Jump to content

Orioles inquired about Melvin Upton, Jr (BlueJays)


Sir_Loin

Recommended Posts

Upton has no value to the San Diego Padres. Trade saves them 5 million dollars. That is the point for the Padres. How Upton or Ubaldo helps a fantasy team is irrelevant. The fact that Upton is still a Padre makes it pretty clear that teams are not lining up to trade value for him.

I listed several teams that have interest. Just because a trade isn't done doesn't mean anything. Everything I've read, saving money isn't an issue with SD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 811
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I saw him play a bit in Durham coming up for the Rays. Was a really bad SS then. Throwing errors galore. Remember him shining in the '08 postseason. Of course, that's when he was called BJ Upton. I had not kept up with him since he went to the Braves. I was not aware he was not going by BJ anymore. I was wondering if he was related ;)

Found an article explaining the name change.

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/call-him-melvin-bj-upton-drops-nickname-for-fathers-first-name/

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's Ubaldo and a prospect like Edgar Olomos, then I have no problem. We give up a Joe Gunkel, I'm not going to be happy

We have about ten Joe Gunkel's in the organization and so do most other teams. I would expect the Pads want a better player back than that.

Tanner Scott, Garrett Cleavinger......maybe Mike Wright if we are lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's Ubaldo and a prospect like Edgar Olomos, then I have no problem. We give up a Joe Gunkel, I'm not going to be happy

Olmos isn't a prospect. Prospects don't usually bounce around on the waiver wire.

If Gunkel hasn't been called up yet with the mess the rotation has been the last 2 seasons, then I don't see him.being deemed a fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ubaldo for Upton is a great move. We get rid of Ubaldo for someone that may be rejuvenated by coming to a contender, plus he adds defense, power and some speed. If Tanner Scott is the prospect going to SD I wouldn't hesitate to make that trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not I like this deal depends who the prospect is. Tanner Scott wouldn't bother me. He's got some talent, but I don't think he will ever have good enough command to be an elite reliever. And we've been good at finding good bullpen arms in any event.

While it's been mentioned in this thread, I think an underrated aspect of this deal is Upton's defense. Our OF defense has been a trainwreck (and Rickard has been disappointing in that regard) and Upton is a very good defender and good insurance if Jones gets dinged or just needs a day off.

It also might set us up for a second move where we trade a bat in a package for a pitcher.

Finally, let me be the first to say that I won't be shocked if Ubaldo has some success in San Diego. He's still deceptive, and with a change of scenery I could see him getting his act together and being a credible BOR starter. But it's not happening in Baltimore so if we can unload him for someone who can help us this year and next, I'm all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not I like this deal depends who the prospect is. Tanner Scott wouldn't bother me. He's got some talent, but I don't think he will ever have good enough command to be an elite reliever. And we've been good at finding good bullpen arms in any event.

While it's been mentioned in this thread, I think an underrated aspect of this deal is Upton's defense. Our OF defense has been a trainwreck (and Rickard has been disappointing in that regard) and Upton is a very good defender and good insurance if Jones gets dinged or just needs a day off.

It also might set us up for a second move where we trade a bat in a package for a pitcher.

Finally, let me be the first to say that I won't be shocked if Ubaldo has some success in San Diego. He's still deceptive, and with a change of scenery I could see him getting his act together and being a credible BOR starter. But it's not happening in Baltimore so if we can unload him for someone who can help us this year and next, I'm all for it.

I agree. Depends on which prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not I like this deal depends who the prospect is. Tanner Scott wouldn't bother me. He's got some talent, but I don't think he will ever have good enough command to be an elite reliever. And we've been good at finding good bullpen arms in any event.

While it's been mentioned in this thread, I think an underrated aspect of this deal is Upton's defense. Our OF defense has been a trainwreck (and Rickard has been disappointing in that regard) and Upton is a very good defender and good insurance if Jones gets dinged or just needs a day off.

