Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

The 2020-2024 Chicago White Sox should be a cautionary tale for all of us.  A little bad luck and a few bad decisions is all it takes.

Thank you for sharing your perspective.

However a disagree totally and completely. It’s going to take WAY MORE than “a little bad luck” and “a few bad decisions”.

IMO it would take the worse luck ever and horrible decisions in the form of almost self-sabotage in order for us not to be competitive in the next 3 years at least. We have dynasty type assets. With smart decisions from baseball ops, meaningful financial backing from ownership, and a little good fortune, we could be the next Houston Astros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

So with a team that has Gunnar Henderson at age 22 (getting ready to turn 23), Adley Rutshman at 26, Jordan Westburg at 25, Colton Cowser at 24, Grayson Rodriguez at 24 (will be 25 later this season after the season), Ryan Mountcastle at 27, plus all of the talent at AAA; you think this team can crash and burn after this year? 

Were you just talking in hypotheticals? Or were you being serious in application to what the Orioles have right now?

I would challenge ANYONE to cite how one or two realistic trades can have next season or the season after that or even the one after that be 2018 or even 2017.

IMO we have at least 3 more World Series shots regardless of what we do at the deadline. And if we do a few extensions to players like Adley and Gunnar, we will have several more shots after that!

I struggle to see how that "window" talk or even comparisons to 2017/2018 are relevant to this situation (except that it is the same org and they wear pretty much the same uniforms except for the City Connect shirts).

No , this year’s Orioles will NOT crash and burn . I was using the 2018 Orioles as a reference, which they DID crash and burn.  The window for Orioles as a World Series contender opened last season. How long will it stay open ?   It depends on how Elias’s trades , FA , draft & international decisions work out . The better Elias does , the longer Orioles window stays open 

Edited by Allan Bryant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Philip said:

Yes, I really don’t have a problem with the Flaherty trade. The cost was minimal.

I think that now, we need something a little bit more reliable.

The positive impact of Flaherty was even less than minimal. ONE SINGULAR good start. 

It was a very low risk/low reward move that didn’t allow us to potentially maximize on the ultimate outcome of the 2023 season. 

Hopefully the same mistake is not made again for 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Allan Bryant said:

No , this year’s Orioles will NOT crash and burn . I was using the 2018 Orioles as a reference, which they DID crash and burn.  The window for Orioles as a World Series contender opened last season. How long will it stay open ?   It depends on how Elias’s trades , FA , draft & international decisions work out . The better Elias does , the longer Orioles stays open 

IMO, it’s going to take more than Elias. He will need what he never had under Angelos, meaningful ownership support to make additions using all the avenues of team improvement, not just some.

Also, we will need the tremendous efforts from players like Henderson and Rutschman AND a little good fortune in order to MAXIMIZE our true to potential and become multiple World Series winners with this cast of characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

I disagree about the Flaherty and Fujinama "acquisitions" (and I use that term VERY LOOSELY) last season. They both represented "unforced errors" and untimely hedging. Many (including myself) questioned the quality of the front part of our rotation beyond Bradish. It was hard to see that we had excellent depth in the starting rotation. But not the kind of quality up top to succeed through multiple rounds of the playoffs. Flaherty was literally one of the worse starting pitchers that was available. I understand that Elias was working on Cease. But you have to have a credible plan B. You can jump from plan A to plan F (break glass in case of emergency). Flaherty was so bad with us (IMO predictably) that he wasn't an option to start a postseason game and Fujinama wasn't even worth considering to appear on the roster. 

IMO those were hedging trades that were made trying to be as cheap as possible when the roster was already as lost costing as could be. I understand that spending is inevitably an ownership choice. So, hopefully without the stench of Scrooge McAngelos around this time, Elias won't have such limiting hinderances to deal with.

Scrooge McAngelos  ?  Good one !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone may have already mentioned this. Jim Bowden mentioned yesterday by name Kopech and Pham with CWS. 
 

With Oakland Adams and Erceg. Said he thinks Doval would be a good fit with SF if they fall out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Someone may have already mentioned this. Jim Bowden mentioned yesterday by name Kopech and Pham with CWS. 
 

With Oakland Adams and Erceg. Said he thinks Doval would be a good fit with SF if they fall out of it. 

Pham would be interesting since it would be in sharp contrast to the school of thought that Elias cares about character in his players.

 

Edited by Can_of_corn
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

IMO, it’s going to take more than Elias. He will need what he never had under Angelos, meaningful ownership support to make additions using all the avenues of team improvement, not just some.

