Jump to content

2023 18th Round Pick (#541): Tanner Witt - RHP - (Jr) Texas (TX)


Recommended Posts

Another selling point for the Orioles is the fact that he would potentially get a year head start on reaching arbitration and free agency.  That could well end up being worth far more in the long run to Witt than the possibility of getting more slot money in next year's draft.  That, coupled with perhaps being able to cobble together enough slot savings to offer him a decent bonus just might do it.  This would actually be betting on himself in a bigger way for Witt, taking the long view.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Another selling point for the Orioles is the fact that he would potentially get a year head start on reaching arbitration and free agency.  That could well end up being worth far more in the long run to Witt than the possibility of getting more slot money in next year's draft.  That, coupled with perhaps being able to cobble together enough slot savings to offer him a decent bonus just might do it.  This would actually be betting on himself in a bigger way for Witt, taking the long view.

Or...maybe the kid wants to finish college.  At this point, I'd have to say he's heavily leaning toward staying with that tweet.  Maybe he likes the college experience and he is fine betting on himself to bounce back next year. 

I'm hoping they can sign him.   I think Elias can sell the organization and emphasize to him how important it would be to become a pro now AND give him a nice chunk of change.    Pro teams have resources that colleges just can't provide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good article re: how the Orioles might create space for signings.  I can't see how they get there to get Witt though.  There just doesn't seem to be enough money left to get it done.  I doubt they are getting much of a discount from Bradfield since Elias had no direct contact with him prior to the draft, though he did apparently speak with the agent.  If Elias had cut a deal with Bradfield prior to the draft, I would think there would be more contact between them and Bradfield would not have been surprised when he was picked. If Bradfield isn't discounting substantially, there just isn't that much money to be saved from the other picks.  

With Orioles draft done, the next task is signing the picks - Camden Chat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Another selling point for the Orioles is the fact that he would potentially get a year head start on reaching arbitration and free agency.  That could well end up being worth far more in the long run to Witt than the possibility of getting more slot money in next year's draft.  That, coupled with perhaps being able to cobble together enough slot savings to offer him a decent bonus just might do it.  This would actually be betting on himself in a bigger way for Witt, taking the long view.

At the rate the O's promote pitchers it might be faster to go back to school and end up with a different team next year.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AdleysPecks said:

Ha. I like their content but it’s like listening to Jim Hunter at times. Fanboys is a good characterization 😂😂😂

They get some good guests on their their podcasts and they do follow the system closely.   I don’t see the hosts as having any scouting chops and they’re very reluctant to say anything negative, but t still enjoy the podcast when I listen to it   You just need to take what they say with a heavy grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Paul in Virginia said:

Maybe a dumb question: why didn't we just draft this guy much earlier in the draft?

Paying 70% of MSRP isn't as good as paying 15% of MSRP, but isn't 70% still a very solid value?

Because if you pick a guy early and don't sign him you lose the associated slot money.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Paul in Virginia said:

Maybe a dumb question: why didn't we just draft this guy much earlier in the draft?

Paying 70% of MSRP isn't as good as paying 15% of MSRP, but isn't 70% still a very solid value?

They would have had to draft him at #53 or #63 and maybe still go over slot and maybe either didn’t have a feel that he would sign for that slot or that the health/performance question marks were too great to risk a higher pick on him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

They would have had to draft him at #53 or #63 and maybe still go over slot and maybe either didn’t have a feel that he would sign for that slot or that the health/performance question marks were too great to risk a higher pick on him.

Excellent points, but I have to think it's easier to obtain a yes/no answer (pre-draft) from a mid-50s pick than it is with a guy at the tail end of the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paul in Virginia said:

Excellent points, but I have to think it's easier to obtain a yes/no answer (pre-draft) from a mid-50s pick than it is with a guy at the tail end of the draft.

Agreed, which makes me think they were more comfortable taking Baumeister that high but not Witt.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Love moves like this. This is how you can get these types of guys signed.

