Jump to content

September Call Ups


NCRaven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Unless Sisco has to be added in the offseason to the 40 man to avoid the rule 5 draft, I don't see him getting added.  It would just be wasting his service time.  I could see a guy like Schaffer or Yaz getting a callup and then DFA'd a week after the season ends.  

As discussed elsewhere in this thread, Sisco does have to be added to the 40-man roster in the offseason, or else he is Rule 5 eligible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Unless Sisco has to be added in the offseason to the 40 man to avoid the rule 5 draft, I don't see him getting added.  It would just be wasting his service time.  I could see a guy like Schaffer or Yaz getting a callup and then DFA'd a week after the season ends.  

 

19 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

As discussed elsewhere in this thread, Sisco does have to be added to the 40-man roster in the offseason, or else he is Rule 5 eligible.

I don't really understand the connection between whether we need to add him to the 40-man roster this offseason (we do) and whether calling him up would be wasting his service time.    Any service time accrued will count regardless of whether he would need to be added to the 40-man roster this winter.    And regardless of whether he's added to the 40-man, there's no requirement that he be on the major league roster next year, nor does service time accrue if he's still in the minors.

With all that said, I think there would be some value in getting a look at Sisco in September, as our offseason strategy depends  a bit on whether we think Sisco is ready, especially defensively.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I don't really understand the connection between whether we need to add him to the 40-man roster this offseason (we do) and whether calling him up would be wasting his service time.    Any service time accrued will count regardless of whether he would need to be added to the 40-man roster this winter.    And regardless of whether he's added to the 40-man, there's no requirement that he be on the major league roster next year, nor does service time accrue if he's still in the minors.

With all that said, I think there would be some value in getting a look at Sisco in September, as our offseason strategy depends  a bit on whether we think Sisco is ready, especially defensively.   

Yeah, I don't think there is much of a chance (no pun intended) Sisco breaks camp with the O's next year. It sounds like he needs more reps defensively and will spend a couple months at the beginning of 2018 in Norfolk. Therefore I am not really concerned about his accruing a month of service time this September. They will certainly add at least one additional catcher, whether that is Wynns (who would also need to be added to the 40-man roster in the off-season or be Rule 5 eligible), Sisco or a non-prospect isn't something I am really worried about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

Yeah, I don't think there is much of a chance (no pun intended) Sisco breaks camp with the O's next year. It sounds like he needs more reps defensively and will spend a couple months at the beginning of 2018 in Norfolk. Therefore I am not really concerned about his accruing a month of service time this September. They will certainly add at least one additional catcher, whether that is Wynns (who would also need to be added to the 40-man roster in the off-season or be Rule 5 eligible), Sisco or a non-prospect isn't something I am really worried about.

They said last night during the game that a catcher would be recalled between Sept 1-5.   That is probably Sisco or Pena.   Wynns probably is with the Baysox until they are done with the playoff which could be as late as Sept 16th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bumping this. Why not use the 40-man to help with the rotation down the stretch? You could start any combination of Castro, Bleier, Aquino, and Ramirez and have them pitch a couple of innings each. Leave them in if they are doing OK. You would still have Wright and Wilson for mop up duties. 

Maybe bring in Tommy Hunter or another journeyman type through waiver trade.

There is no reason Tillman or Ubaldo should pitch a single game in September.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2017 at 4:29 PM, wildcard said:

They said last night during the game that a catcher would be recalled between Sept 1-5.   That is probably Sisco or Pena.   Wynns probably is with the Baysox until they are done with the playoff which could be as late as Sept 16th.

I hope the Baysox playoff run doesn't screw him over.

I would rather they bring up Sisco and he gets tested defensively, but they will either bring up Pena, or bring up Sisco and only use him as a PH in games. I want to see MLB players run on him and how he handles it, along with a MLB pitching staff (or atleast something resembling one.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

We have about three spots needed on the 40 (Hardy, Pedro, 3rd catcher).

Who goes?

Hardy takes the open spot on the 40 man roster which is  at 39.

Pedro up/ Verrett DFA'd is my guess something this weekend.

Sisco come up after Monday's Tides game with either Wilson or Ynoa being DFA'd.  Just another guess.

Crichton, Yacabonis and Rickard recalled tomorrow is another guess. They are on the 40 man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Hardy takes the open spot on the 40 man roster which is  at 39.

Pedro up/ Verrett DFA'd is my guess something this weekend.

Sisco come up after Monday's Tides game with either Wilson or Ynoa being DFA'd.  Just another guess.

Crichton, Yacabonis and Rickard recalled tomorrow is another guess. They are on the 40 man.

Okay.  So we never filled that slot from Nuno?  That helps.  I don't want to lose Ynoa.  I think I have Verrett and Wilson as my bottom two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add non-40-man roster guys, you have to drop.  It looks like Verrett is obvious for the catcher.  Who goes for Pedro?   Wilson, Ynoa, Lee on the bubble?     However, Ynoa has been one of the hottest pitchers in the IL since the AS break and he might be viewed as a viable long man for September.  He is on track to start Monday's game unless he is scratched.   

