Jump to content

6/3 Roster Moves: Tate to 60 day IL, Coulombe to BL, Lester recalled


Morgan423

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Winter said:

why Lester. 

I'm guessing it's for Father's Day.

Dude looks like a 40 year old father of four.

 

current

 

6'3" 180 pounds eh....?

I will say big props for making to the majors as a 13th round draft pick.

Edited by Can_of_corn
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Winter said:

why Lester. 

Really good question.   To torment all the people to want to see Westburg?  Elias is trolling us now.  

Maybe one of the O’s 1B/3B has some minor tweak that won’t put them on the IL but will make them unavailable for 2-3 days.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Really good question.   To torment all the people to want to see Westburg?  Elias is trolling us now.  

Maybe one of the O’s 1B/3B has some minor tweak that won’t put them on the IL but will make them unavailable for 2-3 days.  

 

He's probably going to only be up for a few days and Elias isn't worried about losing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He's probably going to only be up for a few days and Elias isn't worried about losing him.

Good point. At first I was like WTF, what about Westburg?? Makes total sense now since Columbe will be back in a few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Because Coulombe will miss only 2 games. Would not be surprised  he is DFA’d in a couple of days. 

Right, but for example, why not bring up Ortiz, or another reliever?  I guess maybe this is the 5-opinion limit deterring those moves.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually wrote out a moderately long post last night about how Lester (and Diaz too) were performing in AAA and how Mountcastle should look over his shoulder. I decided not to post it because I thought it was going to pump too much critical/negative energy into the discussion and I didn't want to add to the negativity in anything regarding Mounty. He gets too much of that already as it is.

But to mention Lester, in my OOTP simulation I just finished the season with an interesting development. Mountcastle got injured late in the season (Broken knee cap / end of his season) so I brought up Lester to take his place. The Orioles still ended up going to the World Series with Lester as the starting 1st Baseman. (I traded O'Hearn away before the trade deadline to dump his salary). They faced the Dodgers in the World Series and lost the series 4-2.

That's a computer program and not reality, but it is fun to watch things that happen and compare it to real life. All Lester has been doing in Norfolk is smashing home runs.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Lester, shouldn't he still have options?  He started in pro ball in 2015, but he didn't get called up to the big leagues until last year, when the Tigers gave him his debut. 

So surely he's only used one option?  If so, we don't need to DFA him when we send him back down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Doubtful we see Tate this year. 

He's been dealing with this since November. In my uneducated but somewhat educated opinion, I feel like would be getting ready to start throwing at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...