Jump to content

Can Means become the Orioles’ version of Kuechel?


Obando

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Obando said:

Both were never highly rated prospects in their respective systems, but worked their way up the ladder, made it to the majors, and in the case of Kuechel, has had a ton of success despite lacking dominant stuff. Both are lefties that have good control/command and great changeups, and so far from what I’ve seen from Means, he’s not scared out on the mound.  He has some moxie and poise, just like Kuechel.  I love how he stood up to Yandy Diaz after he threw up and in on him, Yandy shot him a dirty look, and Means said “What are you looking at?” to him with a serious face.  Then Means proceeded to strike him out on the next pitch.  It was a thing of beauty!

Kuechel ended up becoming a major part of the Astros’ success during their rebuild, and the Orioles are in the early stages of their rebuild right now.  Maybe I’m just excited after watching Means close out this game against the Rays, but in general, I’ve been very impressed with him so far this season.

If the Orioles have any luck at all, Means will become that unexpected top of the rotation type of starter that the Astros ended up getting with Kuechel unexpectedly.  I’m not suggesting Means will win 20 games and become a Cy Young winner, but I don’t see any reason why he can’t become a staple of the rotation for many years to come based on what he’s shown me so far.

I hope he does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2019 at 11:42 PM, Obando said:

 

Both were never highly rated prospects in their respective systems, but worked their way up the ladder, made it to the Majors, and in the case of Kuechel, has had a ton of success despite lacking dominant stuff. Both are lefties that have good control/command and great change-ups, and so far from what Ive seen from Means, hes not scared out on the mound. He has some moxie and poise, just like Kuechel. I love how he stood up to Yandy Diaz after he threw up and in on him ....... Yandy shot him a dirty look, and Means said What are you looking at? to him with a serious face. Then Means proceeded to strike him out on the next pitch. It was a thing of beauty !!!

Kuechel ended up becoming a major part of the Astros success during their rebuild, and the Orioles are in the early stages of their rebuild right now.  Maybe Im just excited after watching Means close out this game against the D-Rays, but in general, Ive been very impressed with him so far this season.

If the Orioles have any luck at all, Means will become that unexpected top-of-the-rotation type of starter that the Astros ended up getting with Kuechel unexpectedly. Im not suggesting that Means will win 20 games and become a Cy Young winner, but I dont see any reason why he cant become a staple of the rotation for many years to come, based on what hes shown me so far.

 

o

 

John Means has Provided a Blueprint for Success for Orioles Pitchers

(By Nick Cicere)

https://www.camdenchat.com/2019/4/23/18511818/john-means-orioles-changeup-2019

 

o

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2019 at 11:42 PM, Obando said:

 

Both were never highly rated prospects in their respective systems, but worked their way up the ladder, made it to the Majors, and in the case of Kuechel, has had a ton of success despite lacking dominant stuff. Both are lefties that have good control/command and great change-ups, and so far from what Ive seen from Means, hes not scared out on the mound. He has some moxie and poise, just like Kuechel. I love how he stood up to Yandy Diaz after he threw up and in on him ....... Yandy shot him a dirty look, and Means said What are you looking at? to him with a serious face. Then Means proceeded to strike him out on the next pitch. It was a thing of beauty !!!

Kuechel ended up becoming a major part of the Astros success during their rebuild, and the Orioles are in the early stages of their rebuild right now.  Maybe Im just excited after watching Means close out this game against the D-Rays, but in general, Ive been very impressed with him so far this season.

If the Orioles have any luck at all, Means will become that unexpected top-of-the-rotation type of starter that the Astros ended up getting with Kuechel unexpectedly. Im not suggesting that Means will win 20 games and become a Cy Young winner, but I dont see any reason why he cant become a staple of the rotation for many years to come, based on what hes shown me so far.

 

 

 

2 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

John Means has Provided a Blueprint for Success for Orioles Pitchers

(By Nick Cicere)

https://www.camdenchat.com/2019/4/23/18511818/john-means-orioles-changeup-2019

 

o

o

 

Happy 26tBIRTHDAY , John Alan Means (originally cited by bobmc in today's game thread.)

 

 

2002731.jpg

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

5 innings of 1-run ball shot Means' ERA up from 1.72 to 1.74.

 

 

15 OUTS: 6 Strikeouts, 4 Groundouts, 4 Flyouts, 1 Foulout

 

JOHN ALAN MEANS )))))) (vs. WHITE SOX, 4/24)

IP:lll5

H:llll 4 )l (1 Double, 3 Singles) 

R:lllll 1

BB:lll)l

SO:lll6

Pitches: ll)92 )(56 )Strikes, )36 )Balls)

2019 ERA: ))1.74  ))  20.67 IP  (4 ER) 

2019 WHIP: ))1.113  ))  20.67 IP  (23 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )).221 ) (17 for 77) 18 for 94

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*************************

25 ll(15 llStrikes, l10 llllBalls)

14 lll(81 llStrikes, lll61 lllBalls)

19 lll(12 llStrikes, lll71 lllBalls)

15 lll(10 llStrikes, lll51 lllBalls)

19 lll(11 llStrikes, lll81 lllBalls)

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/19/2019 at 6:38 AM, Redskins Rick said:

It was indeed.

Palmer was once quoted that Stu Miller of the Orioles had the best change up in all of baseball. His delivery was so deceptive it kept the hitters fooled.

And he had three speeds: slow, slower, and slowest. All things of beauty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His breaking ball isn't great, but I thought it looked at least average a couple times he offered it up. About 80% of the time it was pretty bad, but he had a couple good ones. Control looks pretty good. FB velocity definitely playable and his control is pretty good too. If he can throw a breaking pitch for a strike, we might have a pretty solid starter on our hands. 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bubble Buddy said:

His breaking ball isn't great, but I thought it looked at least average a couple times he offered it up. About 80% of the time it was pretty bad, but he had a couple good ones. Control looks pretty good. FB velocity definitely playable and his control is pretty good too. If he can throw a breaking pitch for a strike, we might have a pretty solid starter on our hands. 

On a radio interview on The Scott Garceau Show on 105.7 The Fan, Brandon Hyde said Means is feeling more confident and so starting to add his "get me over" breaking ball into his mix so that the batters couldn't just sit on either his fastball or changeup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When asked on my radio spot last week what players on the current 25-man roster could be part of a winning future here, I named John Means and Renato Nunez. that should tell you what I think of his new changeup. Saying that, I like that he used his slider a bit more today. I'd like to see him have that pitch as well to go to at times, especially against lefties.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

When asked on my radio spot last week what players on the current 25-man roster could be part of a winning future here, I named John Means and Renato Nunez. that should tell you what I think of his new changeup. Saying that, I like that he used his slider a bit more today. I'd like to see him have that pitch as well to go to at times, especially against lefties.

Credit where credit is due. I may be mis-remembering, but I believe it was you that was pro-Means last year and felt he had a real shot to be a solid big league contributor. Well done. We all hope he continues his early success.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...