Jump to content

Grayson Optioned


waroriole

Recommended Posts

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Weird, I remember most everyone agreeing with the decision to send him down after having a horrible spring.

Maybe that's because I was saying it before Spring Training was over and before the decision was made. I was saying it after the 2nd time he got rocked in the 4th inning. So maybe 2nd week of March? I don't remember precise timing. I also didn't get approved to join here until after Spring Training was over. So as mentioned previously, it wasn't on the Message Board here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Work on mechanics and command and don't promote him again until he has some sustained success.

I'd imagine they want to control his innings a little bit.  I was wondering what their plans were in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Maybe that's because I was saying it before Spring Training was over and before the decision was made. I was saying it after the 2nd time he got rocked in the 4th inning. So maybe 2nd week of March? I don't remember precise timing. I also didn't get approved to join here until after Spring Training was over. So as mentioned previously, it wasn't on the Message Board here.

The sentiment here shifted from cautiously optimistic to alarm bells going off around 3rd week of March. I think most of the board understood it was a real possibility he wouldn't make it and I don't think anyone was laughing. So maybe "everyone" except everyone on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Its fine.     He was never going to pitch every 5th or 6th day for 185 days, and it'll be a benefit to acquire Club control of 2029.    

Grayson had a path to earn his FA after 2028, and couldn't muster the performances needed to hold it.

I'd still bet on him as the likeliest Game 1 starter in October if we get there, though in the first round I wouldn't expect any Oriole Arm to face more than 18 batters unless one of those laughers we never get.

You must really believe in a serious turnaround by him while at AAA. Because they is NOTHING about what he has done this season that suggest any trust for any playoff appearance for him this year. 

You also must not believe in the front office’s ability to acquire an upgrade in the rotation with all of these assets/prospects at the deadline.

Kudos to you for the supreme confidence in Grayson!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kaj21206 said:

I can't argue against his demotion, but I wonder if having him pitch in long relief when he was recalled would have been more beneficial.  I still think that helps young pitchers become acclimated to MLB.  It's just not done anymore.

Pitching in middle relief would do nothing for him to f he can’t command his pitches. He would just get lit up coming out of the bullpen. Until he gets better fastball command, he is not a Major League pitcher. If/when he does though, look out sky’s the limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Well, he also has not been very successful at developing pitching.

Bradish is probably the best example of taking a guy with a good arm and developing him into a decent starter. Kremer probably could be in that category as well to an extent. Maybe if you want, you can add in Tyler Wells, but was basically developed at the major league level vs the system.

The Orioles do strange things in "developing" starters in that they piggy back them, bring them in relief sometimes, suddenly give them a one or two inning start, and rarely letting them go over 80 pitches in any outing.

Neither Grayson or DL Hall have developed much under them and they were the best two arms they had. The only highly paid guy they drafted and have tried to develop is Baumler and he can't stay healthy.

They have put all their eggs in the position prospect basket but won't trade any of the ones that end up with value but prefer to stack them at AAA while playing veterans at the major league level.

If you can't develop an arm like Rodriguez and Hall, you have to question your pitching development guys. 

 

 

Tony, reason would suggest based upon where we will probably be in the standings at the trading deadline window and with the over abundance of position prospects, a trade has to be forthcoming at some point right?

At some point Elias will pull the trigger I have to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect he goes down and starts but they limit his innings to shorter stints for 3 or 4 games.  Try to pitch 2-3 good innings then go to 4, 5 and beyond.  That way they limit his innings.   Look at what happened to Bradish last year.  His was a so called injury but he came back the second half and has been pretty consistent since.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be an issue he has. But the biggest issue is that he can’t pitch to spots. And that won’t play at this level, especially not against good Major League hitters.

Most of the time consistently it was either pitches middle middle OR way out of the zone that were not competitive. How many times did he get ahead 0-2 and then proceed to throw 3 balls that weren’t even close to the zone and work the hitter back ahead in the count? How many 0-2 pitches were either right down the shoot or a foot to a foot and a half high OR in the dirt and missed badly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I can empathize with the folks who feel like they have a systematic problem developing pitching, I also think we are failing to acknowledge some successes. Look at how many waiver claims and rule 5 guys are on the pitching staff. It's a Hodgepodge of misfits from other organizations. And yet, somehow this organization has helped them to become adequate pitchers in the big eagles. In 2022 we witnessed Tyler Wells, Cionel Perez, Felix Bautista, Austin Voth, and Bryan Baker, just to name a few, complete their seasons successfully. Most of those guys have continued with it this year, and they've managed to develop Yennier Cano into one of the most dominant relief pitchers in baseball.

In the starting rotation, we've witnessed Dean Kremer and Kyle Bradish have extremely successful completions of their 2022 seasons.

I can understand the frustration of not having fully developed good starting pitchers since Mike Mussina, or maybe even Sydney Ponson & Eric Bedard if we want to be generous, but since then it was all different regimes in the front office with very little infrastructure.

A baseball player is only human. Baseball is hard. 99% of the people who ever play baseball won't even make it to the Big Leagues. It's even more difficult to have a long successful career once they get there.

I think we should be fair and acknowledge where there has been success, and hope they can continue to improve and develop as an organization to help our pitchers become better versions of themselves.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You look at Grayson’s game log, he pitched 10 games, 5 of which were pretty good (0-2 ER) and 5 of which were below average to awful.  He only had consecutive bad outings once, in his 2nd/3rd starts.   I’m fine with sending him down until he can get more consistent, but it’s not like he was awful all the time up here.  He’ll be back.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Or you could say that you can see why Elias favors hitters because the systems he has put into place are much better at developing them.

Bryce Miller was a 4th round pick in 2021.  You see what he's managed to do so far?

Other teams manage to develop pitching.

I was intent on reading the entire thread, however you comment made me think a bit. The Orioles have been pretty great at developing bullpen arms for the last 10 years or finding them and turning them around. They have been pretty decent at scabbing together some starting pitchers and diamonds in the rough but have developed anyone since maybe the 90s. How is it they can pull someone from the Mexican league and make them pretty darn good for a year or two, or fix a certain mechanical issue with a fairly veteran guy but can’t seem to take a player from draft to top of the line pitcher?  (Thinking “out loud”) Maybe it isn’t simply evaluating a draft prospect pitcher and plugging him into a system and rather, it is super difficult to be a top ten starter and those special few just kind of need to find their own way and own grove. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...