Jump to content

J Upton...(Traded to SD)


srh523

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 418
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Admittedly I haven't read through this thread because I think Upton is a ridiculous name to go after based on Atlanta's asking price so sorry if this has been gone over but...

Why would we want to give up a top prospect for a single season of a great player? I get it that he is good and will make up the offense of Cruz but at what cost for a single season?? To win in this division you have to be consistently good and wait in the weeds for years like last year when BOS and NY are having down years and hope that your team is running on all (or most) cylinders. There is no real "go all out" approach that can do us any good against our behemoth pocketbook rivals so why bank what could be a consistent TOR pitcher over many seasons on a single season when BOS and NY spend and spend and spend so their ceiling is always going to be consistently higher?

I may have gotten off track a bit but count me out of understanding how this makes sense unless an extension period is granted, which it won't.

You get the pick so it's not like you just get a year of Upton. I wouldn't have a problem giving up someone like Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Duquette recently say there have been no discussions about Upton.

He did. he also said there would probably be no trades. That he would be looking at free agent acquisitions. Before someone gets excited. Nolan Reimold is a free agent. As is Johan Santana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need the short term upgrade of offense nearly as much as we need long term pitching depth.

You are right here. All this talk though, got me to thinking about giving someone up in a trade, if we replace lost talent via trading. That means additional costs, ie., whoever we give in a trade is additional costs over and above the cost of lost talent we incurred by not keeping what we had. If it is working don't fix it. Again, talent and good breaks win Championships, not money saved by not getting the talent or by letting talent go, only to have to spend to replace such talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More for Upton than Heyward? That's nice. We weren't even going to give the same as they got for Heyward.

Why would they get more for Upton than Heyward? Both are one year rentals and Heyward is coming off three seasons of 5.8, 3.4 and 6.3 rWAR while Upton's last three years are 2.5, 2.4 and 3.3. Meanwhile Upton will make $14.5 million next year and Heyward will make $7.8 million. Upton ought to be cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they get more for Upton than Heyward? Both are one year rentals and Heyward is coming off three seasons of 5.8, 3.4 and 6.3 rWAR while Upton's last three years are 2.5, 2.4 and 3.3. Meanwhile Upton will make $14.5 million next year and Heyward will make $7.8 million. Upton ought to be cheaper.

They had to dump Heyward cheap to make room for Markakis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If its  just a forearm strain and it’s just 15 days we should consider ourselves lucky. 
    • I never saw this posted. Basically he was just bad for the Orioles.
    • Yep..I thought Mullins was directly due to injuries but maybe not. 
    • Same. I think he's capable of being a 20+ HR guy with regular AB's.    Right now he doesn't have to be Barry Bonds in order to be an upgrade over any of the 3. It's a plus that he hits lefties at a decent clip too.
    • And they were two of the team's better hitters in the first half last year. At that July 1 date both were still over .800 OPS. 
    • Many of Brown's quippy/punny references go over my head because of my age. But I don't mind them, and sometimes the ones I do catch get me thinking of one-upping or responding to them. (If inn a home game one of JoJo's college teammates singled with a man on first and the runner advanced two bases, they were standin' on the corners in Prescott, Arizona.) That stuff doesn't bother me because it ordinarily lasts only a few seconds and rarely interferes with the game or with something about baseball that Ben or Jim would have said. I'm not turned off by the fact that Brown's efforts to show the world how clever he is sometimes make him sound (as well as look) like an insecure teenager. What really bugs me about Brown is his tendency to go off on long tangents, sometimes alone or and sometimes with the color guy, about stuff unrelated to the game: ice cream, the food they're eating, Ben's experience at LSU, etc., etc., often having him demonstrate that he knows more about something than Ben or Jim. During that time the game, and reflections on what has happened or might happen next, don't seem to matter. I'm listening while I watch a televised game because I believe the announcers will enhance mu understanding of the game, the teams and the players. I'm not interested in the announcers' views on unrelated stuff. ) And for me Brown's teasing of McDonald about his lack of sophistication, or whatever quality it is that Brown likes to make fun of, got old a long time ago.  
    • And on top of that Santander is putting up a .564 OPS versus RHP this year, but he's hitting 1.027 OPS against LHP. The outfield is a problem and there's no reason Stowers shouldn't be seeing significant playing time if he's going to be on the the roster.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...