (or come close at the time), so he went on the FA market and ended up getting much more than what he’d asked for from the O’s previously.   His departure is on Angelos and the O’s, period.   They treated him very poorly.   

That said, I’m fine with their choice not to retire his number.  

 

Yep.  All of this.  Calling him a traitor is over the top for me.

The only thing I felt was a little douchey about all of that is when Mussina said the Yankees players made him feel more wanted.  I remember him talking about Jeter calling him for example.  I can see why you would question Angelos but you were in the same locker room for years with those guys.  You. know how they felt and they didn't need to make a special call to make you feel special.

Other than that, I have zero issue with his decision.  He jumped off the titanic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, 20 year old Moose Milligan would be calling him a traitor, turncoat, etc.  

40 year old Moose Milligan can't blame him for, as @Sports Guy said, jumping off the Titanic.  Maybe going to the Yankees was a "**** you" to Angelos, maybe it was just simply taking the most amount of money offered.  As someone who has long wanted to say "**** you" to Angelos and would sell out for making the most amount of money, I totally understand it.

On top of it, I don't think he cares if his number is retired or if he has a statue or not.  I'm sure he probably understood that if he went in with an Orioles hat on his HoF plaque, he'd get both.  But he went in with a blank hat, so it's not like he went in as a Yankee, either.   If he's comfortable with his decisions and how his career unfolded, I'm curious as to why a lot of fans aren't.

I also don't believe this is such a hotly debated topic if he wound up in some place like Cleveland, for example.  Just the fact that it's the Yankees makes people butthurt about it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I didn’t want to derail the thread on Adley’s debut, but SG posted this tweet from Buster Olney:

What’s your view of this?   Personally, Mussina was one of my favorite players ever, and I did not blame him one bit when he left the team.   I strongly supported his election to the Hall of Fame and of course the Orioles Hall of Fame.   But with all that said, I’m not offended that the O’s chose not to retire his number.   He chose to leave, in the prime of his career.   If the O’s had retired his number, that would have been OK with me, but I’m also OK with their decision not to retire it.  

As to Olney’s tweet, I wonder how many Hall of Famers voluntarily left their original team after 10+ years and while still in their prime.   
 

I feel the same as you. I have not read the whole thread, but the one thing I've noticed about retired numbers and statue recipients is that they all had gained World Series rings as Orioles. Mussina did not have that second distinction or achievement. Not solely his fault as only the '96 and '97 O's got into the postseason. Am I wrong about the retired number part? I was only going from what I've seen of those numbers painted on the upper deck in left field. But I know that is true of the statue recipients, a ring AND an MLB HOF induction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NashLumber said:

I feel the same as you. I have not read the whole thread, but the one thing I've noticed about retired numbers and statue recipients is that they all had gained World Series rings as Orioles. Mussina did not have that second distinction or achievement. Not solely his fault as only the '96 and '97 O's got into the postseason. Am I wrong about the retired number part? I was only going from what I've seen of those numbers painted on the upper deck in left field. But I know that is true of the statue recipients, a ring AND an MLB HOF induction. 

It's literally just the numbers of Orioles in the HoF as Orioles. 

There is no ring requirement or hardware requirement. If you go to the HoF as an Oriole your number gets retired.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, 20 year old Moose Milligan would be calling him a traitor, turncoat, etc.  

40 year old Moose Milligan can't blame him for, as @Sports Guy said, jumping off the Titanic.  Maybe going to the Yankees was a "**** you" to Angelos, maybe it was just simply taking the most amount of money offered.  As someone who has long wanted to say "**** you" to Angelos and would sell out for making the most amount of money, I totally understand it.

On top of it, I don't think he cares if his number is retired or if he has a statue or not.  I'm sure he probably understood that if he went in with an Orioles hat on his HoF plaque, he'd get both.  But he went in with a blank hat, so it's not like he went in as a Yankee, either.   If he's comfortable with his decisions and how his career unfolded, I'm curious as to why a lot of fans aren't.

I also don't believe this is such a hotly debated topic if he wound up in some place like Cleveland, for example.  Just the fact that it's the Yankees makes people butthurt about it.  

I agree with all of that.  30 year old Drungo had a newspaper clipping of an article calling Mussina a traitor tacked to my fridge.

