Jump to content

Orioles attendance 2024


Recommended Posts

After 40 home dates, Orioles attendance stands at 1,096,047.   That compares to 809,511 last year, an increase of 35.4%.  If the O’s kept that up all season, attendance would finish at 2.622 mm.  I have my doubts it will finish that high, only because second half attendance was extremely strong last year so I don’t think the 35.4% increase will be sustained.   Still, I’d say there’s a good shot of exceeding 2.5 mm, which would be a really nice jump.   

Attendance for the last 10 games was 332,031, which is the strongest 10 game stretch since 2019 when I started keeping track.
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2024 at 8:49 PM, Frobby said:

After 40 home dates, Orioles attendance stands at 1,096,047.   That compares to 809,511 last year, an increase of 35.4%.  If the O’s kept that up all season, attendance would finish at 2.622 mm.  I have my doubts it will finish that high, only because second half attendance was extremely strong last year so I don’t think the 35.4% increase will be sustained.   Still, I’d say there’s a good shot of exceeding 2.5 mm, which would be a really nice jump.   

Attendance for the last 10 games was 332,031, which is the strongest 10 game stretch since 2019 when I started keeping track.
 

Let’s hope that all adds up to encouraging DR to SPEND 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After 50 home dates, the Orioles' attendance is at 1,370,764.    That's a 27.9% increase over last year at the 50-game mark.  If the increase continued at that pace, attendance would be in the ballpark of 2.478 mm.   However, I think it will be just about impossible to increase the attendance for the last 31 games by 27.9%, because attendance over the last 31 games last year was quite high (27,914 per game, compared to 21,430 in the first 50 games).   The O's would have to average 35,702 the rest of the year to sustain the current 27.9% increase, and that's not going to happen.   I think a reasonable goal would be a 10% increase over the remainder of the year, which would edge them over 2.3 mm for the year.   That would be their highest attendance since 2014 (2.464 mm), but not quite to that level.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

After 50 home dates, the Orioles' attendance is at 1,370,764.    That's a 27.9% increase over last year at the 50-game mark.  If the increase continued at that pace, attendance would be in the ballpark of 2.478 mm.   However, I think it will be just about impossible to increase the attendance for the last 31 games by 27.9%, because attendance over the last 31 games last year was quite high (27,914 per game, compared to 21,430 in the first 50 games).   The O's would have to average 35,702 the rest of the year to sustain the current 27.9% increase, and that's not going to happen.   I think a reasonable goal would be a 10% increase over the remainder of the year, which would edge them over 2.3 mm for the year.   That would be their highest attendance since 2014 (2.464 mm), but not quite to that level.

Agree with all of this. They would have to go on one hell of a heater post all star break, plus some wow additions at the deadline. This trace to the expense of being so consistently bad for so long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/13/2024 at 8:58 AM, Frobby said:

After 50 home dates, the Orioles' attendance is at 1,370,764.    That's a 27.9% increase over last year at the 50-game mark.  If the increase continued at that pace, attendance would be in the ballpark of 2.478 mm.   However, I think it will be just about impossible to increase the attendance for the last 31 games by 27.9%, because attendance over the last 31 games last year was quite high (27,914 per game, compared to 21,430 in the first 50 games).   The O's would have to average 35,702 the rest of the year to sustain the current 27.9% increase, and that's not going to happen.   I think a reasonable goal would be a 10% increase over the remainder of the year, which would edge them over 2.3 mm for the year.   That would be their highest attendance since 2014 (2.464 mm), but not quite to that level.

Frobby,  thanks for sharing positive attendance news . I do have a question . Is this current heat wave keeping some fans away from games ?  Just curious .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Good to see that the Nats attendance is up as well.  If these numbers have any correlation to MASN viewership, it would seem to increase short term revenue via advertising contracts and long term return to the new ownership group as they look to sell or merge with Monumental.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Nice attendance for the Padres this weekend, a little over 112 k.  Today’s gonna hurt, a single admission doubleheader caused by the earlier rainout.  Not many people in the ballpark right now for the opener. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Nice attendance for the Padres this weekend, a little over 112 k.  Today’s gonna hurt, a single admission doubleheader caused by the earlier rainout.  Not many people in the ballpark right now for the opener. 

I get the feeling you can't wait until the deadline is over to talk about anything else lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

After 60 home dates, the O’s have drawn 1,663,502.  That’s a 20.4% increase over the 60-game mark last year, down from a 27.9% increase at the 50-game mark.  In fact, the Orioles drew a little less in games 51-60 this year (293 k) than they did last year (310 k).   That’s partially because the O’s recently had a single-admission doubleheader with the Blue Jays caused by an earlier rain out.   The next 10-game segment figures to be a strong one, with a weeknight game with the Nats, two Thurs.-Sun. four game series with the Red Sox and Astros, and a Labor Day game with the White Sox.  Hopefully the O’s will wake up and play well for the big crowds.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • You always need shuttle guys. Ideally, I would think they’d like to have 2-3 spots they can interchange between 5-6 guys. That allows them to maybe get some younger arms in there, like McDermott and the others we mentioned already.  Bautista, if he is back to his old form, Seranthony, Cano, Soto (who I think may just surprise some people), while Cionel and Akin are not sure things. Either could be moved. They should make some moves there, IMO. Cionel has not really improved as much as I had hoped. Akin has had a very good year. Are they ARB eligible this year?
    • You’re the one who threw Ripken into the discussion.  And I don’t think anyone is necessarily saying that Gunnar will be as good as Ripken.  Cal is 3rd all time in Total Zone Runs for a SS.  But, Cal also proves that you don’t judge a SS solely on how many errors they make.  The years that Cal made 26, 25 and 25 errors, he was +11, +23, +O Rtot.  And  Gunnar is playing a solid SS now by the advanced metrics.  
    • Coby's problem is not the SSS at bats, but rather his sample size on defense, both minors and majors. He has no position at this point in his career. He's a DH and not in the lineup today because AS is Dhing. Eloy is on the bench as well. Both are PH options so stay ready. 
    • I do not know if there were extenuating circumstances or not.  Could be it's a quieter locker room without the rest of the guys, which would make sense in a concussion situation.  So, maybe I did rush to an unfair conclusion here.  At the time, I felt like it more of a "spring training look" when the starters all leave the field after they're done playing.....so yes, there could be other very reasonable explanations. I'll stand corrected, and retract my conclusion.
    • Message to Coby.....you better learn how to use a glove.
    • Totally agree.  And at no point will some people be able to admit that the shiny, new rookie may be overmatched, and putting him just because hangouters want him in there may not be the best move for team chemistry or results  People need to earn their way when given a chance, and with where we are in the standings, leashes are going to be short.  We're not the White Sox who can afford to play anyone they want because it doesn't matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...