Jump to content

Ramon Urias 2024


DirtyBird

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

Oh, like Adam Frazier.....

Frazier had been a good defender before last year.  Last year his defense cratered and they got Westburg up here and gave a lot of 2B time to Westburg.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

The defensive stats on Frazier varied.  I felt his range was below average, but he made all the plays he got to, and turned a nice double play.

I'm not sure it's fair to say he was below average, nor is it fair to say they ran him out there everyday, particularly in the 2nd half.

He played in 141 games, or like 87% of the games played.  That's about as close to everyday as you can get.  For our infielders, only Henderson had more games played than Frazier.

His defense was poor, though there may be defense stats that said otherwise.  As noted in an article about Frazier possibly returning to the club this year -

Frazier’s defense, which according to FanGraphs was, well, dreadful. His -15 Outs Above Average at second base was easily the worst of any O’s fielder at any position. His -4 Defensive Runs Saved was second-worst only to Aaron Hicks in center field (-5). And Baseball Savant puts Frazier in the first percentile for range — meaning 99% of fielders have more range than him. It’s not pretty.

We can argue which defense numbers to use, but numbers THIS bad certainly calls into question just how much they REALLY valued defense IMO.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Frazier had been a good defender before last year.  Last year his defense cratered and they got Westburg up here and gave a lot of 2B time to Westburg.

While still playing Frazier in 141 games.  As you stated, his defense cratered, yet he STILL got into 141 games.  Sure sounds like defense is their #1 priority, no?  🙂  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, forphase1 said:

He played in 141 games, or like 87% of the games played.  That's about as close to everyday as you can get.  For our infielders, only Henderson had more games played than Frazier.

His defense was poor, though there may be defense stats that said otherwise.  As noted in an article about Frazier possibly returning to the club this year -

Frazier’s defense, which according to FanGraphs was, well, dreadful. His -15 Outs Above Average at second base was easily the worst of any O’s fielder at any position. His -4 Defensive Runs Saved was second-worst only to Aaron Hicks in center field (-5). And Baseball Savant puts Frazier in the first percentile for range — meaning 99% of fielders have more range than him. It’s not pretty.

We can argue which defense numbers to use, but numbers THIS bad certainly calls into question just how much they REALLY valued defense IMO.

He started 100 games at 2b, and less as the year went on.  He was not an every 2b in the second of the season by any stretch.

FG has his defense as terrible; BRef has his defense as above average.  I know many prefer FG, and I'm not going down that road, but his defense was not universally panned by the statistics.

Now, I will say I believe they thought/hoped he'd be better defensively when they signed him.  And that he had regressed out there.

He also didn't start a game in the playoffs, so by the time the team was fully formed, he was not the starting 2b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

While still playing Frazier in 141 games.  As you stated, his defense cratered, yet he STILL got into 141 games.  Sure sounds like defense is their #1 priority, no?  🙂  

That 141 is extremely misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Frazier’s defense was below average last year, but had not been historically.   The O’s did cut his playing time as the year progressed.  He started 59 of 76 games at 2B before Westburg arrived (78%), and 48 of 86 afterwards (56%).   

What I’ve been seeing and reading about Holliday so far is not only some physical miscues, but also some mental errors (i.e., being slow to cover the bag on a few occasions).  That’s the type of thing you wouldn’t see with Frazier.  And you won’t see it with Holliday either, once he’s had enough reps to have a good feel for the position.   He just needs some time to get used to knowing where to be on certain plays, work on timing and angles at game speed, etc.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

But accurate...

No it's not.

It's a "statistic" the obsures the truth.

He started 100 games at 2b, and less as the season wore on, and none in the playoffs.

He was not an everyday 2b for the Orioles.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

While still playing Frazier in 141 games.  As you stated, his defense cratered, yet he STILL got into 141 games.  Sure sounds like defense is their #1 priority, no?  🙂  

Nice try.  He started 106 games at 2B.  I would guess the frequency of his starts decreased as the year went on.  They started the season committed to Frazier who, since 2018 had both strong DRS and OAA numbers.  He didn’t come as advertised.   They greatly reduced his time at 2B in the 2nd half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pickles said:

No it's not.

It's a "statistic" the obsures the truth.

He started 100 games at 2b, and less as the season wore on, and none in the playoffs.

He was not an everyday 2b for the Orioles.

Sure he was.  Even you admit he started 100 games at 2nd.  Even that has him starting a majority of the games in 2023, roughly 62%, making him the 'everyday' 2b for the Orioles.  Now he certainly started less as the year went on, but as @Frobbynoted he STILL started 58% of them even after Westburg was called up.  

Point is simply that the use of Frazier as much as they did (whether you want to use the 141 games he played in or the 100 he started, whatever) goes against just how important defense is to the Os management.  They talk about it a great deal, but I'm not sure it's REALLY as heavily weighed as we think.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Nice try.  He started 106 games at 2B.  I would guess the frequency of his starts decreased as the year went on.  They started the season committed to Frazier who, since 2018 had both strong DRS and OAA numbers.  He didn’t come as advertised.   They greatly reduced his time at 2B in the 2nd half.

Sure, they started using him less, but STILL started him 58% of the time AFTER Westburg was called up.  Now I don't disagree that he didn't come as advertised.  I expected his defense to be better and his offense to be worse, though offensively he wasn't good, but did have some very timely hits.  But even with his defense having cratered, he still started 106 out of 162 games, by your numbers.  Much more than I'd expected from a team that SO highly values defense.  🙂  

Anyway, I think we've exhausted this topic.  Maybe they can post a lineup for the game tonight that we can argue about instead.  😉  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, forphase1 said:

Sure, they started using him less, but STILL started him 58% of the time AFTER Westburg was called up.  Now I don't disagree that he didn't come as advertised.  I expected his defense to be better and his offense to be worse, though offensively he wasn't good, but did have some very timely hits.  But even with his defense having cratered, he still started 106 out of 162 games, by your numbers.  Much more than I'd expected from a team that SO highly values defense.  🙂  

Anyway, I think we've exhausted this topic.  Maybe they can post a lineup for the game tonight that we can argue about instead.  😉  

They aren’t my numbers.  You can find them in baseball reference.   Your number of 141, as Pickles said, was very misleading.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, EdwinRip said:

Mateo has looked shakey at 2nd along with O’Hearn in the outfield.  I don’t see this team valuing defense. I see them valuing veterans.

O’Hearn should never play the outfield again given the options the Orioles have at the outfield position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One way or another, Urias is likely to be on this team for a while, so it would be nice if he started playing better.  He did get a hit that started a rally today, but he also made a poor play dropping the ball after the tag of O'Neil Cruz at 3B.   After one of the HR's today (I think Gunnar's?), the camera panned into the dugout for the congratulations line.  Ramon looked like he wanted to crawl into a hole.  He must be under awful pressure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...