Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mondo Trasho said:

Especially if you're getting it all up front. The difference can be made up with some kind of managed investment account with any number of well known firms fairly easily.

If this year hasn't embarrassed him next year wont. Nor the next or the next.

Edited by El Gordo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Would you accept a lower amount, if your work offered you this?

Would you want to show up for the next 4 years knowing you aren't going to play? I know I would take 75 cents on the dollar to walk away . If you could. Do that you are probably not a competitor.

Davis knows he's likely done.....and I'm not contracted......when I am no longer valuable my company would let me go and my compensation would end that day. Baseball is broken 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

Would you want to show up for the next 4 years knowing you aren't going to play? I know I would take 75 cents on the dollar to walk away . If you could. Do that you are probably not a competitor.

Davis knows he's likely done.....and I'm not contracted......when I am no longer valuable my company would let me go and my compensation would end that day. Baseball is broken 

 

 

I dont share that opinion.

When it comes to providing for your family, you do what you have to do, to collect that pay check.

My previous job was changed, and while I am with the same company, I am still more than productive, just not the position that I had enjoyed, thankfully at the same wage scale, but I am keeping my mouth shut and when I can legally retire soon, I will.

I do not see the Orioles giving him a 75 cent on the dollar to walk away, its not happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Would you want to show up for the next 4 years knowing you aren't going to play? I know I would take 75 cents on the dollar to walk away . If you could. Do that you are probably not a competitor.

Davis knows he's likely done.....and I'm not contracted......when I am no longer valuable my company would let me go and my compensation would end that day. Baseball is broken 

 

 

I really doubt that Davis himself has come to that conclusion. He can always point to the 2014 season (.196 BA, etc.) and say he came back from that. Or point to a few better weeks this season as reason to hope he still has it. Buck and others will probably support the effort. Does Tillman know he's done yet?

Brooks Robinson is a model of humility and someone I revere, but take a look at the stats for his last three seasons. And he didn't even have a mega-salary to keep playing for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LA2 said:

I really doubt that Davis himself has come to that conclusion. He can always point to the 2014 season (.196 BA, etc.) and say he came back from that. Or point to a few better weeks this season as reason to hope he still has it. Buck and others will probably support the effort. Does Tillman know he's done yet?

Brooks Robinson is a model of humility and someone I revere, but take a look at the stats for his last three seasons. And he didn't even have a mega-salary to keep playing for.

Brooks had lost a lot of money due to poor investments.  He needed those paychecks and he knew he wasn't much of a player at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks continuing to play was financial even though in today's terms it wouldn't appear that way.  It is hard to believe that guys who played the game at his level frequently needed jobs after baseball to support a family.  According to baseball reference, in 1964, when Brooks won the AL MVP, his salary was $35,000.  For the year.  His last salary was $120,000 in 1977.

In contrast, Chris Davis at $21MM and change earns $130,000 every day whether the Orioles play him or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected: I thought Brooks' financial problems occured after his retirement. Nonetheless, there are, of course, countless other examples of players who held on long after they had faded.

I still think it's very possible that Davis still believes he can make a respectable comeback, just as Tillman felt he could. Additionally, he has that fantastic salary and certain people in his environment to encourage him in the wrong direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mondo Trasho said:

Especially if you're getting it all up front. The difference can be made up with some kind of managed investment account with any number of well known firms fairly easily.

Do the O's really have the liquidity to just make an $80 million payout like that up front? No idea how the Os organization works, but I would doubt that this is a realistic option; or at least not one that could be arranged without some significant internal moves. Probably would have to finance it with debt, which would mean you're just paying debt service instead of contractual payments over the next few years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, foxfield said:

Brooks continuing to play was financial even though in today's terms it wouldn't appear that way.  It is hard to believe that guys who played the game at his level frequently needed jobs after baseball to support a family.  According to baseball reference, in 1964, when Brooks won the AL MVP, his salary was $35,000.  For the year.  His last salary was $120,000 in 1977.

