Jump to content

Orioles inquired about Melvin Upton, Jr (BlueJays)


Sir_Loin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 811
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It does involve Cashner per Ken. That makes sense to me. Throwing in a prospect in a Ubaldo for Upton alone makes no sense.

24bf8c3ecfc5a1b3b0a52c5e62f59868.png

Rosenthal says the two deals would be completely separate.

Yes, a prospect for Upton makes sense. You can't just deal an asset with no value (Jimenez) for an asset with value (Upton) without a prospect included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The failures of this organization in developing pitching needs to be addressed. In order to be addressed, it needs to be recognized and not denied.

I think connecting the failures of the organization to develop pitching to a Ubaldo salary dump is a huge stretch. The two have almost nothing to do with each other.

The guy had almost 1,300 ML innings when we signed him. This has nothing to do with the organization's "failures in developing pitching."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sat next to the scout's mom that signed Scott at the Rays game. She was a sharp cookie and she thinks Scott will be great as do many within the organization here, just an FYI. I would not trade Scott.

The scouts mom thinks Scott will be great? I'm sold, Scott should officially be off limits. Someone get DD on the horn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won't lose his job, may lose some at bats. Like I said earlier Buck will have to sit one of Alvarez, Upton and Kim vs RHP.

That gives up some good depth on the bench for PH situations and base running(Rickard or Upton).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And logic would dictate you sit the one with bad splits vs. RHP.

Why make the trade then? For 2017 it helps but they shouldn't give up a prospect for a platoon OF. Upton will play vs RHP, just a question of how much.

Are they willing to lose a prospect of some value just to free themselves of Ubaldo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
    • Mateo does seem to be that “outsider” guy that a lot of the young guys seem to have good chemistry with. And by outsider I mean, player they didn’t play with in the minors.
    • Btw, this could also be nothing more than them trying him out there for versatility reasons..just shagging fly balls and what not..ala Westburg in the past. May not mean they envision him as a starter out there.
    • Mateo and Gunnar turned a show stopping double play yesterday. Love the finnese and confidence from them both.
    • I don’t think it’s desperate at all.   Having more options is always a good thing, and we know the O’s value defensive versatility.  I can think of many SS types who ended up in CF.   Jackson Merrill, who was a top 10-20 prospect as a SS coming into this season, is now the starting CF for the Padres and a good candidate for NL ROY.   Trea Turner played mostly CF for the Nats in 2016 after his call-up, despite having played SS almost exclusively in the minors.  Robin Yount was moved from SS to CF.  So, I see no harm in experimenting with this.  For now though, this is just a rumor so far as I’m concerned.  
    • I don't expect Mateo to continue to be this good but I'm going to enjoy him while he is. I can't really bring myself to complain about his offensive game when some of our regular hitters have yet to eclipse Mateo's OBP mark. I'll reserve my Mateo complaints for when he is no longer playing like one of our better position players.  I find much more to complain about with Mullins, Santander, Hays, McCann, and Urias. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...