Jump to content

Can Means become the Orioles’ version of Kuechel?


Obando

Recommended Posts

I'm liking Means' demeanor on the mound. Looks real confident in his abilities. 

I've got a question though. Sorry if it's been asked already. Assuming he continues this way do the Orioles limit his innings for the season? I know he's pitched some pretty full minor league seasons already. Just wondering if there's risk of injury in subsequent seasons should they let him pitch until end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, byrdz said:

I'm liking Means' demeanor on the mound. Looks real confident in his abilities. 

I've got a question though. Sorry if it's been asked already. Assuming he continues this way do the Orioles limit his innings for the season? I know he's pitched some pretty full minor league seasons already. Just wondering if there's risk of injury in subsequent seasons should they let him pitch until end of the season.

The nice thing about 91 mph fastballs and 30% change ups is that they are pretty easy on the arm.  But I would guess so.  Practically every team ships every pitcher for a vacation stay on the IL at some point during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, byrdz said:

I'm liking Means' demeanor on the mound. Looks real confident in his abilities. 

I've got a question though. Sorry if it's been asked already. Assuming he continues this way do the Orioles limit his innings for the season? I know he's pitched some pretty full minor league seasons already. Just wondering if there's risk of injury in subsequent seasons should they let him pitch until end of the season.

I doubt it’s much of a concern.    He threw 157 innings last year.   He’s on pace for 151 right now.   If he gets to a point where it looks like he might exceed 180, maybe you’d look at it.    I’d be thrilled to have that scenario arise.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

My apologies, for missing your earlier post.

It’s ok, @Can_of_corn has been picking on me & after my wife left me for my sister, I thought I had hit rock bottom, but then I saw you stealing my posts & I began to wonder if there was anything sacred in this world anymore. It’s been a rough day. 

That Paddack change is a unique looking pitch, that’s as good a change as I’ve seen that finishes within the zone, filthy. Before games began yesterday I decided to watch his start v Seattle & I had to load up on Paddy in dfs; unfortunately, I did not make as prudent a move in fading Cy Means. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hallas said:

It's pretty spectacular for him to gain almost 2 and a half ticks on his heater.  He touches 95 now apparently?  If he did that earlier in his career he would have been a top prospect.

Per BrooksBaseball, he topped out at 95.2 in one appearance, but the rest have been under 95 (including one 94.9 and one 94.7, the rest in the 93.6-94.3 range for the top).    Last year’s OH scouting report said he sits 90-92, can touch 93-94 on occasion.   For me, the development of his change-up is the big difference this year, more than any velocity increase.  Not that I’m complaining about getting a velocity bump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Per BrooksBaseball, he topped out at 95.2 in one appearance, but the rest have been under 95 (including one 94.9 and one 94.7, the rest in the 93.6-94.3 range for the top).    Last year’s OH scouting report said he sits 90-92, can touch 93-94 on occasion.   For me, the development of his change-up is the big difference this year, more than any velocity increase.  Not that I’m complaining about getting a velocity bump.

The K% & LD% v lefties are glorious through his first 18 outs v lhb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’ll go to my grave wondering what happened to Matusz.    

As to Means, we deserve a pleasant surprise.    

Me too. The experience of watching him rise and then fall off a cliff as a starter has definitely kept me cautious about putting hopes in a young pitcher. I feel like I wait at least a year and a half before setting serious expectations. 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Two words - Brady Anderson

042812-brian-matusz-closeup.jpg

I’m not sure if you’re playing here.    Matusz’s horrible 2011 season was before he had any connection with Brady.    Then Brady tried to whip him into shape.    Didn’t work as well with Matusz as with some others, but what happened to Matusz predated Brady.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m not sure if you’re playing here.    Matusz’s horrible 2011 season was before he had any connection with Brady.    Then Brady tried to whip him into shape.    Didn’t work as well with Matusz as with some others, but what happened to Matusz predated Brady.   

Thanks!  I was joking a bit but had not dug into his stats.  I now remember that Brady was gonna fix him but that was after the decline.  I stand corrected but the Brady name on his glove was interesting to say the least.  ?  I wish, like others, that it had worked out.  He was going to be the next Cole Hamels and Hamels is still around right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m not sure if you’re playing here.    Matusz’s horrible 2011 season was before he had any connection with Brady.    Then Brady tried to whip him into shape.    Didn’t work as well with Matusz as with some others, but what happened to Matusz predated Brady.   

I'm dying on the TTTP hill.

They fiddled with his delivery, he got hurt and was never the same.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm dying on the TTTP hill.

They fiddled with his delivery, he got hurt and was never the same.

Could be.    The irony is, the best Matusz ever pitched was in the stretch after Buck arrived in August/September 2010.    He had a 5.46 ERA when Buck arrived, then 2.11 in 11 starts under Buck.    You’d have thought they would have left him alone after that.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...