Jump to content

Trading Adam Jones


Scrat1

Recommended Posts

You give the deal to Jones because he's your Torii Hunter, the guy that is the core of the team.

Wieters is not that guy, Markakis is not that guy.

You can't just assume you'll find that guy in the trades you make, especially for the little talent we have to offer.

I think this is all moot though because Showalter loves Jones and the team has him as one of their faces so I doubt he's going anywhere.

Really? You think Jones is a piece to build around and Wieters is not? You think Jones is a more important piece than Wieters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So why would you want to pay him to be Torrii Hunter. Assuming he could even match Hunter's offense?

Hunter is a leader on and off the field. Jonesy is turning into him more and more each year IMO.

He's improved offensively each season and he's on pace to set career highs in AVG, 2Bs and RBI and he's only 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you can extend Jones for 5/60 with a mutal option for 15 million for a 6/75 possible contract.

Jonesy still likes it in Baltimore right now.

This should be enough ti damn him right there. No competitive player should like it in Baltimore right now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? You think Jones is a piece to build around and Wieters is not? You think Jones is a more important piece than Wieters?

I'm saying Wieters isn't a vocal leader in that clubhouse. He and Jones are part of the core, but Jones drives that team IMO.

They are both parts to build around. But you can't just build around Wieters.

The Yankees had Jeter, Williams, Posada

The Red Sox have Youkilis, Pedroia, Ortiz and Ellsbury

You need a solid core of offense that will be there for several seasons. Jones is still young enough to be part of a winning 2014 and beyond team, as is Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying Wieters isn't a vocal leader in that clubhouse. He and Jones are part of the core, but Jones drives that team IMO.

They are both parts to build around. But you can't just build around Wieters.

The Yankees had Jeter, Williams, Posada

The Red Sox have Youkilis, Pedroia, Ortiz and Ellsbury

You need a solid core of offense that will be there for several seasons. Jones is still young enough to be part of a winning 2014 and beyond team, as is Wieters.

I think if you extend Jones you end up with what BAL has in Markakis. Essentially a deal that is "worth it" but not one where they are saving money. And that is what they need to build around. Contracts where they are coming out ahead. That's the only way they will have enough flexibility to extend the pieces they need and bring in the FA gap fillers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter is a leader on and off the field. Jonesy is turning into him more and more each year IMO.

He's improved offensively each season and he's on pace to set career highs in AVG, 2Bs and RBI and he's only 25.

I don't buy the leadership stuff at all. Lots of guys can fill in the void to lead. Most/all of the stats you cited aren't important ones. I'll give you that he's progressed some and he may well develop into a prolific power hitter. I don't know. There's always risk there. Right now I have more concerns about his discipline / OBP skills and his defense and believe he's worth more in trade than investing more to see if he becomes Torri Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying Wieters isn't a vocal leader in that clubhouse. He and Jones are part of the core, but Jones drives that team IMO.

They are both parts to build around. But you can't just build around Wieters.

The Yankees had Jeter, Williams, Posada

The Red Sox have Youkilis, Pedroia, Ortiz and Ellsbury

You need a solid core of offense that will be there for several seasons. Jones is still young enough to be part of a winning 2014 and beyond team, as is Wieters.

How do you know this? Living in Maine how can you spend that much time in the O's clubhouse. Having the loudest mouth in the clubhouse (one that can be heard all the way to Maine, apparently)Doesn't necessarily make him a vocal leader.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Trea is neccassarily wrong about Jones.

There are a lot of reasons to like Adam and there are a lot of reasons to sign him long term.

The problem is, how much money are you willing to pay him and how much better do you think he is going to get from this point forward?

As i said the other day, I feel it is pretty safe to say that Jones' offense will be above average in CF...Most of the time, he will probably be in the 780-820 OPS range, which will be slugging% heavy and the OBP will be driven by his BA.

So, if you feel he is a 2-3 WAR player now, which is probably what he is, how much better do you think he will get...and really, for him to get better, it will likely have to come on the defensive side of things.

For him to become a 4+ WAR player, he will have to become a much better defensive player. Does he have the tools to do that? Yes, he probably does. Does he have the coachability, desire and effort to get better? That is what I am not sure about.

All I know is, right now, he isn't that player and the longer you wait to extend him, the more expensive it will be because you will be eating up more and more free agency years.

I just don't see the Jones extension being one that will be favorable to the Orioles and I really feel that there will be some team(s) that will offer a deal that will be too good to turn down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying Wieters isn't a vocal leader in that clubhouse. He and Jones are part of the core, but Jones drives that team IMO.

They are both parts to build around. But you can't just build around Wieters.

The Yankees had Jeter, Williams, Posada

The Red Sox have Youkilis, Pedroia, Ortiz and Ellsbury

You need a solid core of offense that will be there for several seasons. Jones is still young enough to be part of a winning 2014 and beyond team, as is Wieters.

At some point you have to acknowledge the counterpoint, whether you agree with it or not. That being, we can likely get more value for Jones for less money and put the team in a better overall position him by dealing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point you have to acknowledge the counterpoint, whether you agree with it or not. That being, we can likely get more value for Jones for less money and put the team in a better overall position him by dealing him.

I think the team would be hurt more than helped by dealing Jones.

First of all you aren't going to get back a ton of value for him. Teams don't view him as a superstar and he's likely worth more to the Orioles than he would be in a trade.

They will look at all the same things that have been brought up in this thread.

We aren't trading a Justin Upton type player at this point. People are overestimating the return.

Bullpen arms aren't as worth as much as Jones could be moving forward and that's likely all you'd get for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the team would be hurt more than helped by dealing Jones

Then that's it, we're essentially done as that's the real point. I disagree. If we had more in the way of financial resources I'd love to keep Jones. Considering the likely resources available and my assessment of Jones' potential upside, it's my opinion he'd net more value in trade. I also disagree with your premise he'd net nothing more than "bullpen arms".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then that's it, we're essentially done as that's the real point. I disagree. If we had more in the way of financial resources I'd love to keep Jones. Considering the likely resources available and my assessment of Jones' potential upside, it's my opinion he'd net more value in trade. I also disagree with your premise he'd net nothing more than "bullpen arms".

How limited do you think our resources are?

Who else do you want to extend or sign with those resources, and why would they sign with Baltimore when they just traded one of their best players considered to be part of their core?

As for extensions, who do you want to lock up besides Wieters?

I don't see Jones limiting payroll as there aren't too many other players in the organization worth looking at as LT pieces. We can handle a 5/60 deal for him.

And as I said if you deal him, you won't have to worry about signing any high priced FAs because nobody wil come here at all to be part of a rebuilding squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that Jones is rated highly enough by other GMs that someone would be willing to overpay for him - but I'd think that it would have to happen no later than this offseason in order to maximize his value. If you can get someone to overpay for him then I don't see how you don't trade him.

Having said that I'll be amazed if he gets traded.

I wonder if the hometown thing plays for San Diego. If they'd be willing to overpay to get him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...