Jump to content

Irvin claimed by Twins


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

O's have a Irvin-like pitcher in Trevor Rogers.    But Rogers has options.

Rogers has the options and also a higher ceiling. 

But I gotta say, losing Irvin for nothing (2 more years of control, 4.86 ERA this year, 4.49 career), after trading what we did for Rogers (2 more years, 4.92 this year, 4.36 career) is not a good feeling. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Rogers has the options and also a higher ceiling. 

But I gotta say, losing Irvin for nothing (2 more years of control, 4.86 ERA this year, 4.49 career), after trading what we did for Rogers (2 more years, 4.92 this year, 4.36 career) is not a good feeling. 

Rogers “higher ceiling” feels like an additional half inch in the crawl space type of comparison. I’d have rather kept Stowers, Norby, and Irvin than have Rogers in the organization. 
 

To stay more on topic…I’d have liked to see Irvin kept around. Next year there is a crazy lack of depth for SP. Irvin would’ve been a good 6th SP/long man if he had a good spring.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now this is one move I think will come back to bite us. Either this year or beyond. Heck, the way this year has gone, it just seems fitting that Irwin will see us in the playoffs and the results will not be pleasant. Good guy - good teammate - good luck to him - but not in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Too Tall said:

Now this is one move I think will come back to bite us. Either this year or beyond. Heck, the way this year has gone, it just seems fitting that Irwin will see us in the playoffs and the results will not be pleasant. Good guy - good teammate - good luck to him - but not in the playoffs. 

I think he is ineligible for the Twins playoff roster since he was only added to the organization in September:

https://www.mlb.com/glossary/transactions/postseason-roster-rules-eligibility

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spy Fox said:

Rogers has the options and also a higher ceiling. 

But I gotta say, losing Irvin for nothing (2 more years of control, 4.86 ERA this year, 4.49 career), after trading what we did for Rogers (2 more years, 4.92 this year, 4.36 career) is not a good feeling. 

I kind of feel like he's an Arb2-Arb3 casualty.    The economic analysts are having the clubs bypass the built-in raises.

His class of player maybe experiences the Charile Finley "make them all free agents" unfavorable situation Marvin Miller avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

I understand keeping Kimbrel as a face-saving move. But why Smith? Is he a guy you want to use with anything on the line? Is there a belief he can be made over to help after this year?

I expect that Smith will go once Coulombe returns, which will hopefully be soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...