In 1964, the average American family had an income of $4,576.  in 1977, it was $9,779.  It's certainly not the crazy money that players make today, but professional athletes were still well paid when compared to the average worker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

In 1964, the average American family had an income of $4,576.  in 1977, it was $9,779.  It's certainly not the crazy money that players make today, but professional athletes were still well paid when compared to the average worker.

Oh sure, that is fair.  Absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NCRaven said:

In 1964, the average American family had an income of $4,576.  in 1977, it was $9,779.  It's certainly not the crazy money that players make today, but professional athletes were still well paid when compared to the average worker.

Six figures!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's what I was afraid of.  I'm sure Elias will kick the tires.  WS will be asking for package headed by one of Holliday, Mayo or Basallo.  Maybe price will come down in the offseason.
    • Suarez is probably going to have to go back to the pen. We just don’t have enough arms there to make it through the season, especially with having very few relievers who can pitch more than 1 inning. Even though Suarez has been the much better pitcher than Kremer, he gives you no length. He is the basic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher.  I guess they could try Kremer as a back end reliever given his strike out stuff and penchant for not being able to go through a lineup a third time. However, the downside to that is his susceptibility to the long ball.
    • This is Crochet's first full year back from TJS after 12 IP last year. You'd have to think if you are trading for him, it's not for this year, but next year as he's likely only got a few more starts left him if he's handled responsibly, which he should be, coming back from TJS. He's under control through the 2026 season and there is value in that even though he's arb eligible and will likely get a nice bump in salary.
    • Luzardo screams "flames out in a few years" to me. No thanks, or at least for what he'll cost. Robert has played literally one full season of baseball in his entire life. Again, too much risk and no thanks. Crochet would be a good target, because we get him for 2 1/2 years and is an elite lefty. Given where CHW are, a package with Kjerstad and one of our young pitchers (headlining) makes sense for both teams.  If we are forced to effectively give up on Mullins or Hays (either BC of injury or general suckiness), Taylor Ward does make sense. His name has been tossed around a lot. His splits playing against AL East teams kinda scare me, but he's a RH bat that can play good defensive OF and under team control for a few years and probably won't cost much. As for bullpen arms, this seems like the hardest to predict. CHW doesn't really have anybody pitching well there. The Marlins have our old friend Tanner Scott, but he isn't anything near a sure thing like other experienced closers. Mason Miller will cost too much. Chapman may make sense if DC is out. As a 36 year old rental he won't cost as much, which will be important if we go all in for a starter. His wildness will make our blood boil but he still has the swing and miss stuff and obviously a ton of playoff experience. Maybe Beeks from COL? Another lefty bullpen rental.
    • I was against the idea of a Crochet addition before the Bradish injury because I didn’t see the need. Now, I’m all for it. He would be a gamble but a much better buy than Luzardo who is not pitching well at all this season. He (Luzardo) would be the kind of non-impact move that we tried last year, that blew up in our faces.  On the other hand Robert is more of a luxury move than a need. IMO the needs are now top end starting pitcher (#2/3 type) AND shut down reliever. Anything addition beyond that is gravy. The priorities are pitching.
    • I think a RH bat is all we need offensively. I’d look at JD Martinez. 
    • How do other teams have ANY leverage? It’s not like Elias is forced to deal with them. If he was only dealing with one yea they would have leverage because the Orioles have a need on the roster. But because there are MULTIPLE with MULTIPLE players he can move on from any team and they will get nothing from us. Those other teams are incentivized to move their players JUST AS MUCH as we are incentivized to add. NOBODY is getting Westburg (or even asking for him at this point) or ANY OTHER MAINSTAY Major Leaguer of the roster. That’s not how the trade deadline works. As I mentioned nobody is going to the Yankees and saying give us Gil, Soto, Judge, Rodon, etc. Nobody is asking the Dodgers for Betts, Freeman, Ohtani, etc. Teams who are rebuilding/selling are asking for prospects. Oakland and the Chicago White Sox are not one player or even one year away. Guys who are already established now (even young ones like Jordan Westburg) do nothing for them in their phase of rebuilding.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...