Jump to content

Orioles acquire Ryan O’Hearn


Brian88

Recommended Posts

On 1/3/2023 at 6:45 PM, maybenxtyr said:

To me, this puts to rest the idea that Westburg was going to learn 1B and get 4 starts a week around the IF. 

 

At this point it's not worth arguing about the need for O'Hearn or Frazier, but more about what does this mean for the MiL guys that I thought were going to get a legitimate shot in '23? Besides, they could have kept Nevin on the roster as a backup 1B for the minimum over paying O'Hearn 1.4.

I was partially correct, at least about Westburg. 

 

Obviously O'Hearn has been above and beyond what Nevin has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 2:52 PM, Sports Guy said:

No it doesn’t. Our need exists for a player who is good. He hasn’t had an OpS over 650 since 2018.

Just because he stands in the left handed batters box, doesn’t mean he is fits a need.

This one didn't age well.

On 1/3/2023 at 5:52 PM, Yardball85 said:

Not that I wanted Hosmer, but he would have been preferable to O'Hearn. 

In hindsight, Hosmer wouldn't have been referrable just based on age.

On 1/3/2023 at 7:06 PM, Sports Guy said:

Why do they keep signing guys that aren’t good?

 

On 1/3/2023 at 7:59 PM, HakunaSakata said:

Does Ryan O'Hearn really even belong on a MLB roster? Certainly not a good one. I mean, the Kanas City Royals didn't want him for god's sake. 

 

On 1/4/2023 at 9:12 AM, Moose Milligan said:

Wife:  Who's this guy they got from the Royals yesterday?

Moose:  O'Hearn.  He's not good.

Wife:  WHY THE **** ARE THEY GETTING ALL THESE BAD PLAYERS?

 

A lot of us missed on O'Hearn.  Glad he's here, glad he's mashing, glad he's making it hard for prospects to come up.  He's an important part of this team.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 6:05 PM, Tony-OH said:

You better watch out, the Optimists will come after you if you doubt their baseball King. 

Think about this for a bit. 

We left 2022 all exciting, being told we were going on a liftoff from here on out. 

Since then Elias has added one good reliever in Givens, replaced Lyles with Gibson, and now has added Frazier and O'Hearn for a combined $9.4 million. 

Can't make this offseason up.

Funny how it works out when Guys like Elias and his front office Know more than us( you're pick Givens ,not so much) Frazier yes , Ohearn in Spades

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

This one didn't age well.

In hindsight, Hosmer wouldn't have been referrable just based on age.

 

 

A lot of us missed on O'Hearn.  Glad he's here, glad he's mashing, glad he's making it hard for prospects to come up.  He's an important part of this team.

 

“Print the Playoff Tickets”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

This one didn't age well.

In hindsight, Hosmer wouldn't have been referrable just based on age.

 

 

A lot of us missed on O'Hearn.  Glad he's here, glad he's mashing, glad he's making it hard for prospects to come up.  He's an important part of this team.

 

Your wife needs a lesson from Pickles's mom

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

A lot of us missed on O'Hearn.  Glad he's here, glad he's mashing, glad he's making it hard for prospects to come up.  He's an important part of this team.

He's a LH 1B. Our prospects aren't. Seems to me that he's more likely to be kept next year than people might realize, freeing up someone like Kjerstad for a trade.

I'm not guaranteeing this by any means, but it wouldn't shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

This one didn't age well.

In hindsight, Hosmer wouldn't have been referrable just based on age.

 

 

A lot of us missed on O'Hearn.  Glad he's here, glad he's mashing, glad he's making it hard for prospects to come up.  He's an important part of this team.

 

Yea..I wasn’t as vehement as others and I believed I mentioned that he did have some good batted ball data but it definitely was a signing that left most of us a little befuddled, especially because they were giving him gtd money and seemingly, a gtd roster spot (didn’t get it on OD but did shortly after) in a year where they were supposed to be contending.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

He's a LH 1B. Our prospects aren't. Seems to me that he's more likely to be kept next year than people might realize, freeing up someone like Kjerstad for a trade.

I'm not guaranteeing this by any means, but it wouldn't shock me.

It may just be semantics but they aren’t going to trade Kjerstad because OHearn is here.

They could elect to trade Kjerstad for pitching they need and perhaps knowing OHearn is here makes it easier to do that but I think they would prefer to have Kjerstad at his salary vs OHearn at his 2025 salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It may just be semantics but they aren’t going to trade Kjerstad because OHearn is here.

They could elect to trade Kjerstad for pitching they need and perhaps knowing OHearn is here makes it easier to do that but I think they would prefer to have Kjerstad at his salary vs OHearn at his 2025 salary.

Yeah. I don't think we're disagreeing, but O'Hearn being a decent 1b and LF bat fills two needs, whereas Kjerstad is really just a bat that they'll try to find a place to play. On the other hand, if Santander leaves, there's more room for both.

So I wouldn't trade Kjerstad straight up for O'Hearn, but the latter gives Elias some flexibility assume O'Hearn would resign at a pretty low price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2023 at 7:40 AM, Tony-OH said:

Nice reference. I wish he was Jim Dwyer. From 1981-1987 Dwyer slashed  .263/.360/.442/.801 for the Orioles.

Better than Dwyer? For the moment, I’d say it worked out. He has been a very good pinch hitter as advertised, too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It may just be semantics but they aren’t going to trade Kjerstad because OHearn is here.

They could elect to trade Kjerstad for pitching they need and perhaps knowing OHearn is here makes it easier to do that but I think they would prefer to have Kjerstad at his salary vs OHearn at his 2025 salary.

