Jump to content

Official 2023 MLB Draft


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, baltfan said:

Lots of pitchers going even though the track record is so much tougher.  Interesting.  

It's really just a group of three or four college guys and one or two high school pitchers and then the top-tier pool is tapped. That's probably why you're seeing a bit of a run on it, but it'll presumably peter out real soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 WAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 WAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
    • Trumbo was a DH impersonating a fielder, Santander is just a very poor fielder. It's not a perfect comp (is there really even such a thing?) but he is an absolutely relevant comp for this team in this situation. He is the poster child for why taking the draft pick and moving on is the right choice. And Santander is still a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier.
    • To this end I feel like we always had a pretty short leash with him. From the first three starts as an oriole to the yo-yo-ing this year. I would have preferred we just left him in the #5 starter role and see what happened. And maybe he’ll get that opportunity elsewhere like you said, whereas here it always seemed like his role was changing. 
    • Santander to Trumbo isn't as good a comparison as you think. Their raw stats are fairly similar but Trumbo played in a much more offensive era.  Santander is a much better athlete, defender and consistent player than Trumbo was.
    • I'd rather he not brazenly cheat like Cruz did lol. Also, Cruz hit for average and got on base (.277 career AVG, .343 career OBP), which are definitely not tools in Santander's toolbox (.246 career AVG, .307 career OBP).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...