50 year old Drungo doesn't blame anyone for wanting out of the late 90s/early 2000s Orioles.  This is a team that had 80-year-old Syd Thrift as the GM on purpose. The team that led the majors in payroll in 1998, and had the same payroll 10+ years later as everyone else doubled theirs. The team that fired Jon Miller and John Lowenstein. The team that seemed a lot more engaged in fighting the Nationals than doing what it took to field a competitive team.

My only real beef with Mussina was signing with the Yanks. If it had been the Dodgers or the Braves or the Cubs... fine, no problem at all.  But the Yanks was a little about money, and a lot about giving Angelos the middle finger. Not sure he thought through that he was also giving that finger to the O's fans who'd rooted like heck for him for a decade.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nevadaO said:

Is he in the HoF? Yes.

Is he in the HoF as an Oriole? No.

= No retired number

Which we know is kind of random.  Frank had nearly twice the games and plate appearances with the Reds than the O's, won an MVP with the Reds, but gets an O's hat on his plaque in Cooperstown.  If the HOF had left his hat blank like the often do today does Frank not get a retired number or a statue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I agree with all of that.  30 year old Drungo had a newspaper clipping of an article calling Mussina a traitor tacked to my fridge.

50 year old Drungo doesn't blame anyone for wanting out of the late 90s/early 2000s Orioles.  This is a team that had 80-year-old Syd Thrift as the GM on purpose. The team that led the majors in payroll in 1998, and had the same payroll 10+ years later as everyone else doubled theirs. The team that fired Jon Miller and John Lowenstein. The team that seemed a lot more engaged in fighting the Nationals than doing what it took to field a competitive team.

My only real beef with Mussina was signing with the Yanks. If it had been the Dodgers or the Braves or the Cubs... fine, no problem at all.  But the Yanks was a little about money, and a lot about giving Angelos the middle finger. Not sure he thought through that he was also giving that finger to the O's fans who'd rooted like heck for him for a decade.

Wait, they fired Lowenstein too?  I'd not heard that.

I think Mussina had enough foresight to know that someday, O's fans everywhere would want to give Angelos the finger and that we'd understand.  Turns out, he was right.  

Anyway, Mussina had some great moments as an Oriole.  I loved watching him pitch.  How he decided to embark on the second half of his career was up to him but it doesn't take away from the joy I had watching him when he was here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Murray also did not leave as a free agent, he was traded away by a stupid Front office and basically chased away by a ridiculous press.

Easily one of the worst things that the Orioles ever did.  

If the O's kept Murray, The 1989 squad would have probably made the playoffs.  

The O's would not have traded for Glenn Davis.  

The Orioles of the 90's would have had Pete Harnisch, Curt Schilling, and Mike Mussina heading into the '92-'97 stretch, which would have been a damn good rotation.  Having an outfield with Steve Finley alongside Brady Anderson would have been icing on the cake.  

I can definitely see one of those Orioles squads winning the World Series.  

Trading Murray was easily one of the stupidest moves, which led to a cascade of stupider moves and missed opportunities.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Which we know is kind of random.  Frank had nearly twice the games and plate appearances with the Reds than the O's, won an MVP with the Reds, but gets an O's hat on his plaque in Cooperstown.  If the HOF had left his hat blank like the often do today does Frank not get a retired number or a statue?

Honestly? Probably not, no. 

And agreed, it is quite random. In the case of Frank though I think the HoF made the right choice given how his departure from Cincinnati went down.

I don't necessarily agree with the criteria but it's clear that's what they've done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Wait, they fired Lowenstein too?  I'd not heard that.

I think Mussina had enough foresight to know that someday, O's fans everywhere would want to give Angelos the finger and that we'd understand.  Turns out, he was right.  

Anyway, Mussina had some great moments as an Oriole.  I loved watching him pitch.  How he decided to embark on the second half of his career was up to him but it doesn't take away from the joy I had watching him when he was here.

Yes they fired Lowenstein who (in my opinion) did a great job providing color commentary on HTS. Apparently Angelos didn't like Lownstein's quirky sense of humor so he was not brought back when his contract expired with HTS. 

Luckily we got Jim Palmer to eventually be the lead analyst on television, but there's no reason both of them couldn't have worked on the television side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Wait, they fired Lowenstein too?  I'd not heard that.

I think Mussina had enough foresight to know that someday, O's fans everywhere would want to give Angelos the finger and that we'd understand.  Turns out, he was right.  

Anyway, Mussina had some great moments as an Oriole.  I loved watching him pitch.  How he decided to embark on the second half of his career was up to him but it doesn't take away from the joy I had watching him when he was here.