Overall, O’Hearn was a very slick pickup. Getting him to agree to the $3 million team option for 2025 was a slick move as well. He probably shouldn’t play RF, but stuff happens over a long season and we may see that again. I think the bad feelings of the Crush Davis contract rubbed off a little on O’Hearn. Just similar looking players. 

He’s not blocking Kjerstad. Kjerstad is our Santa replacement. Stowers is just being blocked because he’s LH and he’s behind the other LH hitting OF types in the MLB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Overall, O’Hearn was a very slick pickup. Getting him to agree to the $3 million team option for 2025 was a slick move as well. He probably shouldn’t play RF, but stuff happens over a long season and we may see that again. I think the bad feelings of the Crush Davis contract rubbed off a little on O’Hearn. Just similar looking players. 

He’s not blocking Kjerstad. Kjerstad is our Santa replacement. Stowers is just being blocked because he’s LH and he’s behind the other LH hitting OF types in the MLB. 

It's a $7.5m team option for 2025. I'm not sure the O's will pick it up.

Agreed that Kjerstad is blocked by Santander more than by O'Hearn though, and that O'Hearn and Kjerstad could coexist on the same roster in 2025. Quite a lot will change between now and then, I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm old enough to remember the days of arguing about :::swoon::: Kasey Kotchman, so I don't begrudge a lot of people "missing," on O'Hearn. Especially because it was totally reasonable to think that he wouldn't have been the impact player he has become. 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Good stuff here. Cano’s issue is simple imo…if he gets the ball up, it’s flat and extremely hittable. This was his issue last year and it remains his issues.    It is a bit unlucky to have that many homers on 12 fly balls but he’s also basically putting the ball on a tee when he’s up in the zone, so it’s not surprising the ball gets crushed.
    • Akin is a dime a dozen reliever that is capable of being really good or really bad. If you cut him today, you wouldn’t notice he was gone.
    • In terms of on the field and strictly talking about players, my biggest concern/question was the bullpen and it still is. However, the biggest question that I felt was looming over this team and the organization as a whole was how many young players is too many and when do you bring these guys up? In a year of contention, how many guys do you want “learning on the job” while still focusing on winning?     These are not easy decisions to make, especially when you have competent vet players that should produce at a level that helps the team, even if you feel the young players are more talented. Fast forward to right now.  Holliday came up and struggled and he controls his path to get back.  Mayo may have been close to a call up but he got hurt.  Now, he may be looking at late July/early August before he’s a factor here. Cowser has cemented himself as an everyday player despite his poor and unlucky numbers this month. But he takes arguably the best at bats on the team, is hitting the ball hard and is playing very good defense. Stowers is potentially getting himself in at least a role as the strong side platoon player in the OF. Kjerstad came up and was up and down but he he only had a few sporadic at bats and wasn’t given the proper chance. The other side to this are the vets and many of them have had a lot of issues.  Hays has been awful outside of that glimmer of hope for a few days when he came back off the IL.   He has an OPS+ of 28, a wRC+ of 24, to go along with mediocre at best statcast numbers. Mullins isn’t much better.  His statcast numbers are poor, his OPS+ is 68 and his wRC+ is 65. He is still playing good defense, so that’s good but he hasn’t been good with the bat at all. Santander is hitting 203 and has a sub 300 OBP. He has two 3 hit games this year and if you take those away, he’s hitting 158 And his OPS is closer to 600 than 700. Urias has been surpassed by Mateo and is barely playing and when he is playing, he’s not hitting at all. Mateo has exceeded expectations and looks like he should keep the UTI role this year but we all know the offensive downturn is very likely coming and going off the idea that he is 5 for his last 31, that downturn may have already started.  Still, he has a role here. Mountcastle and OHearn have been up and down but have remained relatively steady to the point where they playing them the amount they are, isn’t really hurting the team. Luckily the team is realizing they aren’t everyday guys, so that helps. I believe Santander will get things going but I’m becoming more and more skeptical about Hays and Mullins.  Mullins is showing some signs lately and has been much better than Hays and the team is playing him less, so I guess that’s good. But Hays is a problem. They need his RH bat but he’s not hitting anything and he’s swinging at awful pitches and he has largely been awful for the last 5 months of baseball. The question of, how much youth is too much is being answered and the answer is, there isn’t “too much” if some of the vets are going to continue to be non factors. If I were the Os, I would send down Hays for Kjerstad or Norby. Norby needs to be able to play OF defense up here but if he can, his RH bat may be valuable. Holliday will be up once he gets hot, so that will take care of itself and like I said, Mayo has to get healthy and playing again. The starting pitching has been better than we thought, so they have been able to keep the team winning through some of these offensive droughts but when you have the talent the Os do in the minors, you can’t keep holding guys back as you hope for these vets to start hitting. The Os have rightfully recognized that none of these vets are everyday guys, so they have at least taken that away but it may be time to do more than that.
    • I’ll take the May version in relief.  
    • Also have to keep in mind that Cano has the toughest job on the team. He gets the middle of the order every time and those matchups are occasionally going to result in a crushing home run. His numbers look about like they did in the second half last year--not elite, but still very good. Needs to work on misses in the zone that get hit hard. 
    • I’d think we’d put him on the FCL roster. 6’3 180. Gotta love that frame. Think of the trade this way, Rodriguez probably is the equivalent of a 5th-7th rd draft pick in this upcoming draft. So we flipped Stallings, who had no role, for a 5th round pitcher with a higher ceiling. 
    • If they were both DH’s maybe
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...