Jump to content

Rutschman vs Witt


Filmstudy

Recommended Posts

As it stands right now:

Rutschman: .302/.420/.722 for 104 OPS+ and 

Witt: .299/.450/.749 for 109 OPS+

Despite fairly close hitting statistics, including positional relativity and defense:

Rutschman turns your otherwise .500 team into a .515 team

Witt turns your otherwise .500 team into a .497 team

Projected to 162 games played for each, having Rutschman at his (under)performance to date is worth 3 more wins.

It sure looks like the Orioles drafted the right guy.

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

One thing, I would note that Bobby Witt Jr. is two years younger than Adley. And it's possible being younger that Witt will have ultimately have a higher ceiling than Adley as a player. 

I'm happy with Adley too because the importance of  having a great defensive catcher who can also hit is substantial. 

Very fair point.

I think it may also be possible Witt has to move towards the DH end (do not read as all the way) of the defensive spectrum.  Adley is staying at catcher for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Filmstudy said:

 

It sure looks like the Orioles drafted the right guy.

 

I'd say it looks pretty close and it is way too early to tell which has the better career. I am certainly happy with Adley's production and everything he has brought to our team.

How are you calculating .515 vs .497? Does it factor in that Adley has accumulated his WAR in approximately half the AB's as Witt? Adjusting for AB's, bbref has Adley significantly better than Witt, Fangraphs less so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I'd say it looks pretty close and it is way too early to tell which has the better career. I am certainly happy with Adley's production and everything he has brought to our team.

How are you calculating .515 vs .497? Does it factor in that Adley has accumulated his WAR in approximately half the AB's as Witt? Adjusting for AB's, bbref has Adley significantly better than Witt, Fangraphs less so. 

Witt should be the strong favorite to have the better  career.  He's younger and catchers decline faster.

Initial team control is the real issue and I think Adley has the edge there.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Witt should be the strong favorite to have the better  career.  He's younger and catchers decline faster.

Initial team control is the real issue and I think Adley has the edge there.

That was really dumb of them to call up Witt on opening day. However if the question is which one we should have drafted, team control shouldn't be a factor. If the question is which one would I rather have right now, you are right, big advantage to Rutschman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adley was the right pick IMO because of the scarcity of catchers that have his combination of offensive and defensive abilities.

The Orioles may have gotten someone close to as good (if not better) as Witt in Henderson and then again with Holliday.  A catcher with Adley's skillset is so much harder to find.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not worried about the age difference, by the time it really matters, both will be in their free agent years. Plus the Orioles control Adley for an additional year.

I fully expect Adley to have more value over the next 6 seasons and a half seasons than Witt will over the next 5 and a half seasons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

I'm not worried about the age difference, by the time it really matters, both will be in their free agent years. Plus the Orioles control Adley for an additional year.

I fully expect Adley to have more value over the next 6 seasons and a half seasons than Witt will over the next 5 and a half seasons

Sure, the age difference shouldn't be a factor in the years under initial team control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

That was really dumb of them to call up Witt on opening day. However if the question is which one we should have drafted, team control shouldn't be a factor. If the question is which one would I rather have right now, you are right, big advantage to Rutschman. 

Seems as if most teams valued the chance at an additional draft pick more than they did the additional service time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If I'm reading this correctly, the Orioles are 6th in defensive value this year and the White Sox are dead last by a lot: to date, they're at -54 runs; the worst team in baseball for all of '23 was -72 (https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/team_compare.cgi?request=1&year=2024&lg=MLB&stat=runs_fielding). So the difference between Burnes and Fedde must be the defensive adjustment. FWIW, fWAR using FIP has them even at 2.0 WAR apiece; using RA9 Burnes is ahead 2.9 to 2.4.
    • One game at a time. Let’s go O’s 👍🏻
    • You do realize our pen has given up fewer runs, fewer hits, fewer BBs, has a lower WHIP, and has more Ks?  I get that they don’t pass your eye test, but the numbers don’t back that up.  With all that said, I think they need to reinforce the pen but let’s stop with the dramatics.  
    • The OP is too pessimistic. NYY is 5-5 in their last 10, Orioles are 8-2. NYY have cooled down, as predicted. The O's are getting them at the right time. With that said, it's baseball. Anything can happen. I would be surprised if the Orioles don't take at least 2 out of 3, though.
    • Objectively speaking I would have WAY MORE confidence in Rodon than Irvin/Kremer/Suarez. And I LOVE what both Irvin and Suarez have done for us this season and couldn’t have dreamed of either giving us any more than they have.
    • Holliday is not getting traded IMO, so there’s really no point in discussing that. But there is a case to be made that the other two are a bit redundant and if we plan on doing some extensions, they could be expendable (at least one of them). Off the top of my head. I would strongly consider Miller or Crochet for one of them. I guess I look at it like this, I can see a realistic plausible scenario of us winning a championship or more without the services of Basallo or Mayo. However, I cannot see ya winning this season as is without a meaningful upgrade to the current pitching. Many said all last season, the pitching was good as is, until it (predictably) wasn’t.
    • Well for starters, there closer and set up man are both better than ours. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that the Yanks pen is better than the Phills by any stretch. But it is better than ours.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...