Jump to content

Roger's Centre Moving Walls In


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Im also confused why any team would want a 357 power alley in RF. That is just ridiculously short. 366 in LF is almost as bad. Its old Camden Yards bad, which I thought was the shortest in baseball. 

Im guessing a few years or less they'll so how bad of an idea it was and change it back. Because IMO, it is a bad idea. 

Their fans must have voted for this or something.

Maybe they’re trying to see if Vlad Jr can hit 60+ home runs this season. I don’t get it either this would be like if Elias brought in the left field fence at OPACY last year instead of moving it further back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Maybe they’re trying to see if Vlad Jr can hit 60+ home runs this season. I don’t get it either this would be like if Elias brought in the left field fence at OPACY last year instead of moving it further back. 

Thats going to make 3 launching pads in the AL east now, Camden Yards a 4th if your LH'er. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jabba72 said:

Thats going to make 3 launching pads in the AL east now, Camden Yards a 4th if your LH'er. 

It's too early to say for sure, but I don't think Camden is much of a launching pad for LHHs now, it's just ok. Sure, you can pull fly balls onto the flag court, but not being able to hit opposite field home runs hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 9:19 AM, SpOkane said:

MLB should institute a new rule for every foot a wall is moved in the height of the wall increases so many inches.  And for every foot a wall is moved back the wall decreases so many inches.

The O's left field wall would be 8 feet underground.  On field seating will really provide a one of a kind experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The O's left field wall would be 8 feet underground.  On field seating will really provide a one of a kind experience.

Ohhh... now there's an idea. Instead of a wall you have a trench.  I like it.  The question is do you just paint a line at the edge, or have a little triangular thing marking the boundary like on a cricket oval?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 6:08 PM, spiritof66 said:

As you'll see from the article linked below, there have been a number of other exceptions granted, including those for Camden Yards and the new Yankee Stadium. In most of those cases, there was a practical reason for allowing a distance under the minimum. If that was the case in Toronto, I don't know what the reason was.  

https://www.closecallsports.com/2012/06/rule-104-note-minimum-field-dimensions.html

Yea, the "practical" reasons for the exemptions were we've designed the stadium this way because we thought it was cool, and how about we say it would be expensive and a pain in the butt to change the drawings now?

These are essentially $billion custom-designed stadiums and they're arguing that it's neigh impossible to move a fence back 3'. Yea, okay.  Camden Yards is 318' to RF because every stadium for the prior two decades had been a cookie cutter and they wanted to be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2023 at 7:58 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

Ohhh... now there's an idea. Instead of a wall you have a trench.  I like it.  The question is do you just paint a line at the edge, or have a little triangular thing marking the boundary like on a cricket oval?

Not a trench.  A moat.  With crocodiles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...