Jump to content

Ray's extend Archer to 6yr deal


Justinlstn

Recommended Posts

I don't really understand why this was reported as a 6 year extension. It includes this season, which is already underway. So only the option years are years that he would have been eligible for free agency. Great deal by Archer to lock down this much guaranteed money, new record for a player with as little service time as he had. These deals make a lot more sense for pitchers than for hitters due to the increased possibility of missing seasons due to injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm a little surprised. There is some risk here for the Rays.

Last season Archer's BB/9 fell to 2.7 in 128 innings. His minor league BB/9 was 5.0 in 8 seasons. Even the year before was 4.0 and 4.4 in the MLB and MiLb respectively.

I'm not saying he's not a good arm, but outside of last year he's been super walk prone. I guess an AAV of 4.1 for a top to mid rotation starter is a nice value, but they could've gone year to year. Unless he's really figured it that is. There's a non zero chance his walk rate regresses and his performance is just plain average. Anyway, I'm sure they weighed the risk. It would be nice to see them miss on one of these early lock ups, for our sake that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a great deal for the Rays, $25 million for TOR starter for six years.

Well like I said it is really a 5 year deal for $25 million. And one of those years he could make the minimum. They are buying out his four arbitration years for $24.5 million (nearly two full seasons in advance).

About the most he could have gotten as a Super 2 (barring a Cy Young Award) is $5 million. Buster Posey got $8 million coming off of two MVP seasons, but $5 million seems to be the non-Posey max. There is actually a great comp in-house for this deal, and that is David Price. Price earned 4.35 million in 2012 as a super two and then won 20 games, a Cy Youmg, and racked up 6.9 WAR and quickly became too expensive for the Rays. If Archer does that, obviously he is a steal for the Rays.

The more likely outcome is that Archer continues to be a very good pitcher and would go from 4.5 million as a Super 2 to something like 6-9-12 over his remaining arbitration years. The Rays then have 20 million dollars over two years of options, which could give them plenty of surplus value. But there is always the possibility that he could blow out his arm on his next start. I like this deal for the Rays, but this is the first deal I have seen for a player under one year of service time where I really liked it for the player as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Publix sells a brand in the frozen section.
    • Wet Leg has won three Grammys! Pixies considered mainstream now? I'm an Iron Maiden fan from way back. Singer/Songwriter folk artists like Bob Dylan, Suzanne Vega and Tracy Chapman. It's just finding stuff on the periphery is more rewarding.
    • Poke via Uber is a bold move. Cheers, sir.
    • What mainstream music do you like? Or is a never ending attempt at being a hipster? Like, you can admit you like some Led Zeppelin or Motley Crue’s first two. 
    • Farewell to Ryan McKenna, claimed on waivers by the Giants after being DFA'd the other day. We all have followed his career since his great 2018 season at Frederick. Ryan Mountcastle,  Cedric Mullins, and Nick Vespi are now the three remaining members of the Orioles 2015 draft class still in the organization.
    • I can see Adley aging on the Posey curve. He probably has until age 35 before he will hang up the spikes/be a negative valued baseball player. IMO Adley's defense is average, he has a below average throwing arm. But his bat is excellent. And there is no arguing that his presence has made a tremendous impact since the very first day that he stepped onto a Major League field for the O's. Gunnar may not extend because of Boras and the same may turn out to be the case for Holliday. But that should not preclude us from locking up the other guys who prove to be special. Right now Adley is that IMO and Westburg appears to be working his way toward that. But even if we do not extend our own guys, we should bring in others who will sign and impact winning in a positive manner.  Again IMO, not spending and cutting cost is not the way to go for franchise viability/growth. Customers/fans are more informed than ever and have more entertainment options than ever. Your message to them cannot be come out to see the Orioles just because we are the Orioles or "Hey we will probably win more than we lose (like the Rays) but won't make any real efforts to seize opportunities (by spending) when they are there." San Diego doesn't have a problem with fan engagement/attendance even though they don't/haven't won big because they have captured the attention of that market and become relevant by signing star players. And showing their fanbase that they are invested. I am not saying that I want to be like the Padres, but I certainly want the O's to be/remain relevant in this market (like they are now). Every time I take my kids to games, they are excited to go (in particular my youngest). That is how you capture the next generation of O's fans - by being relevant. 3 years ago I couldn't get my kids to go to an Orioles game no matter what! Conversely, I have never had that issue with the Ravens. They've always wanted to attend their games (even practices/training camp).
    • I see Toronto has lost the first two to Tampa for a 3-game losing streak after John Schneider's emotional proclamation of a "big win for May 14th" Monday night. They were up 4-0 with Gausman heading into the 6th today, but....nope.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...