Jump to content

Do the standings rank teams based on ROI or Wins?


JR Oriole

Recommended Posts

I have to give you folks who are being so patient and not getting frustrated a lot of credit.....I am not one of those people though. There is plenty of winter left, but I don't know how it is that we have done nothing while teams like the Royals and Padres have been active. I am sorry, are we going to create the illusion that they have more money than we do? Seriously?

As long as we have the end objective of maximizing our wins in the standings and the FO is not trying to maximize the bang for our buck and sacrificing everything else, I am good. The Orioles have plenty of "budget people" and accountants who they actually pay to worry about that stuff.....for me, the only budget I care about is my own. So if the Os want to spend $300 million, fine by me. If they want to spend $30 million, fine by me. I am not interested in being a GM or even playing one hypothetically. I don't care about WAR, FIP, or any of these other stats....all I care about is wins. As long as the Os win enough games to get to the playoffs and then win 11 more once they are there, I am a very happy fan.

Saving money just for the sake of saving money is weak....I have no guarantees from the FO that they will eventually spend it one day. I could choose not to take my family on vacations every year just to watch my bank account get fatter, or I could drop some coin and create memories that will last forever.

We have potentially a short window of time to win a title....unless we really are Oakland, I wish we would stop acting like Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to give you folks who are being so patient and not getting frustrated a lot of credit.....I am not one of those people though. There is plenty of winter left, but I don't know how it is that we have done nothing while teams like the Royals and Padres have been active. I am sorry, are we going to create the illusion that they have more money than we do? Seriously?

As long as we have the end objective of maximizing our wins in the standings and the FO is not trying to maximize the bang for our buck and sacrificing everything else, I am good. The Orioles have plenty of "budget people" and accountants who they actually pay to worry about that stuff.....for me, the only budget I care about is my own. So if the Os want to spend $300 million, fine by me. If they want to spend $30 million, fine by me. I am not interested in being a GM or even playing one hypothetically. I don't care about WAR, FIP, or any of these other stats....all I care about is wins. As long as the Os win enough games to get to the playoffs and then win 11 more once they are there, I am a very happy fan.

Saving money just for the sake of saving money is weak....I have no guarantees from the FO that they will eventually spend it one day. I could choose not to take my family on vacations every year just to watch my bank account get fatter, or I could drop some coin and create memories that will last forever.

We have potentially a short window of time to win a title....unless we really are Oakland, I wish we would stop acting like Oakland.

Ninety Six. Or Ninety Nine.

That way.

And we are not Oakland. But we are not Chicago either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saving money just for the sake of saving money is weak....I have no guarantees from the FO that they will eventually spend it one day. I could choose not to take my family on vacations every year just to watch my bank account get fatter, or I could drop some coin and create memories that will last forever.

.

I agree with this in general wholeheartedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do baseball owners operate their teams as a personal entertainment or a business?

I suppose they operate teams as both, but my problem is I don't care about the business part of it. To me, sports is about entertainment and winning. I understand why the business part of it matters to owners, but why should it matter to me? I want wins and titles. I don't love the Orioles because they are so savvy with their contracts. I can choose a Fortune 500 company to love if that is all that matters. I love the Orioles because they have been my team for over 30 years and I want to see them win....period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose they operate teams as both, but my problem is I don't care about the business part of it. To me, sports is about entertainment and winning. I understand why the business part of it matters to owners, but why should it matter to me? I want wins and titles. I don't love the Orioles because they are so savvy with their contracts. I can choose a Fortune 500 company to love if that is all that matters. I love the Orioles because they have been my team for over 30 years and I want to see them win....period.

Your take on all of this seems to be the healthiest. Judge the product not the process and don't get hung up on how much they should be or shouldn't be spending. The reality is that no one on this board has any real insight into the money side of the Baltimore Orioles. The only thing one can comment on with any amount of factual evidence is the overall philosophy of the organization. (i.e actions speak louder than words) To me it makes no sense to complain about not signing $200mm baseball players when it is beyond obvious that it would run counter to the philosophy being utilized. A philosophy by the way that has worked pretty well over the past 3 year. I suppose I prefer to judge moves (as I do like the stats and money side of baseball) within the context of the current philosophy.

