Jump to content

March 4th versus Cardinals


baseballnelie

Recommended Posts

Card's announcers are just praising the Luke Scott move. Predicting he could hit 40 HR's playing in Camden yards. That would rock

He's working the count too. He's fouled off the last four pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Loewen was a little rough in the 1st, but did well working out of a jam. The Dodgers started their everyday lineup yesterday and we dominated until Esteban made his way to the mound. I'd like to see us continue to pitch strong with Cardinal backups filling a lot of spots in the lineup today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke Scott and Ramon Hernandez both worked the count well and we know that Millar can too. It's nice to see.

Sounds like DT's philosophy of patience at the plate is being implemented thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millar is in the way. The fact that he can get a single and work the count does not justify his placement at DH/1B or batting fourth in the order. And you'll notice that Scott Moore's not in the lineup today...right?

You need to get rid of a couple of people or Moore may not even make the team. While nobody likes Gibbons and many want Mora, Payton or Huff moved, it's hard to do given their contracts.Millar is cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe in Adam Jones, but he's much more raw than I expected from the scouting reports. That throw would be a killer in a real game. He just hasn't been anywhere near a finished product as Nick was when he debuted, as far as playing the field is concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millar is in the way. The fact that he can get a single and work the count does not justify his placement at DH/1B or batting fourth in the order. And you'll notice that Scott Moore's not in the lineup today...right?

You need to get rid of a couple of people or Moore may not even make the team. While nobody likes Gibbons and many want Mora, Payton or Huff moved, it's hard to do given their contracts.Millar is cheap.

Millar isn't in anyone's way. If Moore is ready he'll force a move. Either he'll get traded or we'll trade Millar. And, if that takes some time to work it's way out, no big deal. With a job this big, I don't expect AM to get everything done right away. This roster is likely to be a work in progress throughout the season.

Finally, Moore's not playing in an exhibition game and that's supposed to mean something? I guess Terrero is blocking Markakis, by that logic. Guys get days off all the time in spring training. To read something into that today is a stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • From what I can tell the xAcc is about the mix pitches they get. It is estimating "likelihood a given pitch is called correctly." Has nothing to with the skill of the umpire. So if he had a low xAcc that game, it would mean he had a lot of pitches on the edge of the strike zone or for whatever reason their algo thinks they were hard pitches to call.  https://umpscorecards.com/explainers/accuracy So this scorecard is saying that for the particular mix of pitches Laz got, he did better than expected and this could be considered a good game. I say that's dead wrong. 
    • Definitely he was being diplomatic.  He'd have the best view of it and it wasn't like it was just off the corner, that was practically down the middle.  The whole ball was in the strike zone.  
    • I just don't see any justifiable reason why this isn't implemented.  I don't see why the umpire union would have an issue with it and it would make sure the calls are right.  We're already testing it in the minors.  Just bite the bullet and do it already.  Umpires don't lose jobs because they're still back there calling the plays.  The only ones who get mad about it is the old tradionalist's that consistently use the "human element" argument.  Which to me, is a crock.  So frustrating to watch constant mistakes when they easily can be rectified.  
    • FWIW, Kremer didn't know it was blown (according to post-game interview). Either that or he's a level 20 diplomat.
    • Early in the year there wasn't room for a 10th round $100K pick.  Early in the season, the lineup at several times was literally the highest signing bonus to the lowest.  In Norfolk, it is still developmental and the $$$ gets developed.  It doesn't make business sense to prioritize low/late round picks.  If they happen to develop... it is likely on their own doing in their own time. As pointed out in another thread, Cook's EV isn't not the best.  His size, speed, etc are not elite.  Nothing, in my opinion, says,  "take me and keep me on the 26 man for the year.  I will prove my worth.".  He is likely good enough to keep on the AAA roster to avoid the MiLB draft and if there are enough injuries to get him an early shot, even then at what level would he have to perform to stay up? Cook is only in his 4th year and the O's have 3 more years (after this year) of control in the minors before he is a FA and can choose not to come back.  With the current AAA pay, it may be enough for him to keep the "grind" and eventually get that cup of coffee.  Look at Banuelos, right spot at right time in a blow out and he will forever be able to say he was an MLB player.
    • It is interesting that Chris Davis‘s career WAR is only 11.8 so aside from that one splendid season he was pretty mediocre.
    • It just doesn't make sense when they have the technology to improve it, to not improve it. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...