Jump to content

The most exciting 15.7 seconds in years


Frobby

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t think the bobble would have mattered that much.  He went in standing up.

The idea of it being a single and 3 base error is interesting though.  If the CFer makes the catch, we talk about what a great catch it would have been.  But if he misses it, it’s an error in judgment and therefore Hays should get penalized for it.

Tough call there.  I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to the hitter there.  He hit that ball almost 107MPH and while it was a poor decision for the CFer to make, he didn’t touch it and Hays just ran hard.

I think an error should have been recorded on the play.  The outfielder wasn't close to making the play, it was a clear lapse in judgement to even attempt it.  But that is hardly ever called and I'm sure Hays much prefers the HR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Welp, Diaz hasn't made his entry into O's lore yet but Hays just garnered a place in our hearts.  We are definitely "pesky" as this 2020 SSS suggests.  And @Frobby, how about that steal of home attempt?  

Let's talk about that! I thought that was a fascinating play. Even though it didn't work out, it said a few things about the 2020 O's:

1) Chris Davis, you are on notice. The team has no faith in your ability to get a big hit. You are not special. We will find other ways to score when you are up, even at great risk of losing your bat  (That said, as a result of the play he ended up leading off against a RHP and drew a big walk). 

2) Say what you will about the front office strategy, the players on the field are trying to win.  

3) Even when things don't work, they keep playing.

4) If the players or coaches pick up on something, they have the green light to go for it. Would be interesting to know who saw what and whether this was practiced. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moshagge3 said:

It's funny that the official scorer who was so generous with Hays gave Chris Davis an error on Jay Bruce's hard grounder. If Bruce had been given credit for a double, he would have hit for the cycle. 

Nah, he never had a triple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think an error should have been recorded on the play.  The outfielder wasn't close to making the play, it was a clear lapse in judgement to even attempt it.  But that is hardly ever called and I'm sure Hays much prefers the HR.

I've never seen a play like that called an error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Number5 said:

I've never seen a play like that called an error.

Diving and missing was not an error. I thought one could have been called either when he slipped getting the throw off or on the infielder missing the cutoff, but it was tough to see from the replay where Hays was on the bases at that point. Seemed like the OF recovered and got to the ball quickly enough to keep it to a triple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Diving and missing was not an error. I thought one could have been called either when he slipped getting the throw off or on the infielder missing the cutoff, but it was tough to see from the replay where Hays was on the bases at that point. Seemed like the OF recovered and got to the ball quickly enough to keep it to a triple.

Had Hays slowed down at all coming into and rounding third, I could see a triple and an error being called.  But he didn't slow down until he was almost to the plate and there was obviously no play being made.  HR all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Diving and missing was not an error. I thought one could have been called either when he slipped getting the throw off or on the infielder missing the cutoff, but it was tough to see from the replay where Hays was on the bases at that point. Seemed like the OF recovered and got to the ball quickly enough to keep it to a triple.

I'm of the mind that if you dive for a ball you have no chance for instead of pulling up and fielding the ball on a bounce it should count as an error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm of the mind that if you dive for a ball you have no chance for instead of pulling up and fielding the ball on a bounce it should count as an error.

Mental mistakes aren't officially scored as errors.  The physical is scored, not the mental.  Was it foolish?  Yes, but you're just not going to see those plays scored as errors.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Number5 said:

Mental mistakes aren't officially scored as errors.  The physical is scored, not the mental.  Was it foolish?  Yes, but you're just not going to see those plays scored as errors.

Doesn't change the fact that I think it should.  He had no chance at that ball.  That play was all risk no reward. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm of the mind that if you dive for a ball you have no chance for instead of pulling up and fielding the ball on a bounce it should count as an error.

It was definitely not a good play! By the current rules/norms regarding error scoring, it was not an Error. Hopefully it got counted as negative dWAR/DRS. 

The popup was an even worse play but was more of a miscommunication than an "error". Still, Segura did call for it and go for it. Again, terrible play, worse than many actual scored Errors, but I guess not an Error as they are defined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...