Jump to content

Baumler scratched from his start today?


flaoriolesfan

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Wondering if there were already health concerns with him in the spring and that’s really the reason he was held back rather than the babying theory. 

Well they certainly aren't babying 18 year old Deivy Cruz.  The little LHP threw 87 pitches yesterday.   Seems like they are much more aggressive with the Latin pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Well they certainly aren't babying 18 year old Deivy Cruz.  The little LHP threw 87 pitches yesterday.   Seems like they are much more aggressive with the Latin pitchers.

I doubt it's because they're "Latin." 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I doubt it's because they're "Latin." 

I don't think he was trying to make that point, more of an observation. I do wonder if there were other health concerns for Baumler out of spring training since it really made no sense to have him able to throw at the beginning of spring training games and then couldn't make the Delmarva team.

Again, hopefully this is just them being overly cautious but shoulders are never a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't think he was trying to make that point, more of an observation. I do wonder if there were other health concerns for Baumler out of spring training since it really made no sense to have him able to throw at the beginning of spring training games and then couldn't make the Delmarva team.

Again, hopefully this is just them being overly cautious but shoulders are never a good thing.

Yea..is this just “normal” after not pitching for a while or is this a bigger sign of an issue?

Either way, pretty obvious he won’t be throwing many more innings this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

I doubt it's because they're "Latin." 

They happen to be Latin.  Perhaps they have built more innings up over the last two years.  Whatever.   Portes and Delosantos are 19 years/20 years old and going 6 innings.  Cruz was only in the DSL last year and threw 87 pitches yesterday.   Draw whatever conclusions you want.   I was only making what I consider to be a factual statement.   The Orioles seems to be more aggressive with the pitch counts for the pitchers signed as free agents from Latin America.   I'm sure there are perfectly reasonable reasons for it besides some sort of racism which you seem to be implying that I was getting at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

They happen to be Latin.  Perhaps they have built more innings up over the last two years.  Whatever.   Portes and Delosantos are 19 years/20 years old and going 6 innings.  Cruz was only in the DSL last year and threw 87 pitches yesterday.   Draw whatever conclusions you want.   I was only making what I consider to be a factual statement.   The Orioles seems to be more aggressive with the pitch counts for the pitchers signed as free agents from Latin America.   I'm sure there are perfectly reasonable reasons for it besides some sort of racism which you seem to be implying that I was getting at.

No. I'm not saying anything is racist or that anyone is doing anything wrong, and I'm not trying to imply you did either.

I just think the latin part is wrong. I'm guessing, having not done the work myself, that there are white people throwing similar numbers of innings in this org, and that it's more about their relative health than anything else.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

No. I'm not saying anything is racist or that anyone is doing anything wrong, and I'm not trying to imply you did either.

I just think the latin part is wrong. I'm guessing, having not done the work myself, that there are white people throwing similar numbers of innings in this org, and that it's more about their relative health than anything else.

 

I think the real issue here is that almost all of the 20 years old and below pitchers in the system are Latin. Elias has almost totally ignored high school pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

I think the real issue here is that almost all of the 20 years old and below pitchers in the system are Latin. Elias has almost totally ignored high school pitching.

I think it's RZNJ who pointed out that this is how Houston has done it too.

Basically load up on young, cheap, arms and some will develop. I like the strategy because it minimizes the financial risk associated with pitching, but it leaves some holes when you're starting from scratch for sure.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I think the real issue here is that almost all of the 20 years old and below pitchers in the system are Latin. Elias has almost totally ignored high school pitching.

And the ones he does sign mostly get tiny bonuses. He's not even trying to sign good latin pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I think the real issue here is that almost all of the 20 years old and below pitchers in the system are Latin. Elias has almost totally ignored high school pitching.

Yeah, if he doesn’t go heavy on pitching in this year’s draft, we should be concerned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm not in the group that expected us to miss the playoffs a few days ago.  This thread was a bit silly at the time, and has now become completely irrelevant.  But stating we are going to win 5 of the next 9 games as a fact, is just as ignorant as the people who think we are going to lose out or continue the tailspin to the point that we will miss the playoffs.  As much as I can't stand constant negativity, I also can't stand people who have no tolerance for any negativity, or pessimism, or whatever you want to call it.  If you just want to be a part of a cheerleading group and resent any criticism of the team, a hardcore fan message board is probably not the place for you.  Not just speaking to this poster, but as a retort to similar opinions in general. 
    • Would the team be any better off with Skubal than they are now, considering the hitting woes?  I think that’s debatable, and questionable enough that I wouldn’t give up that high level talent to find out.    Who knows if the Tigers would have even done that?  They’ve made a nice run behind Skubal and the rest of their staff since the deadline. I think it’s a good chance they extend him to lead that young team into the next several years of what they hope are contending teams. Decent position player pool there. 
    • The Tigers are a fun story, reminiscent of the ‘22 birds a little bit (if that team had had a CY winner heading the rotation). But we need to end the dream for them this weekend. Take care of business versus Detroit and next weeks games will hardly matter. We can get our staff set up for the WC series after their next turn. That would be ideal. 
    • This is my thinking as well.  Who would have guessed that despite all the injuries, the Trevor Rogers fiasco and Corbin Burnes' terrible August that the most reliable part of this team would still be the starting pitching?  Eflin and Suarez have anchored a much better than expected rotation, with Kremer and Povich hanging in there despite some rough starts.  The current rotation has mostly kept us in games despite the absence of hitting and a head shaking bullpen.  Would we be better right now with Skubal?  Probably, but not by much with so much else wrong with this team.  Plus we kept our position player future that is clearly mostly still developing.   Perhaps we could still trade for Skubal this offseason, but with the Tigers suddenly Wild Card contenders I can't see them letting him go.  Maybe they'd trade him for a crazy package crazy like Adley, Holliday, Kjerstad and Povich.  I think that ship has sailed and maybe was never close to being a reality anyway.
    • I'm actually not concerned about his throwing arm, it's more about his hitting. There's definitely value in a super utility player like him who can play CF, SS, 2B, but his value was also the ability to hit lefties pretty well and speed.  I wouldn't mind bringing him back because presumably he'd start the season on the IL and wouldn't clog a roster spot.   
    • If you want to add all the extras the O's are still playing Davis and Cobb.
    • This is a good reminder that basically by design free agents are almost always "not worth their price". I think you've posted a number of analyses over the years demonstrating this. After looking at the available free agents and just how bleak the offensive upgrades are, I can see a path where Santander makes some sense. For example, signing Santander or someone like Alonso to play first base along with a trade of Mountcastle would increase the offensive potential of the team for the next couple of years, allow Kjerstad or other young players to take over RF, and ditching Mountcastle's salary would offset part of the cost of signing a free agent. The free agent contract is likely to stink in the final year or two, but that's the case for most of the possible (and realistic) upgrades. As we have seen in the second half, relying on the young players is also a risk. Basallo, Rutschman, Mayo or other internal options may occupy first in a couple of years. Just thinking out loud.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...