Jump to content

Adam Jones on XM


baltfan

Recommended Posts

There is always a price for everything, it is just a matter of finding out what that price is. Heck, I could drop my car in the reservoir, drag it out, place it as is on my driveway, and put it up for sale. Eventually someone would buy it. The price is just going to be really low

Unfortunately, the return for Mora will probably be a lot less than the O's want, or they will have to eat a significant portion of his salary.

At this point, I dont think anyone really cares what we get back for Mora.

We just want him gone so we can Moore/Constanzo a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
As great as it would be to land those four prospects from Seattle, I would vomit in my mouth if Penn was a throw-in. It would be ridiculously stupid of the O's to trade Penn right now. His trade value is low. He fits in with the team's plan of stockpiling good young pitching talent. His stats in the minors indicate to me that he's a better bet to be a good SP in the league than almost any of the other young pitching prospects in the organization. Penn should not be a throw-in at this point in time. Just because he has had injury issues and a supposed 'attitude' problem does NOT mean that the team is free to discard him in any future rebuilding plans.

True, but you can only have so many of the same prospects. I like Penn myself, I really don't care which prospect they throw in, could be Olsen/Liz/Patten etc. etc. If we can use one of them to finish off a deal like that with the potential Tillman and Triunfel have I would do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but you can only have so many of the same prospects. I like Penn myself, I really don't care which prospect they throw in, could be Olsen/Liz/Patten etc. etc. If we can use one of them to finish off a deal like that with the potential Tillman and Triunfel have I would do it.

I'd have to disagree with Liz or Patten because Liz has a high ceiling to grow still and Patten has number 2 potential. Makes sense since they were ranked number 2 and 3 in our organization respectively...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am fairly certain that there never were any confirmations.

We really have no idea whether the Cubs offer was any good or not. We have no idea if we can use it as leverage with CLE either. It's nice to talk about Gallagher+Marshall/Muton+EPat/Cedeno or Miller+Gutierrez+Barfield, but that might not even be close. Maybe each of those deals only have/had 2 players.

I really would like to have BR traded though. I can;t see his value any higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to disagree with Liz or Patten because Liz has a high ceiling to grow still and Patten has number 2 potential. Makes sense since they were ranked number 2 and 3 in our organization respectively...

I agree, but the general idea is that we have some surplus that we can trade. I like several of the O's pitching prospects and would be sad to see them go, but we have to give up something to get something. It might sting a little to lose one of them, but we have enough others to make up for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the Orioles make no more moves.....

are they really out of it for 08?

they would have a rotation that still had bedard, guthrie and Loewen in it. the lineup would look something like this:

Roberts

Mora

Markakis

Millar/Huff/ Left Fielder ( forget his name)

R. Hernandez

Patterson/Redman

L Hernandez

Left fielder/ millar/huff

DH ( whoever)

And I think the bullpen will be better than what it was. Im excited to see what Sarfate can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone answer this question: what was the Cubs actual confirmed best offer for BRob?

The alleged aborted deal was Gallagher , Marshall, & Cedeno per Tony's contacts

I would take Gallagher ... I believe he could be a possible 2 .... Just my opinion

Would not say no to Miller, but durability seems to be a big question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just remember that during the Beckett discussions there was one night when a couple of our players were actually pulled right before a game in anticipation of a trade and that trade never went down. Nonetheless I am hopeful.

I don't remember us trying to trade for Beckett. I remember Burnette but no Beckett. That would have rocked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the Orioles make no more moves.....

are they really out of it for 08?

they would have a rotation that still had bedard, guthrie and Loewen in it. the lineup would look something like this:

Roberts

Mora

Markakis

Millar/Huff/ Left Fielder ( forget his name)

R. Hernandez

Patterson/Redman

L Hernandez

Left fielder/ millar/huff

DH ( whoever)

And I think the bullpen will be better than what it was. Im excited to see what Sarfate can do.

