Jump to content

Dick Bleier, your new favorite reliever


Rene88

Recommended Posts

Wonder what the cutoff for salary is for the new Orioles way? I'm just surprised they didn't cut him and save the $350K. Clearly Bleier will never be here when the Orioles will be good. 

Now 900K is not the $7-10 million Villar would get in arbitration, but it does beg the question of the cut off point? I can't imagine they tender Bundy now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Wonder what the cutoff for salary is for the new Orioles way? I'm just surprised they didn't cut him and save the $350K. Clearly Bleier will never be here when the Orioles will be good. 

Now 900K is not the $7-10 million Villar would get in arbitration, but it does beg the question of the cut off point? I can't imagine they tender Bundy now.

I think bringing Bleier back was to appease the season ticket holders.  ?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

Yes, in fact, Bleier was never used last year in a way that the new rule prevents.     Paul Fry was used that way 6 times.    

If were using multiple pitchers for less than 3 batters in a game we might need 20 pitchers to get through a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Wonder what the cutoff for salary is for the new Orioles way? I'm just surprised they didn't cut him and save the $350K. Clearly Bleier will never be here when the Orioles will be good. 

Now 900K is not the $7-10 million Villar would get in arbitration, but it does beg the question of the cut off point? I can't imagine they tender Bundy now.

Sure they will.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Wonder what the cutoff for salary is for the new Orioles way? I'm just surprised they didn't cut him and save the $350K. Clearly Bleier will never be here when the Orioles will be good. 

Now 900K is not the $7-10 million Villar would get in arbitration, but it does beg the question of the cut off point? I can't imagine they tender Bundy now.

Villar frees up the $$$ to sign Bundy? Elias said something about "moving around resources" NOT really a quote but to that effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

More funds available to stack up the Dominican Summer League team. 

With a  bunch of $50K guys like last year? Hopefully we will see some bump in the type of talent they sign next year now that they've been down there a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Wonder what the cutoff for salary is for the new Orioles way? I'm just surprised they didn't cut him and save the $350K. Clearly Bleier will never be here when the Orioles will be good. 

Now 900K is not the $7-10 million Villar would get in arbitration, but it does beg the question of the cut off point? I can't imagine they tender Bundy now.

They did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

With a  bunch of $50K guys like last year? Hopefully we will see some bump in the type of talent they sign next year now that they've been down there a year.

Ha yes, I was joking. I’m also hoping for an upgrade in the quality of international talent the Orioles sign in 2020. Can’t expect to be top players in the international talent pool yet, but start building up the prospect pool in the farm system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

With a  bunch of $50K guys like last year? Hopefully we will see some bump in the type of talent they sign next year now that they've been down there a year.

Could it be the $$ they just saved on Villar can now be used to spend the rest of their International cap? Isn't there a highly rated Cuban yet to sign?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/2/2019 at 7:54 PM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

More funds available to stack up the Dominican Summer League team. 

 

On 12/2/2019 at 9:07 PM, Tony-OH said:

With a  bunch of $50K guys like last year? Hopefully we will see some bump in the type of talent they sign next year now that they've been down there a year.

They did sign a few $300-400 k guys last year.     Decent progress in year 1, and I expect more progress in year 2.    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

They did sign a few $300-400 k guys last year.     Decent progress in year 1, and I expect more progress in year 2.    

I has been reported that the have spent 3 mil + this period. I don't think that included Venezuelans for some reason. I don't recall where I saw it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The issue with Cano is the classic issue with sinkerballers. Hyde let him rest far too long. There's comprehensive data out there showing that sinkerballers really suffer from too much rest.  That said, Cano is a different pitcher this year. He's throwing his 4 seamer far more this year than last (11% vs. 3%) at the expense of his sinker (48% vs. 55%) and slider (11% vs. 14%).  Another thing, his control and command is off this year. That sinker just isn't living low enough. Same goes for his changeup.  He's nearly tripled his walk rate. Cano is really good when he isn't putting runners on base for free because those groundballs that he gets from his sinker aren't likely to do damage. Now they're doing damage. 
    • I like him very much and I’m very glad we have him. I just keep spelling it wrong. Thanks for the note. I really do like him, I just have few illusions about his Cy Young chances.
    • Nice post-I would also add it's not really "conspiracy theory" stuff to entertain the thought that his plans all changed or were altered when it became apparent the Angelos family had to sell the team.   He built the wall in his own words to "attract FA pitching" and then the "take-off" quip.  Everything changed when decision to sell the team was made.  I truly believe that Elias's ST/LT plans were colored by the Angelos situation, we will a better idea of his complete plans with supportive ownership.
    • If you believe that the playoffs/World Series is a crap shot, then you should be fine with the roster as is. I don't believe that. I believe that the better your high performing talent does in the post season against the other team's best talent, the better your odds of succeeding are. I don't believe for a second that Irvin is going to magically turn into a pitcher that I would have ANY confidence winning a postseason game on the road in NY or Philly. I don't have confidence that Craig Kimbrel will go into one of those environments against those caliber of lineups/opponents and save 2/3/4 games in a 7 game series. I don't believe it's a good bet to bet on him or Cano succeeding against Soto/Judge or Turner/Harper/Realmuto/Bohm or Ohtani/Betts/Freeman with the season on the line. I just don't. But I respect your opinion if you believe the opposite.
    • Can we trade Urias/Mateo to get any decent RP help?  I am not sure but Mayo up means one of them needs to go.  Now both will need to go when Holliday comes up which i think should be in late summer.  what do i know?
    • Agreed.  ME's MO is more akin to dollar cost averaging than pushing all of his chips in on a few investments.  A lot TBD.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...