It also might set us up for a second move where we trade a bat in a package for a pitcher.

Finally, let me be the first to say that I won't be shocked if Ubaldo has some success in San Diego. He's still deceptive, and with a change of scenery I could see him getting his act together and being a credible BOR starter. But it's not happening in Baltimore so if we can unload him for someone who can help us this year and next, I'm all for it.

I would also be fine to let Scott go. Pitchers rarely 'learn' control, and wild pitchers are rarely effective for more than short stints.

Upton would be a nice upgrade in the field over Trumbo or Rickard, and having his bat against lefties would be a boost over Reimold.

I really liked Ubaldo's character, but the only way I could stand to watch him pitch was through splayed fingers. Surely San Diego realizes he's got sometimes electric stuff, but his mechanics are a hot mess. If they want to try and fix him, then by all means, go for it. I hope he figures it out, they have nothing to lose overall. But with Baltimore in first place, they can't handle on-the-job reclamation projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • More Corbin Burnes day please. 19 whiffs yesterday for Burnes with curveball generating 5 whiffs (on just 7 swings) and slider generating 7 whiffs (on just 8 swings).  Definitely the best his breaking stuff has looked all year.  Key was starting in zone and dropping out, whereas Burnes had been burying too many into the dirt and not starting the pitches competitively within the zone.  Palmer has mentioned Burnes preference to stay away/away with most offerings, but yesterday Burnes finally seemed to vary location at least a little bit and pitched to more quadrants (sprinkled sinkers in to RHs and cutters in to LHs).  To me that is what made offspeed more effective instead of hitters staying back and looking away/away. 
    • For all the gnashing of teeth from some about him only going 6 innings every time, he's only 1 inning short of Zack Wheeler who is largely considered the best SP in baseball.
    • rWAR is Baseball-Reference (some call it bWAR).  fWAR is Fangraphs.  fWAR now uses OAA as one if its main inputs for defense.   Some people are complete OAA converts and believe it’s vastly superior to the other advanced defensive metrics.  I’m still in the mode of looking at all of them (Fangraphs publishes OAA and it’s old stat UZR, BB-ref publishes Rdrs and Rtot).  If there’s a consensus, I buy it.  If 3 of 4 basically agree, I buy it.  If it’s a split, I go with whichever ones agree with my eye test.   Not exactly scientific but it keeps me sane.    
    • GM John Mozeliak did a 15-minute sit down with the local NBC affiliate a few days ago - some of what was discussed was TV revenue uncertainty.    It was interesting to compare that with the Orioles partnership having the club and network to maneuver with.  
    • I happened to see him yesterday.  The game results aren’t on Savant yesterday but I kept looking for this new cutter and kept seeing 96 mph fastballs and sliders.  Pretty sure Savant showed like a 90% cutter usage before that game.  Now it’s down to 66% and shows more of the fastball and curve.   He have up a double to a LH hitter on a slider but looked good overall.   His last pitch was a 12-6 slider/curve which could be a great swing and miss pitch.  The mechanics looked smooth and the fastball command looked good.  I’m just curious if he was throwing cuttters and they break like sliders or he just wasn’t throwing it yesterday.   Maybe @Tony-OH knows?
    • With the infield depth in the Os pipeline, I'm beginning to think that Holiday should get some run in CF to see if he's capable of being Mullins heir apparent.  Mullins currently is under control thru 2025 and would be a FA in 2026.  Currently, the organizational depth at CF isn't great and I believe with Holiday's body type, he could potentially fit in at that position.  I'd like to see next year's non-pitching roster look something like this: C-Rutschman 1B-Mountcastle 2B-Westburg SS-Henderson 3B-Mayo LF-Cowser CF-Holiday RF-Kjerstad Bench - backup catcher, Hays (2026 FA), Mullins (2026 FA), O'Hearn (2026 FA), Mateo (2026 FA)/Norby
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...