Completely by chance I saw Mussina's 1st and 100th MLB wins in person.  And I only get to a handful of games a year.  Lots of great memories of his time in Baltimore.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Yes they fired Lowenstein who (in my opinion) did a great job providing color commentary on HTS. Apparently Angelos didn't like Lownstein's quirky sense of humor so he was not brought back when his contract expired with HTS. 

Luckily we got Jim Palmer to eventually be the lead analyst on television, but there's no reason both of them couldn't have worked on the television side. 

Proctor and Lowenstein were fantastic together.  Lowenstein was hilarious.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nevadaO said:

Honestly? Probably not, no. 

And agreed, it is quite random. In the case of Frank though I think the HoF made the right choice given how his departure from Cincinnati went down.

I don't necessarily agree with the criteria but it's clear that's what they've done. 

And like all unwritten rules, it's ironclad until they have some reason to ignore it.  If the 2028 Orioles sign... I don't know... Juan Soto and he's the key to a couple great World Series teams, but he goes into the Hall as a Nat they'd have a hard time not retiring his number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Proctor and Lowenstein were fantastic together.  Lowenstein was hilarious.

 

But he was a wierdo.  And when you're a 1950s guy like ol' Pete you can't abide by weirdos.  Might be a commie for all we know.  Baseball announcing is for straight-laced, clean-shaven Americans.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

And like all unwritten rules, it's ironclad until they have some reason to ignore it.  If the 2028 Orioles sign... I don't know... Juan Soto and he's the key to a couple great World Series teams, but he goes into the Hall as a Nat they'd have a hard time not retiring his number.

Sure, but is Moose worthy of changing the rules? 

#35 will be retired eventually, when Adley goes in to the HoF as an Oriole after multiple World Series victories! 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Perhaps, I don't really know. Since my press credentials were not renewed after COVID, I don't really know the new announcers besides Brett Hollander, due his WBAL days. I knew Arnold a little bit from his Frederick time.  Either way, I don't get the impression that Melanie talks out of turn or doesn't know what she can or can't say. Perhaps she was talking to Hyde and he said something offhand like, "Maybe even Bautistsa will be ready by the playoffs." Who knows?  I've been in a lot of situations talking with players and coaches and I knew what I could or could not say and when it was appropriate to report something, even if it was from an "unnamed source." I'm fairly certain Melanie would not still have a job with the Orioles if she did not know this by now too. 
    • It's a little surprising she would go "off-script", so to speak, on MASN when Elias has denied any chance of Bautista pitching this year. But perhaps MASN folks have a little more freedom under Rubenstein. 
    • Well, they got some good starts from Bradish so we'll see if that helps them win the AL East. If they win it by a game or two you can say he had an impact on this season. Bradish could still be back by the end of 2025 if everything goes smoothly.
    • Not to turn this into a Melanie Newman thread again, but she's actually not too bad when she's doing the color part of the broadcast. She'll drop some meaningful statistical information occasionally and the other day she said something (can't remember exactly what it was) and I was like, "Hmm, not bad Melanie" in my head. The issue is she just too slow in describing the action and does not paint a good enough picture of where the balls are hit or the likely outcome.  An example would be something like this.  "He hits a skyball into the deep blue sky....(second of pause) the outfielder is going out for it but he won't get it. And Henderson is on second for a double. We don't know where, how far, or what the action was other than the ball was a skyball and the outfielder misses it. She'll then go back and explain in more detail what happened. I better call would be "Henderson lines a ball into deep right center, the center fielder is going over quickly but it's going to fall in, Henderson is rounding first, heading for second as the CF throws the ball in to the cut off as Henderson walks into second with a standup double." Now we have a much better picture of what happened in our minds.  Arnold gets too wordy at times too and sometimes gets behind but he's still better overall and has the best radio voice. Brett Hollander is the best at PBP in my opinion despite my "dislike" for him calling the Orioles "Baltimore" like an away/national announcer.      
    • I feel as though they bungled Bautista and Bradish’s injuries by delaying the inevitable. Because of those delays, it could be no Bautista until 2025 and no Bradish until 2026. 
    • I think it’s fair to ask if he’s getting much to hit. With all the walks, it certainly seems like teams are staying away from him, even more so than Mayo. Would be nice to get some real reports about what is going on down there.
    • I take it more as this is the talk behind the scenes and she just didn’t read the room well enough to know she wasn’t supposed to say anything.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...