Jump to content

2023 18th Round Pick (#541): Tanner Witt - RHP - (Jr) Texas (TX)


Recommended Posts

Another selling point for the Orioles is the fact that he would potentially get a year head start on reaching arbitration and free agency.  That could well end up being worth far more in the long run to Witt than the possibility of getting more slot money in next year's draft.  That, coupled with perhaps being able to cobble together enough slot savings to offer him a decent bonus just might do it.  This would actually be betting on himself in a bigger way for Witt, taking the long view.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Another selling point for the Orioles is the fact that he would potentially get a year head start on reaching arbitration and free agency.  That could well end up being worth far more in the long run to Witt than the possibility of getting more slot money in next year's draft.  That, coupled with perhaps being able to cobble together enough slot savings to offer him a decent bonus just might do it.  This would actually be betting on himself in a bigger way for Witt, taking the long view.

Or...maybe the kid wants to finish college.  At this point, I'd have to say he's heavily leaning toward staying with that tweet.  Maybe he likes the college experience and he is fine betting on himself to bounce back next year. 

I'm hoping they can sign him.   I think Elias can sell the organization and emphasize to him how important it would be to become a pro now AND give him a nice chunk of change.    Pro teams have resources that colleges just can't provide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good article re: how the Orioles might create space for signings.  I can't see how they get there to get Witt though.  There just doesn't seem to be enough money left to get it done.  I doubt they are getting much of a discount from Bradfield since Elias had no direct contact with him prior to the draft, though he did apparently speak with the agent.  If Elias had cut a deal with Bradfield prior to the draft, I would think there would be more contact between them and Bradfield would not have been surprised when he was picked. If Bradfield isn't discounting substantially, there just isn't that much money to be saved from the other picks.  

With Orioles draft done, the next task is signing the picks - Camden Chat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Another selling point for the Orioles is the fact that he would potentially get a year head start on reaching arbitration and free agency.  That could well end up being worth far more in the long run to Witt than the possibility of getting more slot money in next year's draft.  That, coupled with perhaps being able to cobble together enough slot savings to offer him a decent bonus just might do it.  This would actually be betting on himself in a bigger way for Witt, taking the long view.

At the rate the O's promote pitchers it might be faster to go back to school and end up with a different team next year.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AdleysPecks said:

Ha. I like their content but it’s like listening to Jim Hunter at times. Fanboys is a good characterization 😂😂😂

They get some good guests on their their podcasts and they do follow the system closely.   I don’t see the hosts as having any scouting chops and they’re very reluctant to say anything negative, but t still enjoy the podcast when I listen to it   You just need to take what they say with a heavy grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Paul in Virginia said:

Maybe a dumb question: why didn't we just draft this guy much earlier in the draft?

Paying 70% of MSRP isn't as good as paying 15% of MSRP, but isn't 70% still a very solid value?

Because if you pick a guy early and don't sign him you lose the associated slot money.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Paul in Virginia said:

Maybe a dumb question: why didn't we just draft this guy much earlier in the draft?

Paying 70% of MSRP isn't as good as paying 15% of MSRP, but isn't 70% still a very solid value?

They would have had to draft him at #53 or #63 and maybe still go over slot and maybe either didn’t have a feel that he would sign for that slot or that the health/performance question marks were too great to risk a higher pick on him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

They would have had to draft him at #53 or #63 and maybe still go over slot and maybe either didn’t have a feel that he would sign for that slot or that the health/performance question marks were too great to risk a higher pick on him.

Excellent points, but I have to think it's easier to obtain a yes/no answer (pre-draft) from a mid-50s pick than it is with a guy at the tail end of the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paul in Virginia said:

Excellent points, but I have to think it's easier to obtain a yes/no answer (pre-draft) from a mid-50s pick than it is with a guy at the tail end of the draft.

Agreed, which makes me think they were more comfortable taking Baumeister that high but not Witt.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Love moves like this. This is how you can get these types of guys signed.

I imagine if the Orioles really felt strongly about Witt they would have tried to set it up this way. However, it also isn’t so easy when you pick 17th in Round 11.  You don’t know if he will be around and maybe there weren’t 16 other guys they liked enough to do senior signs.  Finally, maybe they aren’t that high on Witt compared to guys that they took. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Kiley McDaniel:

. Texas RHP Tanner Witt (73; late-first talent out of HS who returned from Tommy John surgery this year and things never clicked) is headed back to school and prep SS Kollin Ritchie (293; powerful left-handed hitter who hasn't faced much top pitching) is another tough sign who I don't expect will sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...