If by 'IT' you mean the division cellar, I don't think so, but maybe we'll get lucky and finish fourth again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the Orioles make no more moves.....

are they really out of it for 08?

they would have a rotation that still had bedard, guthrie and Loewen in it. the lineup would look something like this:

Roberts

Mora

Markakis

Millar/Huff/ Left Fielder ( forget his name)

R. Hernandez

Patterson/Redman

L Hernandez

Left fielder/ millar/huff

DH ( whoever)

And I think the bullpen will be better than what it was. Im excited to see what Sarfate can do.

Out of what? There's no way the team, as currently constructed, would be in anything. The offense needs to improve in runs scored (finished 9th last season) and the change from Tejada to LH coupled with the change from the rotation of LF's to Luke Scott won't improve the offense that much. The pitching--despite Bedard's brilliant season--finished 13th in the league in runs allowed. Even if Loewen, Guthrie, and DCab took decent steps forward in their development, it wouldn't be enough.

This team absolutely cannot afford to stand pat. They would not contend for anything. They would be no closer to contending in the near future either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see the Phillies having interest in Mora, nor should they. They've got Greg Dobbs for 3B, who is a much better player than Mora (or at least should be).

This isn't even remotely true.

Dobbs was worth 3.3 less wins last year according to WARP3 and that was in the lesser league and a better hitter's park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • High school players are also less likely to make the majors than college players. Picking Abrams or Witt would also increase the chances your 1:1 pick is a bust, or at least less than you hoped for. When I say Adley wasn't a "safe" pick, I meant that the Orioles didn't sacrifice much, if any, ceiling to raise the floor. I remember the vast majority of pundits saying that Adley was the most likely player in the draft to be an excellent baseball player. A few said they thought Witt or Abrams had a higher ceiling, but they also were less likely to reach it than Adley. And even they were like, "slightly higher ceiling, much lower floor, and C is more valuable than SS." Even if more all-star level players come out of high school, in that particular draft Adley was a special player who had a super high floor and a super high ceiling. The fact that high school players are more likely in general to be all-stars shouldn't blind one to the fact that there was an incredibly special college talent available at 1:1. Bottom line is the idea that the O's should have picked anyone other than Adley in that draft was a small minority opinion on draft day, and the fact that Witt and maybe Abrams ended up hitting their ceilings doesn't change the fact that Adley was the obvious choice with the information available at the time, and it's not like it didn't work out awesome for us. I would say Adley is definitely more likely to be a HOF than Abrams and probably Witt, too.
    • Yeah, but Westburg has become such a staple to the lineup and begun to establish himself offensively I thought they might do the Gunnar thing and say 3B is yours.  No more back and forth. 
    • I'm rambling now, but the 1928 A's may have been one of the coolest teams ever to hang around. Not only did they have a bunch of these old IL Orioles, and an unbelievable stock of young talent. But Mack had brought in some old guys, I guess to provide leadership and mentoring and the like. So on this one team they had the younger HOFs: Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jimmie Foxx, Lefty Grove. They had the Orioles in Boley, Bishop, Grove, Earnshaw. But on top of all that, they had 41-year-old Ty Cobb, 40-year-old Tris Speaker, 41-year-old Eddie Collins, 44-year-old Jack Quinn, and 35-year-old Bullet Joe Bush. Of course Cobb, Speaker, and Collins are inner-circle HOFers, among the best to ever play their position. Quinn was a grandfathered spitballer, probably worthy of a book or three, who won 96 games in his 40s and pitched his last MLB game at the age of 50. And Bush had a 17-year career where he won 196 games. The '28 A's won 98 games and only finished 2.5 games behind a Yanks team that was the freakin' '27 Yanks the year before. For '29 Mack say goodbye to Cobb, Speaker, made Collins a coach, plugged in the kids, and ran away with the league for three straight years. Until the Depression hit, Connie didn't have any other sources of income or wealth, and for the 2nd time had to sell off his stars to make payroll.
    • If they really want to get his bat going, send him to Delmarva!
    • Sounds like the FO believes Norby and Mayo (both righties) need to work more on their defense Holliday and Stowers (both lefties) need to work more on their hitting
    • Not to take away from Drungo's "Old Timey baseball" review segment, Cowser's early season SSS success against lefties has been pretty notable. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...