I am not happy with how this offseason has played out but unlike a few on here I am willing to wait to see the final product. I think our current GM has earned that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a fan, I want my team to win now, but also be in position to win fairly consistently. That means signing players to contracts that can stay within a well-planned budget, and choosing priorities.

According to BB-ref, the O's spent $77 mm in 2012, $101 mm in 2013, $109 mm this year. Duquette has stated that he expects the 2015 payroll to be higher than 2014's, and enough to field a team that can be highly competitive. Based on his three-year track record, that's good enough for me right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROI = Team Wins/Payroll. I would actually be curious to see the results of this stat.

I would too. I have to think Oakland wins this one. I don't know what their payroll is, but most of the time I don't even know who their players are so that leads me to believe they are pretty high up there. Every year, they look like a 62 win team on paper....but they routinely win over 90.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a fan, I want my team to win now, but also be in position to win fairly consistently. That means signing players to contracts that can stay within a well-planned budget, and choosing priorities.

According to BB-ref, the O's spent $77 mm in 2012, $101 mm in 2013, $109 mm this year. Duquette has stated that he expects the 2015 payroll to be higher than 2014's, and enough to field a team that can be highly competitive. Based on his three-year track record, that's good enough for me right now.

I haven't looked at the arb scenarios, but I do not see how you are going to reduce the payroll by $21mm per year (Markakis $13mm net and Cruz $8mm) and raise the payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose they operate teams as both, but my problem is I don't care about the business part of it. To me, sports is about entertainment and winning. I understand why the business part of it matters to owners, but why should it matter to me? I want wins and titles. I don't love the Orioles because they are so savvy with their contracts. I can choose a Fortune 500 company to love if that is all that matters. I love the Orioles because they have been my team for over 30 years and I want to see them win....period.

I'm with you all the way on this, but if you expect a team owner to jeopardize his earnings for your pleasure or his you will be sorely disappointed. Apparently, you are.

I don't care how much money Angelos makes, but it's my choice to temper my expectations of player acquisitions with reality, just as it's your choice to not. As I see it, your unhappiness is your own creation because your expectations are unrealistic.

