Jump to content

If you could only keep one of these 2 players...


Billy F-Face3

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

If you could only keep 1, and you had to choose between Jorge Mateo and Ramon Urias, who are you keeping on the Orioles? And why?

This is purely for a hypothetical trade scenario.

Urias and it really isn't close for me.  Much more steady of a player,  rarely gives away at bats.   Less flashy, but much more solid and consistent. 

Edited by forphase1
Added why.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

More consistent?  Urias average OBP slugging and Ops by month over last two seasons.

April 22   .194/.239/.224/.463

May 22.   .260/.309/.477/.787

june 22.    .167/.211/.556/.766

July 22.     .329/.380/.575/.955

August 22  .221/.262/.368/.631

Sept. 22     .258/.370/.371/.741

April 23      .261/.354/.348/.702

May 23       .222/.300/.278/.578

Urias is a great defender and is versatile but  has no speed, doesn’t hit for great average, doesn’t hit for many extra base hits and up and down.  He will be 29 this week so we know who he is.  
 

Mateo has tools other guys in the system don’t have with top level speed, and excellent defense.  You basically have another Urias in the system in Ortiz that can do the same type things with the glove and has higher upside with bat imo.  If we could swap Urias for a quality left handed reliever I would do it in a heart beat and let Ortiz take his utility role.  

Yes, more consistent.  His lowest OPS in that list you posted was .463 and highest was .955.  Compare that to Mateo who just over the past 2 months has a high of 1.044 and a low of .285!  If you removed the highest and lowest for Urias, he has had between .578 and .787 every month.  Mateo, over the same span and also throwing out his highest and lowest, had had a high of .819 and a low of .502.  So yeah, overall Urias is more consistent overall than Mateo.  Certainly never as good as Mateo on his best, but also not as ice cold as Mateo can get for an extended period, more or less.  Honestly I don't want either starting on a regular basis and think the team will be better over all when one or both are not on the team any longer or are in a pure utility/substitution role.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

More consistent?  Urias average OBP slugging and Ops by month over last two seasons.

April 22   .194/.239/.224/.463

May 22.   .260/.309/.477/.787

june 22.    .167/.211/.556/.766

July 22.     .329/.380/.575/.955

August 22  .221/.262/.368/.631

Sept. 22     .258/.370/.371/.741

April 23      .261/.354/.348/.702

May 23       .222/.300/.278/.578

Urias is a great defender and is versatile but  has no speed, doesn’t hit for great average, doesn’t hit for many extra base hits and up and down.  He will be 29 this week so we know who he is.  
 

Mateo has tools other guys in the system don’t have with top level speed, and excellent defense.  You basically have another Urias in the system in Ortiz that can do the same type things with the glove and has higher upside with bat imo.  If we could swap Urias for a quality left handed reliever I would do it in a heart beat and let Ortiz take his utility role.  

How about over the course of a career...not just last year:

Mar/Apr - .289/.307/.597

May - .331/.420/.752

June - .333/.649/.982

July - .374/.477/.851

Aug - .297/.398/.695

Sept/Oct - .400/.414/.814

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bpilktree said:

More consistent?  Urias average OBP slugging and Ops by month over last two seasons.

April 22   .194/.239/.224/.463

May 22.   .260/.309/.477/.787

june 22.    .167/.211/.556/.766

July 22.     .329/.380/.575/.955

August 22  .221/.262/.368/.631

Sept. 22     .258/.370/.371/.741

April 23      .261/.354/.348/.702

May 23       .222/.300/.278/.578

Urias is a great defender and is versatile but  has no speed, doesn’t hit for great average, doesn’t hit for many extra base hits and up and down.  He will be 29 this week so we know who he is.  
 

Mateo has tools other guys in the system don’t have with top level speed, and excellent defense.  You basically have another Urias in the system in Ortiz that can do the same type things with the glove and has higher upside with bat imo.  If we could swap Urias for a quality left handed reliever I would do it in a heart beat and let Ortiz take his utility role.  

Why do folks follow up "gut feel" comments with amazing facts to the contrary??

Well done with the analysis.  That's not very consistent at all.  Right now, I'd trade both of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I agree with that and he's only two years out of high school. If Holliday gets back to his pre-call up stat line as you mentioned then he deserves serious consideration to be back on the Orioles roster. For now Mayo and Norby are deserving of being called up if the Orioles want to bring up a player from Norfolk.
    • I just want to riff on the term “elite athlete.”   To me, different people have different ideas of what level of quality is “elite,” and what it means to be an “athlete.”    For some people, “elite” means top 10% of the whole populace, for others it means top 0.1% of people who play professional sports.   Some people consider you “athletic” if you are very well coordinated and have good ability to learn skills, others don’t consider you “athletic” unless you could hold your own in the Olympic decathlon.   So a lot of times, people arguing about whether someone is an “elite athlete” are really talking past each other because they don’t ageee on what the term means.   To me, most pro sports players are elite athletes, and it’s just a matter of how elite they are.   In the case of Holliday, he’s athletic enough to be an awesome baseball player, and that’s elite enough for me.    
    • Locked on Orioles podcast reviews 6 rental relievers (contract for only this year) who the O's could trade for. 6.  John Brebbia, White Sox 5.  Adam Ottavino, Mets 4.  Carlos Estevez, Angels 3.  Paul Sewald, D Backs 2.  Yimi Garcia, Blue Jays 1.  David Robertson, Rangers Listed in the order they appear in the video, which is also the host's view of their value--increasing to Robertson at the top.
    • https://www.fangraphs.com/players/dean-kremer/19350/splits-tool?position=P&splitArr=&splitArrPitch=&autoPt=false&splitTeams=false&statType=player&statgroup=1&startDate=2002-01-01&endDate=2024-11-01&players=&filter=&groupBy=month&wxTemperature=&wxPressure=&wxAirDensity=&wxElevation=&wxWindSpeed=&sort=-1%2C1 Bah, the link doesn't seem to be working. Go to splits, select by month and then go to advanced. 2024: Mar/Apr:  5.25 May:  4.05 July:  1.16
    • Want to sweep this series. But 2/3 isn't the end of the world.
    • Right. It’s a screwup on their part. 
    • The last column is IRS, which means “inherited runners scored”  Inherited runners would be IR and I am surprised that I didn’t see it anywhere in that column. This particular site has a different set of initials, IRS means inherited runners scored. I don’t think that can possibly be correct, because that would be a huge number.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...