Jump to content

What Service Time Manipulation Gives Us


Gofannon

Recommended Posts

Trying to tame my frustration.  It makes sense short term and long term for the team as long as the opening day team can hold their own the first half and the better replacements come in at the second half. I don’t like it, but I guess I get it. I should just be glad that players like Westburg or Cowser are not even really thought about much because they have players like Rutschman, Henderson, Holliday, Basillo and Mayo. Not that long ago we would be drooling over the potential of Westburg and Cowser who may very well be serviceable good players for years to come. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

I thought it’s more than 15 games now. I remember Rutchman coming up end of May just to be safe. I imagine they gave them the defensive talk and we will see them soon.

Rutschman was injured during spring training and had to work his way back into shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the optics of it, all for an extra year in 2030. I also think you should show good will to your future stars, it may pay off in the future. I know it's a business, and they know it's a business. But there's good will in business, too. It too makes business sense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, sevastras said:

Trying to tame my frustration.  It makes sense short term and long term for the team as long as the opening day team can hold their own the first half and the better replacements come in at the second half. I don’t like it, but I guess I get it. I should just be glad that players like Westburg or Cowser are not even really thought about much because they have players like Rutschman, Henderson, Holliday, Basillo and Mayo. Not that long ago we would be drooling over the potential of Westburg and Cowser who may very well be serviceable good players for years to come. 

This! I feel the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, sevastras said:

Trying to tame my frustration.  It makes sense short term and long term for the team as long as the opening day team can hold their own the first half and the better replacements come in at the second half. I don’t like it, but I guess I get it. I should just be glad that players like Westburg or Cowser are not even really thought about much because they have players like Rutschman, Henderson, Holliday, Basillo and Mayo. Not that long ago we would be drooling over the potential of Westburg and Cowser who may very well be serviceable good players for years to come. 

To think that you just named 7 top position players and didn't even mention Kjerstad, a former top 2 pick who had a great year in the minors last year.  Five years ago his picture would be all over the O's website and we'd be screaming for him.  And Stowers.  And Norby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, do I understand that the Orioles actually don’t want Holliday, or any Oriole, to win ROY? Or come in second?
Instead of incentivizing bringing a player up, it actually handicaps his chances of being promoted when he should be?

 If that’s the case, I am perplexed.

Our goal is to win a World Series, and not control a player for an extra flipping year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Philip said:

So, do I understand that the Orioles actually don’t want Holliday, or any Oriole, to win ROY? Or come in second?
Instead of incentivizing bringing a player up, it actually handicaps his chances of being promoted when he should be?

 If that’s the case, I am perplexed.

Our goal is to win a World Series, and not control a player for an extra flipping year. 

Our goal as fans is to win the World Series.

That might not be the primary goal of the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Our goal as fans is to win the World Series.

That might not be the primary goal of the organization.

My opinion is, Elias does not believe that having Holliday on the team at the beginning of this season is likely to lead to more wins than if he isn’t on the team.  Simple as that.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

My opinion is, Elias does not believe that having Holliday on the team at the beginning of this season is likely to lead to more wins than if he isn’t on the team.  Simple as that.   

I think having the best team this year isn’t his primary goal. This team, even without Holliday, is terrific, especially compared to the damaged teams in the East.

Based on what he’s done( except for inexplicable moves like Jesus Aguilar, Brett Phillips and Frazier) he seems to want to average the quality over as many years as possible, hence his unwillingness to maximize this years team at the expense of future teams.

He thinks the team as is will win the East( which, given the vagaries of the tournament, is the main goal)even without a full season of Mayo/Holliday/ Stowers/Etc and the 2030 team will be better for their presence.
And he doesn’t give a flip about awards that increase the price of players.

That would also explain why Elias won’t trade an asset for less than perceived max value. He’s happy to keep them for future use if he doesn’t get full price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, waroriole said:

It makes sense to get the extra year. It doesn’t make sense to proclaim Holliday has a chance to make the team, unprompted, and then send him to Norfolk after he has a great spring. Just an unforced error. 

I don’t get why so many are making such a big deal about this. It’s completely meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Philip said:

 

Our goal is to win a World Series, and not control a player for an extra flipping year. 

Lucky for us, the World Series is played in October, not April or early May.  Holliday will arguably be on the team by then and have enough at bats at the major league level to make a difference if he's as good as we hope.  That Carter guy for the Rangers had very few ML at bats, and he raked in the post season.  But I can see it now, if we bring Holliday up in May or early June, and he doesn't perform in the postseason (assuming we get there), many on here will think it's because we held him back.  And in reality, that just won't be true.

And, if we don't make it to the post season, many will believe it was because Jackson Holliday wasn't on the opening day roster.

Book it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Jeremy Lee is pitching in high-A for the Twins, he's an alum of that school. I'm not sure how many I'd expect from a town with a population of 17,000 people.
    • Yeah I mean, the pitching matchups are about as bad as they could get by random chance. It is what it is. I'm not expecting much from this series. If we lose the series, it won't say a ton about either the Orioles or the Yankees.  BUT - if we win the series, it will be huge. And the Yankees' claim at best in the AL will look highly suspect. 
    • Why 2025+ is important in any trade discussions ... just with regards to position players:  There is a chance the Orioles will have two openings in the outfield beginning next season.  Any or all of Santander, Mullins, and Hays could be gone after the season.  If that happened, it would leave Cowser as the only high-probability starter.  Odds are Cowser would be our CF, but regardless, we'd need to fill those two other spots.  Replacement candidates for COF's, IMHO, are Kjerstad, Norby, and Stowers.  In that group it would seem that only Stowers can play solid defensively in the outfield.  FWIW I don't believe Beavers or Fabian or Cook would be strongly considered to start, nor do I expect Elias to ask Holliday to get reps in CF or Mayo in RF (even though both have merit).  Ryan O'Hearn can play a decent-at-best RF but should not be counted on to start there.   So, if we deal away any of Kjerstad, Norby or Stowers, we'd weaken our options beyond this season.  Again, this assumes we would not attempt to resign/extend Santander (big assumption) or bring back Mullins and Hays with the intention of them starting. As well, beginning next season we may find ourselves in an interesting situation within the infield.  With Mountcastle at 1B, Gunnar at SS and Westburg at either 3B or 2B, there would only be room for either Holliday or Mayo to start regularly.  One possible solution is trading Mountcastle this off-season.  That would allow Mayo to take over at 1B, assuming the O's would be comfortable with his defense at 1B.  Another less likely way to resolve the matter is having Mayo getting a crash course this winter in playing RF OR having Holliday do the same in CF.  Again, not anticipating either. Naturally, there is always the possibility of trading for an outfielder or signing one.   My point is that there is much to consider in weighing this season versus future seasons.  Watching it all unfold fascinating.  
    • IMO the Padres are the team who can least afford to give away any more future assets they are running a bit thin. And some of their higher priced players are starting to age. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over while continuously getting the same (undesirable) results. If Elias values Crochet the way that you appear to, then maybe he is worth strongly considering acquiring? I can't see them moving Holliday. But again there are scenarios in which one of Mayo/Basallo are expendable long term (even if one or both turn into all-star level players).
    • Like I said, I didn't know he was sick, I don't pay attention to the Padres at all and it's never been front page of any site that I frequent. If the prognosis is years that paints a different picture.
    • I would wait and see who is left standing out of HOU, TEX, CIN, and PIT. Bednar might be my top target if he keeps pitching well or the 15 K/9 guy from CIN. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...