Jump to content

Correa opts out…should the Os pursue him?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Well I think you undervalue him but he's one, of a few, bridge options to Holliday, and one must assume that Holliday is the long term plan at SS, and he's only a few years away.

Im Not sure how I’m undervaluing him.  I’m just not going to overrate a sub 650 OPs player who just played defense at a level he never has before.  
 

I have said I think he will be the starting SS next year, which I think is a mistake but at least we have depth and can move on from him quickly.

Hes just not an everyday player, especially when you have better options.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Well I think you undervalue him but he's one, of a few, bridge options to Holliday, and one must assume that Holliday is the long term plan at SS, and he's only a few years away.

It's interesting to me that people just assume that Holliday is the SS of the future.   We don't know a whole lot about his defense at SS.   There's a chance that Gunnar is a better SS now and long term.  Possible.  Just saying.   Holliday is 18.   He's not tall.  He may fill out and not have great range.  Who knows?    It's a bit early to assume he's the best SS option in the system.   He looks like he's going to be very good offensively and he's "supposed" to be solid defensively but everyone is just handing him the SS job in 2-3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.  I think I'll take my chances of having a starting SS from one of Henderson, Ortiz or Westburg.  With Ortiz, we at least are likely to get the + defense we got from Mateo.  Henderson at 3B and either Norby or Westburg at 2B (with the other one traded as part of a package for a TOR pitcher or middle of lineup bat).  I'd much rather sign or trade for a 1B/DH type or an OF for the middle of the line-up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Im Not sure how I’m undervaluing him.  I’m just not going to overrate a sub 650 OPs player who just played defense at a level he never has before.  
 

I have said I think he will be the starting SS next year, which I think is a mistake but at least we have depth and can move on from him quickly.

Hes just not an everyday player, especially when you have better options.

Well you undervalue him by not valuing him as what he is: An everyday player.  Yes, he's a poor hitter, but he does literally everything else on the field exceptionally well.  Culmulatively he's an above average regular, or at least he performed as one this year.  You don't think he'll maintain that going forward; I do.  We'll have to wait and see.

I look at this as an 80/20 situation, like the Ravens approach things.

Mateo provides 80% of the value of for 20% of the cost.  In reality, it's probably more like 70/5.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It's interesting to me that people just assume that Holliday is the SS of the future.   We don't know a whole lot about his defense at SS.   There's a chance that Gunnar is a better SS now and long term.  Possible.  Just saying.   Holliday is 18.   He's not tall.  He may fill out and not have great range.  Who knows?    It's a bit early to assume he's the best SS option in the system.   He looks like he's going to be very good offensively and he's "supposed" to be solid defensively but everyone is just handing him the SS job in 2-3 years.

No doubt.  I don't like counting on any prospect, as we've discussed in regards to the infield situation next year.

But with Holliday we have to assume they took him at 1/1, and called him a shortstop very specifically, for a reason.

Holliday may not work out for a variety of reasons, but surely he is the long-term plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Low Country Bird said:

No.  I think I'll take my chances of having a starting SS from one of Henderson, Ortiz or Westburg.  With Ortiz, we at least are likely to get the + defense we got from Mateo.  Henderson at 3B and either Norby or Westburg at 2B (with the other one traded as part of a package for a TOR pitcher or middle of lineup bat).  I'd much rather sign or trade for a 1B/DH type or an OF for the middle of the line-up.  

There's no way in hell Ortiz can defend at SS like Mateo.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pickles said:

No doubt.  I don't like counting on any prospect, as we've discussed in regards to the infield situation next year.

But with Holliday we have to assume they took him at 1/1, and called him a shortstop very specifically, for a reason.

Holliday may not work out for a variety of reasons, but surely he is the long-term plan.

Bobby Witt Jr.   You never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pickles said:

There's no way in hell Ortiz can defend at SS like Mateo.

I have a feeling it's a lot closer than you think.   Of course, there aren't many who have watched Ortiz play SS extensively.   No one was talking about Mateo defensively a year ago either.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Aren't you the one eager to hand over at least one starting job, if not two,  to a couple of decent prospects next year?

I'm talking about guys who are at AAA and going by reports on their defense.   That's a lot different than a kid who has played 5-10 games in low A.   Also, what's that got to do with the fact that Bobby Witt was drafted 1:2 overall as a SS and was found lacking defensively at the ML level.   Holliday could be a GG caliber SS.  I'm just saying it's too early to annoint him that.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

I have a feeling it's a lot closer than you think.   Of course, there aren't many who have watched Ortiz play SS extensively.   No one was talking about Mateo defensively a year ago either.

I was.  I complimented him almost as soon as he came over from San Diego.  He was much more fundamentally sound than I expected.

Now, I didn't expect him to pick it like he did this year, but he obviously was a natural SS.

I should apologize though because when I responded to that post I was actually thinking of Urias.

Ortiz is described as a natural ss as well, so it's certainly a lot closer than it is with Urias, but I think it's folly to expect any prospect to match GG defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...