Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AnythingO's said:

What a joke that he could say that when Coolbaugh said they only talked twice. After the year he had in 2017, if that counts for extra offseason work in his mind then he is delusional.

It was very satisfying to see Palmer go off on him when the news of his real offseason workouts became known.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are obviously not contending next year, and I suspect it's unlikely payroll will be raised significantly via free agency. I say just run him out there again for 162 games, he is a warm body that can fill one of the nine spots in the batting order. The salary and poor production won't be hurting anything in an already lost season.

After the 2019 season, he will have $69 million left on his deal. Much more likely to get another team to talk about eating some of the money then, with very little lost for the time in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BobDylanBundy said:

We are obviously not contending next year, and I suspect it's unlikely payroll will be raised significantly via free agency. I say just run him out there again for 162 games, he is a warm body that can fill one of the nine spots in the batting order. The salary and poor production won't be hurting anything in an already lost season.

After the 2019 season, he will have $69 million left on his deal. Much more likely to get another team to talk about eating some of the money then, with very little lost for the time in between.

With Davis, Trumbo and Mancini you have three bodies for two spots in the batting order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, foxfield said:

But I'd be working very hard to make sure that Boras was more motivated to have this one go away.  Or maybe Boras likes the idea of talking to owners about the time he got an owner to overpay for a used up player.

On the flip side, Boras outsmarted a Major League team into paying $161 million for a player who already had two violations for cheating. It's one thing to get a player a contract they deserve. The Chris Davis contract is an example of Boras getting a player much, much more than they deserved. His job is to get the best deal for his client: mission accomplished. I'm not sure he wants this to be forgotten at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

With Davis, Trumbo and Mancini you have three bodies for two spots in the batting order.

1B, DH, and LF. I doubt the O's are seriously looking at Diaz/Hays to make an immediate jump to the Majors for RF, let alone have both of them starting at the corners. There's also minimal incentive to rush them, and service time is an excellent reason to make them earn a promotion (which neither have done yet).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BobDylanBundy said:

On the flip side, Boras outsmarted a Major League team into paying $161 million for a player who already had two violations for cheating. It's one thing to get a player a contract they deserve. The Chris Davis contract is an example of Boras getting a player much, much more than they deserved. His job is to get the best deal for his client: mission accomplished. I'm not sure he wants this to be forgotten at all.

It’s time for a third violation of the substance abuse policy.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BobDylanBundy said:

1B, DH, and LF. I doubt the O's are seriously looking at Diaz/Hays to make an immediate jump to the Majors for RF, let alone have both of them starting at the corners. There's also minimal incentive to rush them, and service time is an excellent reason to make them earn a promotion (which neither have done yet).

You said 162 games.  That's all season.

You don't think one of Stewart, Diaz, Hays or McKenna will be ready at any point next season?  Heck let's add Mountcastle to that list.

Plus putting one of those three in the outfield hurts the defense and therefor the pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BobDylanBundy said:

On the flip side, Boras outsmarted a Major League team into paying $161 million for a player who already had two violations for cheating. It's one thing to get a player a contract they deserve. The Chris Davis contract is an example of Boras getting a player much, much more than they deserved. His job is to get the best deal for his client: mission accomplished. I'm not sure he wants this to be forgotten at all.

Exactly.  This is all on the Orioles.  And is one of Boras' crowning achievements. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, foxfield said:

First of all I make sure I mention Scott Boras every day that I put Chris Davis in the lineup.  Every day.  Scott Boras' name is attached to one of the worst signings in MLB history.  Then, if Im the Orioles I trot him out there every day until May of next year.  If he doesn't improve...and he wont.  I stick him in the bull pen and for two years I throw him every day.  I have no doubt that if Davis can't hit..play the field or pitch, he and Boras might be more than slightly motivated to go away. 

I don't begrudge Davis.  The Orioles are the ones who goofed here.  But I'd be working very hard to make sure that Boras was more motivated to have this one go away.  Or maybe Boras likes the idea of talking to owners about the time he got an owner to overpay for a used up player.

Davis might be a better reliever than a position player.  He was great in limited action.  LOOGY/mop up man?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TonySoprano said:

Here is exactly the last two calendar years for Chris Davis 9/2/16 - 9/2/18

270 G, 983 ABs, 48 HRs, 121 RBI,  .199/.286/.376/.652
I'm reminded of the famous words of "Dirty Harry" Callahan

 

Davis just stretched out 1 year of the production the O;s paid for over 2 years.  48 HR/121 RBI sounds pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dark Helmet said:

Trumbo atleast wasn't completely incompetent with the bat this year.

True,but he has one year left. I would rather invest in Davis and hope a miracle happens than let Trumbo suck up at- bats for an awful team for no good reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baltfan said:

True,but he has one year left. I would rather invest in Davis and hope a miracle happens than let Trumbo suck up at- bats for an awful team for no good reason. 

If not for the knee surgery, Trumbo was a trade candidate I believe this winter. He was on pace for around 25 HR. A team looking to not invest a long-term contract for some pop at DH. A team like Oakland maybe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • If we don't want to trade one of our big three (or four?) prospects, then focusing on bad contracts or rentals is our only option to salvage this season.  Better to do that than to do nothing.  If we only do rentals, we'll need to add one or more starters over the offseason through free agency.  If Rubinstein has told Elias that he's willing to spend in free agency, then that reduces Elias' need to get a starter who is controllable beyond this year.  
    • That STRK column in the standings is very persuasive.  Look elsewhere and you'll see that in spite of the L5 they still have the top run differential in the AL and are closer to the East lead than they were a week ago. 
    • This is a mix of hitting two really hot teams, our pitching attrition, and just some bad luck. Everything is not going their way right now.  Sure, I think the rotation needs some help after losing Bradish, Means, Wells and Kremer and yes, Elias should have done more this offseason to sure up this pen (I was saying that all offseason and through spring), but when the team pitches good it doesn't hit and when they score a bunch, their pitching stinks.  This team was not going to continue on a 105-win pace with their pitching injuries, but luckily, the Yankees have not been playing great either after being lights out for awhile (while the Orioles were red-hot).  No this team is not going to go into a giant tailspin where they end up under .500 and yes, they will eventually break out of this. We saw in the schedule this was a tough stretch of opponents and lack of off days and it's just kind of caught up just as they hot two teams getting hot.  They're going to be fine when it comes to making the playoffs. Now, do they have a deep playoff caliber rotation and bullpen? No, I think they need to make moves, move that are going cost some players people don't want to see go, but when you have never drafted and developed a major league pitcher in 5 years of drafting, this is what your strategy was devised for.  Develop the bats, trade/acquire for the arms. Now it's time to see if Elias is able to fulfill his strategy.
    • Not addressing the bullpen other than a stopgap closer in the offseason is kinda coming home to roost now. Doesn't help that Cano and Perez haven't been very good either. The rotation has just been pure bad luck. When your 2/4/5 plus Wells are gone, sooner or later you are going to feel it. Irvin and Suarez have pitched above expectations but you gotta assume they are going to settle into mid-4 ERAs sooner or later. No idea what the front office is going to do by the deadline. It's a sellers market it seems. I will say I hope major moves are made between now and the start of the 25 season, because it is pee or get off the pot with a lot of these guys on the farm.  And if Burnes isn't back, there is a TON of pitching that needs to be added.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...