I imagine if the Orioles really felt strongly about Witt they would have tried to set it up this way. However, it also isn’t so easy when you pick 17th in Round 11.  You don’t know if he will be around and maybe there weren’t 16 other guys they liked enough to do senior signs.  Finally, maybe they aren’t that high on Witt compared to guys that they took. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Kiley McDaniel:

. Texas RHP Tanner Witt (73; late-first talent out of HS who returned from Tommy John surgery this year and things never clicked) is headed back to school and prep SS Kollin Ritchie (293; powerful left-handed hitter who hasn't faced much top pitching) is another tough sign who I don't expect will sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Jered Weaver!! How's that for a random 10+ year old pull? Sadly, he might be the only one! But yes, there has been at least 1.
    • Gametime:  7:45 pm EDT Forecast:  86 degrees, partly cloudy, windy, small chance of rain Matchup:  Kyle Bradish (R) vs Lance Lynn (R) Lineups SS  Gunnar Henderson L C   Adley Rutschman S DH  Ryan O'Hearn L 3B  Jordan Westburg R LF  Colton Cowser L 1B  Ryan Mountcastle R CF  Cedric Mullins L RF  Kyle Stowers L 2B  Jorge Mateo R 3B  Brendan Donovan L RF  Lars Nootbaar L 1B  Paul Goldschmidt R DH  Nolan Arenado R LF  Alec Burleson L C   Ivan Herrera R 2B  Nolan Gorman L SS  Masyn Winn R CF  Mike Siani L Orioles Bench Austin Hays (R) James McCann (R) Anthony Santander (S) -- bruised knee could inhibit ability to play the field Ramon Urias (R)   Orioles Bullpen Available Yennier Cano (R)  0.1 IP, 5p Saturday;  0.2 IP, 3p Friday Danny Coulombe (L)   0.1 IP, 10p Saturday Craig Kimbrel  (R)   1.0 IP, 14p Sunday Jacob Webb (R)    0.0 IP, 11p Sunday;  0.1 IP, 14p Friday  Probably Available Cole Irvin (L)  2.0 IP, 13p  Sunday Maybe Available Keegan Akin (L)   1.1 IP, 15p last night;  1.0 IP, 11p Friday Probably Not Available Albert Suarez (R)   1.0 IP, 24p last night;  0.2 IP, 15p Saturday Not Available Cionel Perez (L)   1.2 IP, 36p last night;  1.2 IP, 32p Saturday
    • Wow. “Near-ready starter” and consideration in the top 100 based on a breakout in 17.1 IP in AA as a 25 year old? I’d love to see it obviously, but that seems really going out on a limb. Young hasn’t pitched nearly enough in his whole professional career to suggest he can hold up under a full SP workload, or sustain this velo bump. I’m excited for Young and this only reinforces my thought that the Orioles might have something here, but my hopes are still just for a healthy season and maybe he becomes a RP option in 2025. 
    • Yesterday Max Bay was Eno's guest.   I'd known the name as Eno often described him as the mathy co-parent of Stuff+ but it was new to me in the video he'd been a 1-time member of the Astros analytics department.
    • It’s starting to feel like if we don’t get Gunnar signed, the rest of it won’t even matter. We have a lot of good players and several that are extension worthy as has been outlined in many posts. But Gunnar is in another stratosphere even from the best of the other guys. The talent, the results (already, not to mention the likely improvement or at least potential for that in the next few years) good health so far with the body type that should maintain - the kid is an outright superstar, and I just don’t think that is true of the rest of these guys.  I love Westburg, Adley, Colton, Jackson, Grayson. Hell I love this team. But Gunnar is The Guy and it’s not even remotely close.    Surely there is a Boras client in the history of Boras clients who has signed early?  Give the dude a blank check as far as I’m concerned. 
    • I'd target Westburg first.  He should be more amendable and affordable and might serve as a sign to his teammates that the O's are serious about keeping a core together for an extended run.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...