Jump to content

ALDS Game 3: Keeping hope alive


SteveA

Recommended Posts

Just now, Billy F-Face3 said:

Story of the season right there. Load the bases up only to ground out and get 0 runs.

And your manager who only knows how to manage by the book takes the bat out of the hands of one of your best hitters during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orioles really know how to be a major let down.  Did not look good at the end of the year then totally crap the bed in the playoffs.  

Just embarrassed we could not even be competitive.  Couldnt even win one game.  Couldnt do anything.  Two starting pitchers go less than two innings.   

This is epic level letdown.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

He's going to be fine. Already is. He has had a bad series, but he will adjust as good young players do. I'm not worried about Adley at all, we just need some more consistent hitters who can do damage to add to our lineup.

Man I hope so. Superstars show up in the Postseason. Adley did not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though I am very disappointed with how this season ended (I am not one of those proud that the team had a winning season kind of fans, I want to win.) 

I see a silver lining in this. 1) We will no longer have expectations and a bar set so low that you can trip over it. 2) Angelos will no longer be able to hid his awfulness in the anonymity of irrelevance/losing. The will be pressure from the national media to properly support a winning team. 3) We see how far the going young/cheap/waiver wire approach can get us. In the end against the big boys you have to be able to match big gun for big gun. 4) Hopefully Elias has been able to evaluate what we need in order to get to the next level AND Angelos will support him.

IMO everything is not lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dunk35 said:

Man I hope so. Superstars show up in the Postseason. Adley did not. 

Adley cant throw.  Has limited power.   He is overrated.   The Orioles should never ever draft another 230 lb switch hitting catchers in the first round.   Waste lower round picks on catchers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billy F-Face3 said:

101 wins don't mean squat with getting swept, eliminated, and humiliated the first time you play a playoff series. They don't hand out participation rings. 

You said it was the story of the season. You are wrong, be a big boy and admit it was a dumb thing to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Texas is an elite defensive team. Just making no mistakes in the field.

To me their defense is what is the most surprising. 

 

I thought the book on Jung when he was drafted that he was "questionable" to stay longterm at 3B?  He is super solid there so far. Same with the rest of the IF and very simply they have 3 guys in the OF that either a natural CF or has over 150 games in CF like Garcia.

Having an elite D is a big part of why this SP looks OK even with the number of guys they have lost this year. Nobody really talks too much about it because they mash, but thier D is a huge reason why they are were they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You bring up a great observation about the Lightning. They are in the same city and are not a small market. I would argue that the reason why is because they have managed to capture the hearts/attention of the marketplace. IMO you don't do that by allowing your fans to carry constant anxiety about who's going to be here this year and who will be gone. Of course there is roster turnover in all pro and college sports. But there also has to be some stability and confidence amongst your fans/customers that the org is as invested as me (Joe Blow the fan) and not indifferent (won't do what it takes for us/team to win it all).  
    • Is that the best model to pattern after? The outlier? Elias does not and should not ever have to go "all in on one season". I've never been sure what that realistically looks like other than a fear mantra that was created by someone who is so attached to the notion that the O's must retain every prospect in order to fulfill some kind of fan fantasy of having an "all homegrown team". Rubenstein should and MUST offer the necessary support to Elias in order to sustain winning. When I hear "hands off" I hear uninterested and uninvolved which is not what I have observed from Rubenstein who has been at EVERY SINGLE GAME that I have attended this year. "Hands off" to me seems to be the opposite of Rubenstein and not desirable at all. IMO great orgs/companies/teams need great leadership from the top. Also, there can realistically be no repeat of the Duquette years. That org/administration never had a firm foundation and the success was always built on a house of cards. It always felt we arrived at competitive/good by accident. Lastly, I have NEVER EVER said anything close to "prospects be damned". But I don't it will serve us will to be dogmatic about any singular approach. True genius is in the ability to adapt. We will have a limited ceiling like (Tampa Bay Rays/Guardians) if we are going to limit ourselves to being a prospect only/homegrown team.
    • I don’t think they pay him 22M.  2/35-3/48 type deal. Leas AAV for more years.
    • He really seems like good trade bait. Enough talent to get a veteran reliever, not enough talent that we need to keep him.   
    • I would be shocked if Elias traded Basallo, Mayo, or Holliday.   I don’t think it’s happening.  I’m tempted to say zero chance of that happening.
    • I mean, yeah, in theory. But if you don't think he's subtly or not-so-subtly steering his clients towards free agency with years of material/arguments that make it seem like the smartest idea (and he would know, look at his track record, etc), then that's pretty naive.  Like, yeah, if his client is adamant about something, sure. But if they're on the fence, he's a master manipulator. 
    • I dont think it matters in the playoffs. You need a little bit of luck in a 5 or a 3 game series.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...