Jump to content

TT: It's time to bring up Colton Cowser


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

If Hays is hurt to the point that he has to sit out for a while I can see bringing up Cowser to play left.  But I have no concern about Hays defense.  He has had some weather related problems with wind and cold but overall I think he is still the same above average outfielder with a great arm.   Heck one of his misplays was overrunning a ball.  That does not relate to a poor jump or lose of speed.

Now if Elias wants to bring Cowser up to play Hays, Mullins and Cowser in some order, then that is another story.   I don't know if Elias will consider that Cowser has mastered AAA yet.   He was not great in AAA last year and he has only 96 PAs in AAA this season.    Its kind of a decision on when Elias has seen enough to think he is ready.   I can see where you are coming from though Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Terrin Vavra leads the team in DH appearances (ridiculous BTW) so it makes some sense to send to move Hays to RF, Santander to DH and bring up Cowser to play LF. Vavra can be optioned.

 

Totally agree, but Vavra only has one DH appearance this season. Adley is leading with 7 I think. I'm guessing you're counting last year as well?

Regardless, this is the way to do it. Vavra optioned and shifting Hays to RF. Of course it makes way too much sense so it definitely won't happen. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this works. Some ABs will have to be taken away from Hays, Santander and Mullins but it will keep those guys a little fresher as the games pile up. Should make the team stronger overall - offensively and defensively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m convinced!  But I’ve been in Cowser’s corner when y’all were questioning! ;)
 

Vavra’s SSS over the last 2 seasons hasn’t proven enough.  Plus Cowser’s OF defense is an upgrade.  He’s riding a psychological high.  And has hit LHP in his 17 PAs to the tune of a .887 OPS (sort of answering that question).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s time to replace Vavra, or O’Hearn, with Wesbturg.  There is a clear playing path for Cowser and Westburg. Westburg can play some 2B/3B/DH vs LHP. 

That's a clear path? Both should be playing pretty much every day if called up. I think both are ready, the question is whether the team is ready. 

Unless either can pitch I don't really see what need they would fill. That said, I would certainly be excited to see them. I just can't help thinking we would be better off trading Hays, Santander, or 

One more consideration is that both would require 40 man moves. Who are the two position players we are willing to lose off the 40 man? It looks pretty crowded. Vavra and McKenna? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely agree. I like Vavra but we simply have higher upside players ready for those PAs both in the outfield (Cowser, Stowers) and the infield (Westburg, Ortiz). 

We're getting a .683 OPS out of DH by the way. The worst of any position besides 2b so far. That includes a 1.0222 OPS in 7 games from Adley at DH, so suffice to say the other guys rotating in there are not getting the job done so far. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was shocked by Hays’ poor defense in the first 7-10 days, but it seems to me like he’s righted the ship.   I’d like to keep an eye on this for a few more weeks before pulling the trigger on a move like this.   I do think the data Tony cited about Hays’ burst and jump are a concern.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...