Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What do you put the odds of Povich having the career Cease has had?

I think it's pretty long.

Thats why he’s being proposed as the third piece of the trade, not the feature piece.  But his ceiling is pretty good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Not sure if this has been mentioned in the 200 pages of Dylan Cease chat, but this was MLB Network's proposed Cease trade yesterday:

 

Baltimore gets: Cease

 

Chicago gets: Kjerstad, Ortiz, Armbruester

That’s one I might reluctantly do.  Armbruester might have a higher floor than Povich, but I think his ceiling is much lower.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Thats why he’s being proposed as the third piece of the trade, not the feature piece.  But his ceiling is pretty good.  

Right, but I was talking to someone who didn't want to give six years of Povich for only two years of Cease.

I think you are overrating Povich if you are planning on getting six years out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

 

I don't really agree with Rosenthal here. I see a pretty even balance of supply and demand for SP this offseason. A lot of the demand for SP has been satisfied (Yamamoto, ERod, Gray, Sale... apparently). Meanwhile there remains Snell, Imanaga, Montgomery, and even Stroman out there on the FA market in addition to potential trades for Cease, Bieber, Burnes, Luzardo (and other Marlins), etc.

Known buyers at the moment include BAL, NYY, BOS, SF, CHC, NYM (maybe after getting Manaea) CIN (maybe?), LAA (maybe?).

To me that sounds like a pretty even balance of supply/demand. But I guess we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s one I might reluctantly do.  Armbruester might have a higher floor than Povich, but I think his ceiling is much lower.  

Yeah, I feel the same way.

Tough call, but I'd like the O's to take a legitimate crack at winning it all in the Mullins/Santander/Means/Hays era. The price for pitchers is high, but I think this deal makes them (more) legitimate World Series contenders in 2024 and 2025.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Not sure if this has been mentioned in the 200 pages of Dylan Cease chat, but this was MLB Network's proposed Cease trade yesterday:

 

Baltimore gets: Cease

 

Chicago gets: Kjerstad, Ortiz, Armbruester

Yes, if somewhat reluctantly, but starting pitching is expensive and this would be a real-world trade offer.  And if Cease is the last one standing out of Valdez, Luzardo and Cease I would certainly make the deal. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Cease was in the majors at 23.

Povich's walk numbers increased last season.

You might want to cut down on the Flavoraid.

And your point is? I'm sure at 23 there was a much  greater expectation that Cease might be able to improve his walk rate than there is for him now at 28.  You might not believe in Povich, but it seems a bit ridiculous to say that there isn't a wider variable of outcomes for him based on his age, the lack of MLB data have for him, etc. I'm also not sure why you continue to try and compare a 23 year old pitcher with no MLB experience to a 28 year old veteran pitcher with five years of MLB experience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I respect that, but I think the deal that would get it done is Westburg, Cowser/Kjerstad, and McDermott/Povich. They could kick in Kopech but that would be really complicated. 

It may get it done but it’s more value than what we should be trading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

And your point is? I'm sure at 23 there was a much  greater expectation that Cease might be able to improve his walk rate than there is for him now at 28.  You might not believe in Povich, but it seems a bit ridiculous to say that there isn't a wider variable of outcomes for him based on his age, the lack of MLB data have for him, etc. I'm also not sure why you continue to try and compare a 23 year old pitcher with no MLB experience to a 28 year old veteran pitcher with five years of MLB experience. 

Because you are worried that the lack of a 23 year old minor league with command issues will be too much to overcome after Cease leaves in two years.

I just find it amusing that you latch on to both Cease's walk rate and a pitching prospect with a similar flaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because you are worried that the lack of a 23 year old minor league with command issues will be too much to overcome after Cease leaves in two years.

I just find it amusing that you latch on to both Cease's walk rate and a pitching prospect with a similar flaw.

I'm not latching onto anything. You're the one who keeps trying to compare apples to oranges. Not wanting to trade Povich has more to do with prospects being a bit of a numbers game, since they all don't work out, and recognizing that the odds are already stacked against us in the pitching department because of our lack of depth.  The reality is that we need some of these pitchers to hit.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because you are worried that the lack of a 23 year old minor league with command issues will be too much to overcome after Cease leaves in two years.

I just find it amusing that you latch on to both Cease's walk rate and a pitching prospect with a similar flaw.

It’s interesting comparing the two.  They are quite similar (stat profile).  Cease logged 354ip in minors 4.2 bb/9 11.4k/9.  Cease came out of HS while Povich went to college and they both made it to AAA at same ages. In 250ip Povich is 3.8bb/9 12.1 k/9.  I’ll put my money long term on the 6’3” lefty who has a full arsenal and doesn’t rely on one pitch for success.  Cease gave up slightly fewer h/9  &  .7 fewer hr/9 (Fairly significant and Povich’s big weak spot).  WHIPs almost identical.  

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cease is an Oriole then either Kjerstad, Mayo, or Basallo is a White Sox, and yes I know how this entire board thinks Basallo and Mayo are destined for the HOF already, imagine how Getz feels about those two? I think in the end a deal gets done but it’s gonna hurt a little bit 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...