Jump to content

Any Interesting Non-Tenders


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ShoelesJoe said:

I was intrigued by Luke Voit, but his numbers against LH pitching this season were horrific. Anybody know if that was possibly just a one year blip? 

Voit's career OPS against LHP is .768 which includes his horrific .569 OPS in 2022 versus LHP. But, I don't see the Orioles really having a need for a 1B/DH type player unless they trade a Mountcastle or other player(s) to free up at bats. 

I'm not in favor of taking a flyer on Voit because he's going to be 32 years old and his OPS has trended downwards the last  two seasons. Also players with his body type (6'3" & 255 lbs) don't tend to age well and can hit the wall real fast. 

Alfaro does intrigue me as an option for backup catcher considering Elias is not going to ride Adley hard like the O's did with Wieters. Chirinos is just too old now and too much of blackhole offensively even by backup catcher standards. 

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, tabletop said:

Alex Reyes and Anthony Gose are two relievers I would be interested in. They both had issues with walks last season and we've seen this regime help out similar talents.

I like Gose but he’ll miss next year after TJ surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, orioles119 said:

Alfaro has flexibility to play C and OF and his bat plays in short spurts.  I would pursue him at most.  A move for Bellinger is what the old O's would do - probably not part of the new mindset that hopefully in play at the moment.

Unless the Orioles braintrust thinks they can fix whatever is wrong with Bellinger he's a hard pass. And you're correct this is totally a player the O's would take a chance on before Elias. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Unless the Orioles braintrust thinks they can fix whatever is wrong with Bellinger he's a hard pass. And you're correct this is totally a player the O's would take a chance on before Elias. 

Bellinger is the poster child for being very careful when you consider giving a long contract to a young player. Who would have thought this guy would be non-tendered by 27 years old after the way he hit at 23?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Bellinger is the poster child for being very careful when you consider giving a long contract to a young player. Who would have thought this guy would be non-tendered by 27 years old after the way he hit at 23?

As a fan that would be even worse than the Chris Davis contract. It's generally considered a good move when you sign a young pre-free agent player to an early contract extension. 

But imagine if it blew up in your team's face like how Bellinger has gone from an MVP to a non-tender. That would even be worse seeing your young star expected to be an all star player the next decade almost out of baseball just a few years later.

It's definitely a risk because younger players don't start getting expensive until their arbitration years. That said I would love to hear breaking news on Adley signing a contract this winter and throw in Gunnar for good measure. Maybe it's a little soon on Gunnar, but everything about him screams future star and five tool player.  

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Bellinger is the poster child for being very careful when you consider giving a long contract to a young player. Who would have thought this guy would be non-tendered by 27 years old after the way he hit at 23?

Yes, which is why I think the Orioles will wait at least one more year before locking up either AR or GH, though I could see Henderson rejecting a long term deal due to his agent.

Franco's situation is also a warning against young players getting long term deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Unless the Orioles braintrust thinks they can fix whatever is wrong with Bellinger he's a hard pass. And you're correct this is totally a player the O's would take a chance on before Elias. 

IMO, hard pass is too extreme.  The issue is that there will be a line of teams hoping to catch lightning in a bottle and will likely be willing to give him more money than is reasonable.  But what's reasonable when 40 HR is at stake?  Lefties with power play well anywhere.  Contact though... well that's why he was non-tendered.  

Crunch the numbers, set a price target, and stick to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
    • Mateo does seem to be that “outsider” guy that a lot of the young guys seem to have good chemistry with. And by outsider I mean, player they didn’t play with in the minors.
    • Btw, this could also be nothing more than them trying him out there for versatility reasons..just shagging fly balls and what not..ala Westburg in the past. May not mean they envision him as a starter out there.
    • Mateo and Gunnar turned a show stopping double play yesterday. Love the finnese and confidence from them both.
    • I don’t think it’s desperate at all.   Having more options is always a good thing, and we know the O’s value defensive versatility.  I can think of many SS types who ended up in CF.   Jackson Merrill, who was a top 10-20 prospect as a SS coming into this season, is now the starting CF for the Padres and a good candidate for NL ROY.   Trea Turner played mostly CF for the Nats in 2016 after his call-up, despite having played SS almost exclusively in the minors.  Robin Yount was moved from SS to CF.  So, I see no harm in experimenting with this.  For now though, this is just a rumor so far as I’m concerned.  
    • I don't expect Mateo to continue to be this good but I'm going to enjoy him while he is. I can't really bring myself to complain about his offensive game when some of our regular hitters have yet to eclipse Mateo's OBP mark. I'll reserve my Mateo complaints for when he is no longer playing like one of our better position players.  I find much more to complain about with Mullins, Santander, Hays, McCann, and Urias. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...