Jump to content

Austin Hays 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't know though. He was in Norfolk to start, got injured, started in Frederick once healthy, then got bumped up to Bowie.

He was sent down to Frederick once he was deemed "healthy" after Extended Spring Training games. He is not on a "rehab" assignment for Norfolk or anything.

They are probably progressing him and since you don't use an option or anything when going between the minors, this was the best way.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hays went 2 for 4 with an RBI double today, and is currently hitting .288/.351/.558 since rejoining the Baysox, with 5 doubles, 3 homers and 11 RBI in 13 games.   

I’m thinking they’ll keep him at Bowie until the end of June, then promote him to Norfolk if he continues hitting well.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Hays went 2 for 4 with an RBI double today, and is currently hitting .288/.351/.558 since rejoining the Baysox, with 5 doubles, 3 homers and 11 RBI in 13 games.   

I’m thinking they’ll keep him at Bowie until the end of June, then promote him to Norfolk if he continues hitting well.    

Or call him up to the O's today, with DJ Stewart injured

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

 

Wonder if this is based on his AA performance or just because Norfolk is running out of outfielders and there aren’t any better options to promote.

I’m fine with it just expected him in Bowie a bit longer than two weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Wonder if this is based on his AA performance or just because Norfolk is running out of outfielders and there aren’t any better options to promote.

I’m fine with it just expected him in Bowie a bit longer than two weeks. 

I think the plan was to have him AAA to start the year, but due to his injury, Frederick and Bowie have been more of a "rehab assignment" than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree, except for the 'gotta find a taker for Urias'.  We should NOT refuse to improve the team just because we can't unload Urias on someone.  Sure, I'd MUCH rather trade him and get some value for him.  But if no one wants him or isn't willing to give us anything for him, I'm not keeping Mayo in the minors just because I'm not willing to cut Urias.  Trade him IF we can, cut him if we must.  But let's get Mayo's bat in the lineup.  
    • I am not sure why the Orioles would make a trade for Luzardo in the next few weeks.  Luzardo has too many question marks regarding his ability to help the Orioles this year.   Any prospects dealt in the next few weeks should for players who can get the Orioles win the World Series this year.  If they strengthen the Orioles for 2025 and beyond, great.   If the Marlins will give up Luzardo for pennies on the dollar, then go get him.  
    • I think I may. When I originally made this post, I honestly didn’t realize he wasn’t going to be back until mid to late August. That really hurts the time frame for him to get his value up for the offseason. I mean, it could get higher imo, I’m not doubting that. But if it was at peak in the offseason and he’s 70 cents on the dollar now, how much will it go up after making 6-8 more starts? 80 cents on the dollar?  Does that increase warrant keeping him and risking that it doesn’t drop more? I don’t think the deal I offered is a slap in the face offer but I do think it’s an offer that has good but not great upside. How much you believe in Stowers and Norby obviously matters here. However, it gives them good depth, immediate ML help and several years of control.    But I could definitely see Miami wanting a better headliner and less quantity..I’m just doubtful they can get that unless they hold onto him for another year and hope he stays healthy and performs well. If he does, he can make back that trade value at that time. But, as we saw with cease, sometimes the risk just isn’t worth it and you have to take the best deal you can.  
    • We know the real answer.  Let’s see if we get it.  Lol
    • Those guys would cost who else, whos the headliner
    • Right.  SG wants to get a bargain.  Even if Luzardo’s arm falls off after the trade, he didn’t give up one player it hurts to part with.      No reason for the Marlins to sell low unless they think Luzardo never bounces back close to the 2023 level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...