To add a PR like Schaeffer or Yaz another guy must go.   It's unfortunate that the true dead weight guys are Tillman and Ubaldo.

If Hart can't be recalled until next Wed or Thursday due to 10-day rule, we might see Faulkner here pretty soon to give another LHP because he is on the 40-man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dreadnought said:

To add non-40-man roster guys, you have to drop.  It looks like Verrett is obvious for the catcher.  Who goes for Pedro?   Wilson, Ynoa, Lee on the bubble?     However, Ynoa has been one of the hottest pitchers in the IL since the AS break and he might be viewed as a viable long man for September.  He is on track to start Monday's game unless he is scratched.   

To add a PR like Schaeffer or Yaz another guy must go.   It's unfortunate that the true dead weight guys are Tillman and Ubaldo.

If Hart can't be recalled until next Wed or Thursday due to 10-day rule, we might see Faulkner here pretty soon to give another LHP because he is on the 40-man.

Lee has an option next year.  That is another year of development at AAA.  I don't think he gets DFA'd.

Faulkner gives up too many walks.  He hasn't earned a call up IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dreadnought said:

To add non-40-man roster guys, you have to drop.  It looks like Verrett is obvious for the catcher.  Who goes for Pedro?   Wilson, Ynoa, Lee on the bubble?     However, Ynoa has been one of the hottest pitchers in the IL since the AS break and he might be viewed as a viable long man for September.  He is on track to start Monday's game unless he is scratched.   

To add a PR like Schaeffer or Yaz another guy must go.   It's unfortunate that the true dead weight guys are Tillman and Ubaldo.

If Hart can't be recalled until next Wed or Thursday due to 10-day rule, we might see Faulkner here pretty soon to give another LHP because he is on the 40-man.

Not sure if you need a pinch runner if you have both Rickard and Gentry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Another double for Hays tonight, 104 mph.  I believe that’s 7 batted balls of 102+ mph in the last 3 games.   He’s hitting the ball with authority.    In the small accomplishments category, he got his OPS over .600 tonight, after exceeding the .200 BA threshold yesterday.  Not yet respectable, but creeping towards it at a decent rate of speed.  He has a .926 OPS in 15 games/44 PA since returning from the IL on May 15.  
    • Maybe, he went 4.1 innings with 1ER and 9 K's against us this year.
    • excluding last year's draft Elias had only drafted 7 pitchers through the first 10 rounds excluding McLean. Close to 50 picks with less than 15% being pitchers, they deserve more leash on pitching because   1. I remember a rates and barrels podcast with Eno interviewing a Rangers front office guy. One part of the convo was centered around how much easier it is to overhaul hitting development, because there is far less personalization involved. bat speed is bat speed and swing decisions are swing decisions,  easier to develop an org philosophy. looks like they've obviously done that,  the results speak for themselves, so they can move onto pitching,  and it seems pretty clear they're tinkering and trying things out with the 2023 class to see how to infuse pitching customization for individual pitchers- the harder step in turning around a dysfunctional development system. 2. I think about a Kyle Boddy tweet frequently where, I'm paraphrasing, each pitcher has a skill set that can play at the major league level,  you just have to crush the development for each pitcher. You can be bad until you aren't as a pitcher, especially when you're trying to find the perfect mix of pitches that compliments your arm slot, fastball shape, athleticism,  etc. Guys with good shape metrics just have a head start in finding the ideal pitch mix, so I don't really have an issue preselecting for those characteristics, as it'll just make crushing the development easier.  Pitch level data for Os minor leaguers would be fun, sadly we don't have it, as it would be the clearest way to determine what tweaks are working throughout the year that have staying power. Id say the positive starts for Baumeister Forret and Young ready to pop top 100 lists is an encouraging sign.
    • I haven't noticed Zimmerman in the Norfolk box scores lately. I wonder if he's out. He would be a logical solution for one game.
    • I appreciate the article, and I wonder if Mike has a special fondness for “fixing” guys: finding a guy who’s terrible but has an elite spin rate, and turning him into a productive player? I read “Astroball,” which covers Elias’ time with Houston, a couple years ago, but I don’t recall what was the change in draft philosophy, beyond no longer focusing on body type. I wonder if Mike and Sig have created their own checklist for draft picks and it’s not working as well as we’d like. Yes we’ve had some success, but much of our potential is clogging up AAA waiting to be utilized in some way, and we have no pitching. Is Baumler even a prospect anymore? I hope Mike and Sig can adjust as necessary, because we aren’t going to be picking below 20 for the foreseeable future.
    • Didn't we blast Kikuchi last year?
    • It is nice to have a laugher.   You know what would be nicer?  For the O's win, Yankees Lose thread to get bumped.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...