As long as we keep winning as we have, I'm satisfied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I guess my question would be this: what is the level of production he would have to have to make it okay for Westburg/Ortiz to stay down? Does this production even exist? I am also assuming with this question that those 2 are producing in AAA.
    • Here is   the issues the MSA is running into with the stadium improvement financing. *As of March 13, 2023, project is cancelled. Project will rebid but no definite date yet.** https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/news/2023/03/07/baltimore-ravens-stadium-upgrades-financing.html After promising the Baltimore Ravens up to $600 million worth of upgrades to their stadium if the team resigned its lease, the Maryland Stadium Authority is now exploring how to finance those renovations amid a difficult economic environment. Chief Financial Officer David Raith told the Stadium Authority’s board on Tuesday that the agency won’t be able to finance $435 million in planned improvements to M&T Bank Stadium with only tax-exempt bonds and is seeking the OK to find a bank loan or other financing to pay for up to $200 million of the project costs. Financing updates to the Baltimore Ravens stadium primarily using tax-exempt bonds, a cheaper option, won’t work because those types of bonds have to be spent in a three-year period. If the money is not spent in three years, Raith said the authority would be at risk of being penalized by the Internal Revenue Service. “I knew there was no way we could spend $600 million in three years,” Raith told the Baltimore Business Journal after the meeting. Raith wants to split the $435 million cost into two methods of financing — $235 million in tax-exempt revenue bonds and $200 million in taxable financing. That money could be raised through a letter of credit, a taxable bond deal or a bank loan. Acquiring taxable debt will be costly as Raith predicted the $200 million in taxable financing would have an interest rate of 5.6%, compared to 3.6% for the tax-exempt bonds. He said the agency would prefer a bank loan for the $200 million because the agency would not have to pay interest until it starts using the loan funds, which could save millions of dollars a year. But Raith said he first needs to see if there are any lenders interested in ponying up the money. “I just don’t know whether there is enough commitment from the banking community for something like that,” he said. The renovations are part of a plan by the state to incentivize both the Ravens and Orioles to stay put in Baltimore. The Maryland General Assembly last year passed House Bill 896, which allowed the stadium authority to borrow $1.2 billion in bonds to pay for improvements to both stadiums. The stadium improvement funds were used as a carrot to get the teams to sign long-term leases. Once the team signed a lease, it would then get access to $600 million. The Ravens in January signed a 15-year lease extension that keeps the team at M&T Bank Stadium until 2037. The signing of the lease started a one-year period for the stadium authority to get financing in place for planned upgrades to M&T Bank Stadium. The Ravens could not be reached for comment. To get all $435 million for renovations financed as quickly as possible, the stadium authority approved a measure on Tuesday allowing Raith to start exploring how he wants to secure the $200 million in taxable borrowing. But the authority also needs the Maryland General Assembly to pass legislation that would allow dual financing for the project. House Bill 524 introduced in Annapolis would create separate financing funds for both the Ravens and Orioles project costs. The clock is ticking for Raith to secure this funding. He said a potential increase by the Federal Reserve of the federal interest rate could cost the authority and taxpayers millions more. “With rising interest rates, the [Maryland Stadium Authority] is trying to get to market as soon as possible to get the best interest rates and generate as much money as possible to ensure we can complete the projects,” Raith said. Unlike the Ravens, the Orioles have yet to sign a lease. The Orioles' lease is up at the end of 2023 and Raith said if the Orioles sign a long-term lease the stadium authority would have to repeat this process again. Raith said he was surprised that the Ravens lease agreement happened first because the team's deal still had five years left on it. “I don’t think anyone expected that the Ravens would be the first ones to the plate because the Orioles' lease was the one that really was a top priority,” Raith said
    • Someone should ask him about maybe having the highest prices for beer of any team? This is at the new market stores. 16oz beers are $10.99 for domestic and $12.49 for craft, hard, seltzers, or imported beers. 24oz beers are $14.99 for domestic and $15.75 for imports or hard seltzers. 12oz canned cocktails are $12.99.
    • I would say "stunning".... but is it, really?
    • Don't like this answer either.He is going to do Baltimore a favor and give them a gift. Don't trust him. Plus the Ravens stadium improvement money may not all come from bonds and maybe have to partially pay it off with a bank loan. As the MSA said the longer you wait on the financing, the more it will cost the taxpayers. I have heard the longer you wait and with interest rates rising the State is not sure the Orioke improvements can all be done with public funds.   The Orioles will play their first home game next Thursday, and Gov. Wes Moore and his children will throw out the first pitch. The Orioles’ current lease with the state of Maryland, its landlord, expires at the end of the year. Angelos has said that he hopes signing a long-term lease can be an “All-Star break gift,” meaning the deal would be done by early July. He didn’t provide an update on timing Thursday when asked, but said “we’re going to come through” when it comes to the lease. “There’s no question about it,” he said.
    • During the game, Angelos was asked if the Orioles would seek contract extensions with players such as Rutschman or top rookie Gunnar Henderson. Other teams have signed young players to long-term deals to avoid losing them later in free agency. For example, Wander Franco signed an 11-year, $182 million deal with the Tampa Bay Rays — a small-market team like the Orioles — this offseason. The Cleveland Guardians, another franchise Angelos pointed to as a team the Orioles would like to emulate, this week signed their young star, Andrés Giménez, to a seven-year contract reportedly worth $106.5 million. Angelos first pointed to the difficulty that small market teams face in MLB as compared to the NFL but did say he hoped that executive vice president and general manager Mike Elias would be able to extend the team’s young talent.   They’re going to do what they can within the system that they’re in. Does that mean extensions? Absolutely, I would hope so. But you gotta go with the system you’re in. It’s much, much, much tougher to be in the baseball system than in the football or basketball system,” he said.
    • “It’s an interesting concept and I saw that my good friends at The Baltimore Sun wanted to weigh in on that today. When the hedge fund that owns The Baltimore Sun, based in New York City, wants to open their books, I guess we’ll take a look at that. It’s difficult for me to understand what that fascination is,” Angelos said in the interview during the Orioles’ 10-9 win over the host Boston Red Sox on opening day.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...