Jump to content

What are your expectations for John Means in 2024?


Frobby

What are your expectations for John Means in 2024?  

62 members have voted

  1. 1. What are your expectations for John Means in 2024?

    • Under 100 innings, ERA over 4.30
    • Under 100 innings, ERA 3.70-4.30
    • Under 100 innings, ERA under 3.70
    • 100-130 innings, ERA over 4.30
    • 100-130 innings, ERA 3.70-4.30
    • Over 130 innings, ERA 3.70-4.30
    • Over 130 innings, ERA under 3.70

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/31/24 at 20:04

Recommended Posts

I’m curious what people expect from John Means, both in terms of innings and ERA.   I’ve given nine scenarios in the poll that combine different innings and ERA ranges.  Take your shot, and if you want to make a more specific projection, feel free to post it here.

For his career, Means has a 3.74 ERA, 4.63 FIP, 4.90 xFiP, 3.97 xERA.  In his brief 2023 comeback, in 23.2 innings he had a 2.66 ERA, 5.24 FIP, 5.91 xFIP, 4.73 xERA.   

ZiPS’ median projection has Means throwing 85 innings to a 4.24 ERA.  His 80th percentile projected ERA is 3.78, 20th percentile is 4.83.  Overall, that feels pretty pessimistic on both the IP and ERA front.  

Steamer projects Means at 135 innings, 4.42 ERA.   I’m actually not sure if the IP projection comes from Steamer, or from the Fangraphs staff.

Marcel projects Means at 72 innings, 4.00 ERA.

What’s your guess?

Edit:

By the way, my poll got screwed up somehow, as I had written out 9 options but only 7 are showing.  Missing are:

100-130 innings, ERA under 3.70 

Over 130 innings, ERA over 4.30

i know for sure I typed all 9 of them. Oh well.  If you would have chosen one of those, just say so here.  

 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

150ish innings high 3 ERA.

Basically, he's the pitcher he was before the surgery.  That's probably optimistic, but the record of recovery from TJ surgery nowadays is pretty high, and we saw him last year looking pretty solid.

I do worry about the aggravation that caused him to miss the playoffs; I would feel stronger about my prediction with some clarity on that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see how anyone can have any expectation that is overly positive. That’s just hopes and wishes and not reality.

110ish innings of 4.5 ERA would be my hope…anything more/better than that is gravy. 
 

He isn’t a power arm, so hopefully this surgery doesn’t affect him too much but he got better when he added a little velo. Will that still be there?  Will the command and control still be there?  Will he stay healthy and pitch enough? He had durability  concerns before the TJ surgery happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pickles said:

150ish innings high 3 ERA.

Basically, he's the pitcher he was before the surgery.  That's probably optimistic, but the record of recovery from TJ surgery nowadays is pretty high, and we saw him last year looking pretty solid.

I do worry about the aggravation that caused him to miss the playoffs; I would feel stronger about my prediction with some clarity on that situation.

I 2nd this.   John has never pitched with a defense like the O's have now.  Or a bullpen.   Or an offense.   He is going to win a lot of games.  I expect him to miss 6 weeks with a tired shoulder but he will come back to finish the season and the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I 2nd this.   John has never pitched with a defense like the O's have now.  Or a bullpen.   Or an offense.   He is going to win a lot of games.  I expect him to miss 6 weeks with a tired shoulder but he will come back to finish the season and the playoffs.

image.jpeg.2f8cb604e70424751f410e1a905b9442.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I 2nd this.   John has never pitched with a defense like the O's have now.  Or a bullpen.   Or an offense.   He is going to win a lot of games.  I expect him to miss 6 weeks with a tired shoulder but he will come back to finish the season and the playoffs.

I would have bet my bottom dollar that you’d choose the most optimistic category here, and I hope you’re right.   One factor you didn’t mention is that Means has barely pitched at OPACY since the LF wall was moved back.  As a fly ball LHP, he probably benefits the most of anyone currently on our staff from the new configuration.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm usually fairly optimistic.  But I'm still concerned about Means.  A lot of Savant metrics looks like 2021 data though.  Even with some SSS improvements.  But the Babip, low K%, and high LOB% are concerning.   I tend to think 4.30+ ERA.  If there was an over 130 IP and over 4.30 ERA option, I would have chosen that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, my poll got screwed up somehow, as I had written out 9 options but only 7 are showing.  Missing are:

100-130 innings, ERA under 3.70 

Over 130 innings, ERA over 4.30

i know for sure I typed all 9 of them. Oh well.  If you would have chosen one of those, just say so here.  I’ll edit the OP too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • What about the Rays? I know it’s hard to trade in division. They need offense and you could kill 2 birds with one stone. Zach Efflin and Jason Adam would solve both starter and bullpen issues. Rays may be extra incentivized to get rid of Efflin contract.
    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...