Also, we will need the tremendous efforts from players like Henderson and Rutschman AND a little good fortune in order to MAXIMIZE our true to potential and become multiple World Series winners with this cast of characters.

A little good fortune to be multiple WS winners?   Man, you are setting yourself up for some serious disappointment.    Is it possible?  Sure.   No one has been as consistently stacked as the Dodgers and they got one.   And they spend!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pham would be interesting since it would be in sharp contrast to the school of thought that Elias cares about character in his players.

 

Where does Rougned Odor fall on the character scale? I honestly don't know, and I guess because it was Bautista, punching him in the face is A-Okay with O's fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pham would be interesting since it would be in sharp contrast to the school of thought that Elias cares about character in his players.

 

I agree. May just be smoke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

A little good fortune to be multiple WS winners?   Man, you are setting yourself up for some serious disappointment.    Is it possible?  Sure.   No one has been as consistently stacked as the Dodgers and they got one.   And they spend!

In the Covid year no less!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

A little good fortune to be multiple WS winners?   Man, you are setting yourself up for some serious disappointment.    Is it possible?  Sure.   No one has been as consistently stacked as the Dodgers and they got one.   And they spend!

It’s not like my bar is set where no other org has gone before.

I’m just saying afraid of big expectations. It’s how I live my life professionally and personally. It’s just how I’m wired. Maybe I will be disappointed but I believe in daring to dream big and going after greatness.

What drew me back to the O’s (after I became biter and uninterested due to the awfulness of the Angelos regime) was when I saw Elias being willing to undertake the task of an extreme tank. That was a sign to me that he has more in mind than mediocrity or just the possibility of competitiveness. But that he would try to chase greatness. And that was/is attractive to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

It’s not like my bar is set where no other org has gone before.

I’m just saying afraid of big expectations. It’s how I live my life professionally and personally. It’s just how I’m wired. Maybe I will be disappointed but I believe in daring to dream big and going after greatness.

What drew me back to the O’s (after I became biter and uninterested due to the awfulness of the Angelos regime) was when I saw Elias being willing to undertake the task of an extreme tank. That was a sign to me that he has more in mind than mediocrity or just the possibility of competitiveness. But that he would try to chase greatness. And that was/is attractive to me.

Well, he went for Jack Flaherty at the deadline last year.  When he doesn’t trade any of his top 3-4 prospects and doesn’t come up with the top 3-4 guys available at the deadline this year how strong will the love affair be then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Traded for Bradish, traded for Irvin, traded for Burnes, traded for Flaherty, list can go on.
    • Pablo Sandoval was pretty good for a five or six year stretch. Prince Fielder was a fat slob as was his dad. John Kruk was not  remotely athletic and had a good career. Surprisingly, Andruw Jones was not what I would consider an elite athlete but is probably the best defensive centerfielder of the last 30 years. No, being an elite athlete is not required to be a good baseball player. 
    • I wonder what your scouting report of Bobby Witt Jr was in 2022.
    • I think they are trying to tune the robo ump to more closely match the called MLB zone.  The AAA robo ump zone isn't 100% accurate to the rulebook zone, and while the called MLB zone isn't either, it's quite a bit closer.  Specifically balls fading out of the zone are more likely to be adjudged balls by the robo-ump because they're only checking pitch location on a plane at the midpoint of home plate, so for example, a curveball that clips the front of the zone, then drops below it when crossing the midpoint of home plate, would be called a ball by the current robo-ump, but is a strike by the rulebook.
    • Perhaps people shouldn't get personal with you, but you do bring it on yourself. You say outlandish things, presumably to troll, get called on them and then double, triple, quadruple, etc down until people take shots at you.
    • ??? The only sports where people peak younger than 20 is stuff like womens gymnastics and figure skating, where women have to delay puberty in order to maintain a body type ideal for the sport.  Nearly every other sport's athletes  peak between 22-27.
    • Ok several of you want to compare JH to Gunnar.  I am happy to do so: JH is 20 years old and has a .909 OPS at AAA after putting up a .941 OPS as a 19 year old at four levels. As a 20 year old Gunnar had a .826 OPS across three levels, .944 at A, .775 at A+ and .561 at AA (5 games) Even at 21 Gunnar went back to AA for almost half a season and his OPS at AA was .894 I am not saying JH will be as good as Gunnar but people saying we should trade for some pitcher we could have for a year or two have lost touch with common sense.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...