Jump to content

Adam Jones on XM


baltfan

Recommended Posts

I would assume we are coming down to the final 7-10 days where we need to make a deal or look to fill voids through FA cause they're gonna need a game plan going into spring training. Plus AM mentioned that the last week of Jan was their deadline to making a deal happen.

Of course anything could happen, even if it's during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would go as far as Penn, I think. I wouldn't like it, but I'd do it.

Bedard, Penn and Payton

for

Jones, Morrow, Clement, Chen and Sherrill.

That sounds like a pretty fair offer in my opinion. Do you think Seattle would be willing to take on Penn / Payton for Morrow / Chen?

This assumes that Bedard would fetch Jones, Clement and Sherrill, of course.

If I were Seattle I would wonder about it - but Penn does stand a chance to bounce back, he still has potential and Payton would serve as a great utility / backup OF if WLad does not work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds like a pretty fair offer in my opinion. Do you think Seattle would be willing to take on Penn / Payton for Morrow / Chen?

This assumes that Bedard would fetch Jones, Clement and Sherrill, of course.

If I were Seattle I would wonder about it - but Penn does stand a chance to bounce back, he still has potential and Payton would serve as a great utility / backup OF if WLad does not work out.

Penn is still an excellent prospect given his age, IMO.

If Seattle balks at this I would be willing to remove Chen from the deal.

To me, Chen is not a dealbreaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penn is still an excellent prospect given his age, IMO.

If Seattle balks at this I would be willing to remove Chen from the deal.

To me, Chen is not a dealbreaker.

Agreed. I would love to have Morrow over Penn with regards to how a future rotation may flush out. Primarily because I think Penn will have a better chance of succeeding in a new environment. Payton / Penn for Morrow (Still sounds harsh if you're Seattle - which obviously, I'm not...) :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Seattle has really offered Jones, Clement, and Sherill, then we shouldn't be far off from a deal. Thats a pretty outstanding offer.

I agree. In that's the offer, then I believe we're only looking at a potential 4th being included.

I can't help but get the feeling that the 4th player may be something of significance for each side which bothers me considering that's a fairly decent return as is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. In that's the offer, then I believe we're only looking at a potential 4th being included.

I can't help but get the feeling that the 4th player may be something of significance for each side which bothers me considering that's a fairly decent return as is.

If its a veteran of significance, then I don't mind from our side, unless we're selling Walker short, which I doubt is the case. If its a young guy, then I think I agree with you depending on the specifics.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the board, glorydays.

I think you're misreading the article. Nowhere does it say that the Rays offered Young straight up for Miller. I think it means that the Indians turned them down when they asked Miller to be part of the return package (it's poorly written, I know).

Thanks PaulFolk! You may be correct, but I believe the point is that the Indians obviously place a higher value on Miller than what we here at OH do. After all, from the talk I hear here we would have him included in a package for BROB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its a veteran of significance, then I don't mind from our side, unless we're selling Walker short, which I doubt is the case. If its a young guy, then I think I agree with you depending on the specifics.

Actually, I was thinking it was a 4th player from Seattle. From the sound of the article, we're asking for Jones, Clement, Sherril and either Tillman or Triumfel (if no Morrow is included). Pretty stiff stuff IMO.

McPhail is showing us his dark side - I love it. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...