Jump to content

Who Should Be Extension Priority #1?


Who Should Be Extension Priority #1?  

125 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Should Be Extension Priority #1?



Recommended Posts

It probably makes the most financial sense to extend Gunnar first and probably sooner rather than later.

If he continues in this trajectory he may be headed for the MVP. If that happens then you probably don’t have much chance to extend unless it’s for a 300- 500 million type deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Mullins might be the most likely to extended first. CF is about as thin as C is across baseball. EBJ is also struggling a bit in Aberdeen. 

Mullins is somehow a bit underrated it feels. Crazy to think that our GG is underrated. 

It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum.

2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111    
2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111    
2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111    
2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111    
2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111    
2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111    
2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option
2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option
2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option
2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option
2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option
2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option
2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

The Orioles are not going to re-sign Burnes and they prob shouldn't based on what he's going to ask for.

Answer is Gunnar and it's not even really close.  Give the man whatever he wants and keep him indefinitely.  

You would give him a Tatis deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would give him a deal based on what Seattle did. Large incentives for GG, MVP, All Star etc. and I’d try to avoid opt outs. (Although Julio Rodriguez’ did have them).
 

That deal was 12 years 209M and could extend to almost 500M with 2 MVPs. 
 

And I’d tell Gunnar that these were the types of deals that would allow extensions to his teammates. 

Edited by foxfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You would give him a Tatis deal?

I generally don't like deals that long.  Maybe if there were opt outs. There was maybe some hyperbole in what I said because obv you don't just give him a blank check.  But the Witt deal I think is def in the realm which isn't that far off from Tatis.  Just don't know if I want to be guaranteed to commit into his mid 30's.  But it may take that to get him to sign on the dotted line.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

I generally don't like deals that long.  Maybe if there were opt outs. There was maybe some hyperbole in what I said because obv you don't just give him a blank check.  But the Witt deal I think is def in the realm which isn't that far off from Tatis.  Just don't know if I want to be guaranteed to commit into his mid 30's.  But it may take that to get him to sign on the dotted line.  

It’s either the Witt deal or the Tatis deal.  
 

No way he’s turning down a similar deal (probably add 10% or so) to what Witt got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s either the Witt deal or the Tatis deal.  
 

No way he’s turning down a similar deal (probably add 10% or so) to what Witt got.

Yup.  I'd have to strongly consider that.  There will most likely be drop off in product in the last 3-4 years but you hope the other 10 were as incredible as it's looking like it could be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Yup.  I'd have to strongly consider that.  There will most likely be drop off in product in the last 3-4 years but you hope the other 10 were as incredible as it's looking like it could be. 

I wouldn’t hesitate to give him the Witt deal. I would like to get 3 FA years.  That’s my best case scenario and after that, the opt outs start.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...