Jump to content

2023 18th Round Pick (#541): Tanner Witt - RHP - (Jr) Texas (TX)


Recommended Posts

Feels a lot like the Carter Young pick last year, in that he was also considered to be a potential 1st rounder who has a terrible year and was widely expected to go back to school. Makes sense to take a guy like that at the end of the draft so that you can sink some money into it if you find yourself with it. They got Young signed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

As I wrote in the Day 3 thread earlier, this pick just made some sense. I believe his dad does still work for the Orioles. Maybe he wants to go back and potentially be a first round pick in 2024, or perhaps he is ready to begin his pro career in an organization he feels comfortable with. I hope it is the latter. 

He was projected to be a first round pick until the TJ. He generally has very good command, but struggled this spring in his comeback from the surgery.

The Kollin Ritchie pick is very interesting to me as well. Maybe they actually plan on signing one of them, for a figure somewhere around $1M. 

Great call and pick.  High hopes for Tanner.

Edited by Greg Pappas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

As I wrote in the Day 3 thread earlier, this pick just made some sense. I believe his dad does still work for the Orioles. Maybe he wants to go back and potentially be a first round pick in 2024, or perhaps he is ready to begin his pro career in an organization he feels comfortable with. I hope it is the latter. 

He was projected to be a first round pick until the TJ. He generally has very good command, but struggled this spring in his comeback from the surgery.

The Kollin Ritchie pick is very interesting to me as well. Maybe they actually plan on signing one of them, for a figure somewhere around $1M. 

I thought the Witt that worked for the Orioles was Doug Witt (who no longer works for the Orioles), and that Tanner’s father is Kevin Witt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

This is every bit as good as getting an overslot Hs kid..but can they sign him?

The Orioles are going to need to find an awfully large amount of saving to sign him. My guess is he only signs if they fail to sign someone else (like occurred last year). With NIL money it will be hard to pay him more then he can make at Texas next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, seak05 said:

The Orioles are going to need to find an awfully large amount of saving to sign him. My guess is he only signs if they fail to sign someone else (like occurred last year). With NIL money it will be hard to pay him more then he can make at Texas next year. 

I just don’t  know how much NIL money there is for him though.

I think it’s tough to sign him because it’s very likely he sees a significant jump in draft position next year.

I would guess 1.5-2M would get him signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling they are going to get this done.

They didn’t draft him thinking he was going to sign cheaply. They know he has a number. Now, it may be something they are willing to pay but need to figure others out first and if they doesn’t go to plan, maybe they miss out on Witt but I think if they can come up with 2nd round-ish slot money, they get it done and I think they are good with that.

It’s finding the savings throughout their picks. I say they save 500k-1M with Bradfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I have a feeling they are going to get this done.

They didn’t draft him thinking he was going to sign cheaply. They know he has a number. Now, it may be something they are willing to pay but need to figure others out first and if they doesn’t go to plan, maybe they miss out on Witt but I think if they can come up with 2nd round-ish slot money, they get it done and I think they are good with that.

It’s finding the savings throughout their picks. I say they save 500k-1M with Bradfield. 

I hope they get it done.  If this guy was projected as a second round pick and he's going to end up getting second round slot money then why didn't a team just take him in the second round? Not saying it won't happen, but that's my reasoning. 

There has to be some kind of discount given his injury history.  Not saying we won't have to pay, but I'm thinking more 3rd roundish type money would be appropriate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

I hope they get it done.  If this guy was projected as a second round pick and he's going to end up getting second round slot money then why didn't a team just take him in the second round? Not saying it won't happen, but that's my reasoning. 

There has to be some kind of discount given his injury history.  Not saying we won't have to pay, but I'm thinking more 3rd roundish type money would be appropriate. 

But there is also a “I can go back to school and potentially up my value” tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I have a feeling they are going to get this done.

They didn’t draft him thinking he was going to sign cheaply. They know he has a number. Now, it may be something they are willing to pay but need to figure others out first and if they doesn’t go to plan, maybe they miss out on Witt but I think if they can come up with 2nd round-ish slot money, they get it done and I think they are good with that.

It’s finding the savings throughout their picks. I say they save 500k-1M with Bradfield. 

I hope you are correct about signing him, but I doubt there is much savings with Bradfield. He was supposed to go a little higher, Elias and Ciolek even commented that. OTOH, perhaps they called him and said something like, “Look, we’ll take you for 500K below our slot. Otherwise, we both know you’ll keep sliding.” Getting him 500 K below slot would be a steal at 1-17. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

I hope you are correct about signing him, but I doubt there is much savings with Bradfield. He was supposed to go a little higher, Elias and Ciolek even commented that. OTOH, perhaps they called him and said something like, “Look, we’ll take you for 500K below our slot. Otherwise, we both know you’ll keep sliding.” Getting him 500 K below slot would be a steal at 1-17. 

I don’t think it matters where he was “supposed to” go.

Is he going to go back to school, push back his pro career another year, risk injury, draft spot and maybe exposure of his game over 500k-1M?

I just don’t find it likely. 
 

Maybe he gets slot but it’s not necessary to do it to get him signed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No one would use the word "underachieve" to describe someone who didn't meet expectations due to injuries or circumstances beyond their control. Like that's just not what that word means in normal usage.  But technically, sure, Tiger Woods achieved less than was expected of him. Lol. 
    • This is a different team. Corbin Burnes would have made a difference IMO and we have now acquired him.  I am not dogmatic in believing that it has to be Miller and nothing/nobody else. I am saying that there is a serious argument to be made that Miller or another elite backend bullpen weapon is the piece to take us over the top when the Fall get's here. With a team this good who has legit WS aspirations with a strong argument to be made that we have the best team in the AL, I would hate for us to pin our WS hopes on a pitcher like Craig Kimbrel at this point in his career. IMO he is not good/reliable enough. If we have to get into a game (in October) where it turns into a battle of the bullpens, I would prefer not to have bring a knife to a gun fight.  
    • I appreciate this deep cut non-#10 Tejada. 
    • LOL.  Technically, he underachieved because of injury but I think most people equate underachiever with a lack of effort.  
    • I'm not sure if there are any hunters here, but it can be a pretty demanding full-body workout. I suspect Markakis wasn't sitting in a tree stand. I walk miles in rough terrain, good times.
    • I understand your argument, but I think your word choice of "underachieved" isn't helping. When it comes to a guy like Tiger, it's hard to call that guy an underachiever, especially when his work ethic is known and undeniable.  The guy can barely walk and he's still out there trying...that's not an underachiever. Underachieving, IMO (and I think what a lot of people think of when they hear the word) is when someone doesn't live up to to their potential, or work hard to maximize their potential...outside of being injured.   Plenty of things can de-rail a career, I don't think that means that individual is an underachiever.  I don't think Griffey is an underachiever, I don't think Trout is, either.  I just think they haven't had the careers they might have had if they were able to stay healthy. When debating these things, it's helpful to have a definition of which to work with.  So while I agree with you that guys like Tiger, Trout, Griffey and others haven't had the careers they were supposed to have, that doesn't mean they were underachievers.  They just got de-railed...now some of that was their own doing, some of that is just the tolls of playing their sports.  
    • Well deserved. I would have liked to have seen him finish his whole career Baltimore, but mostly have seen him be able to play in the 2012 playoffs. I also appreciate that because of him I know what a kinkajou is.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...