Jump to content

2019 Trade Deadline


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Cashner -  The O's are going to have to eat a lot on money to trade Cashner.  But they will because if they don't eat some they will have to pay it all in salary and bonuses the rest of the season.

Signing Bonus - 3m yet to be paid.

Salary - 2.7m remaining as on July 31st.

Performance bonuses:  - Cashner is on pace for 30 starts and 167 IP.  If he keeps that pace he will earn 2.9m in performance bonuses.

That totals 8.6m that the O's have yet to pay Cashner.  

I think the O's would pay the 5.7m in signing bonus and salary to get rid of the performance bonus money if they could get a decent prospect in return.

Mancini -  I think it will take two top 100  prospects for Elias to trade Mancini at the deadline.  He is available but the price is very high because there is no pressure to sell.  He is cheap right now. I think he will stay.

Nunez -  Is on pace for 36 homers and 88 RBI.   Someone might be interested in that offense.  If someone offers as decent two way position prospect or a decent pitching prospect he is gone IMO.  His salary is cheap but the O's have other DH that can take his place.

Villar - Does score runs but is a mess on the bases and in the field.   Pretty much a 2nd division player.  He is available but I don't think the O's find a taker.

Givens and Bundy - Elias would be selling low on these two pitchers.  I don't think he gets the offers that he would accept.

So I think Cashner and maybe Nunez are traded.

 

 

 

 

I see it more likely Villar is traded than Nunez.  Villar can play Short and Second.  If a team has an injury Villar would be a good player to acquire.  Or certainly be better than their utility infielder. 

Nunez, I don't see as having any value.  A DH who has a .797 OPS and a .304 OBP isn't something a team probably doesn't already has.  I think he is the type of player a winning team would DFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 907
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 7/3/2019 at 10:57 AM, atomic said:

We don't have any sort of crunch.  We can get rid of guys like Ruiz, Nunez, Martin, Broxton, Wilkerson, Smith Jr, 3/4's of our pitching staff.  And bad players not on the 40 man roster don't get claimed in the rule 5 draft. 

Guys like Cedric Mullins, Cody Carroll and Chandler Shepard aren't even in the big leagues and are on the 40 man roster. Those guys won't be on it.

Really I can't imagine having more space on the 40 man than we do. 

 

If that's the case we might as well just do it now.  Release them all.  #freetheroster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

I see it more likely Villar is traded than Nunez.  Villar can play Short and Second.  If a team has an injury Villar would be a good player to acquire.  Or certainly be better than their utility infielder. 

Nunez, I don't see as having any value.  A DH who has a .797 OPS and a .304 OBP isn't something a team probably doesn't already has.  I think he is the type of player a winning team would DFA.

I agree Villar can play SS and 2nd base.   Its how well he plays those positions that I question. He is not exactly sure handed.   The question is that what contenders want?   Houston didn't.  The Brewers didn't.   He will have about 1.6m left on this years contract in July 31st.  That is not a huge amount for a contender but I just don't know if he measures up to be a playoff kind of player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, atomic said:

I see it more likely Villar is traded than Nunez.  Villar can play Short and Second.  If a team has an injury Villar would be a good player to acquire.  Or certainly be better than their utility infielder. 

Nunez, I don't see as having any value.  A DH who has a .797 OPS and a .304 OBP isn't something a team probably doesn't already has.  I think he is the type of player a winning team would DFA.

I think it's easy to forget that Nunez is still a young player. I know he doesn't have the prospect pedigree and may not get much better than he's showing. But he's just 25 years old in his first full season. Perhaps he could round out his game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I think it's easy to forget that Nunez is still a young player. I know he doesn't have the prospect pedigree and may not get much better than he's showing. But he's just 25 years old in his first full season. Perhaps he could round out his game. 

Contender's aren't looking for  players who could in the future be good at the trade deadline.  That is what rebuilding teams are looking for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I think it's easy to forget that Nunez is still a young player. I know he doesn't have the prospect pedigree and may not get much better than he's showing. But he's just 25 years old in his first full season. Perhaps he could round out his game. 

You can include Ruiz and Alberto in this too. It's likely that none of them become great or even good players. But they are all pretty young age and experience wise and I don't think they've been too bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, atomic said:

Contender's aren't looking for  players who could in the future be good at the trade deadline.  That is what rebuilding teams are looking for. 

I guess I'm arguing a different point (probably not quite fir for this thread) and providing a different angle to yours. I think we should hang onto him because maybe he could improve. Which is also me saying to not trade him. So I agree that he wouldn't have a lot of value as is and probably has more value for us to wait it out with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Nunez is young and cheap enough to keep.  But if someone needs a bat for the pennant race and will give Elias a A+ or AA player that projects to be better offensive and defensively or is a good pitching prospect,  I think Elias takes that deal.

Whether that deal is out there is another question.  Nunez/ as of now. is just a bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cashner - Eat some salary and get a Top 30 Organizational prospect or 2

Villar - Trade for cash, PTBNL, or intl signing money.

Mancini - I don't see much of a market.  An injury might on a contender might create a market, but I think a lot of teams want to see how he finishes 2019 to determine his real value.  If he finishes 2019 with strong numbers I would think his trade value would be way up this offseason and more likely to be deal then.

Givens - Pitching much better of late. Good K numbers.  Limiting hits.  Been phenomenal away from Camden Yards.  I do believe there is a market for him.  I think he gets traded as he would be a good 7th inning guy for a contender.  Two or three top 30 organizational prospects should do it.

Bundy -  I don't see a market for him as he is average at best right now.  Personally, I would move him to closer next season if we do move Givens along.  See if you can reestablish some trade value that way while potentially improving the back end of the bullpen.  This could lead to an uptick in velo and compliment his already decent K numbers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Cashner - Eat some salary and get a Top 30 Organizational prospect or 2

Villar - Trade for cash, PTBNL, or intl signing money.

Mancini - I don't see much of a market.  An injury might on a contender might create a market, but I think a lot of teams want to see how he finishes 2019 to determine his real value.  If he finishes 2019 with strong numbers I would think his trade value would be way up this offseason and more likely to be deal then.

Givens - Pitching much better of late. Good K numbers.  Limiting hits.  Been phenomenal away from Camden Yards.  I do believe there is a market for him.  I think he gets traded as he would be a good 7th inning guy for a contender.  Two or three top 30 organizational prospects should do it.

Bundy -  I don't see a market for him as he is average at best right now.  Personally, I would move him to closer next season if we do move Givens along.  See if you can reestablish some trade value that way while potentially improving the back end of the bullpen.  This could lead to an uptick in velo and compliment his already decent K numbers.

 

I do not think there is any uptick in velo waiting on Dylan Bundy or he would have shown it...and he is not closer material at all imho.  His HR rate is 1.7 per nine innings...most closers are half that or better...yes, his K rate is 9/9 innings but someone, say like Chapman is 14.9 ...even Givens is 13/9 innings.   And he still walks way too many because he has no out pitch.   He is a back end starter and that is what he is, imho. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Cashner - Eat some salary and get a Top 30 Organizational prospect or 2

Villar - Trade for cash, PTBNL, or intl signing money.

Mancini - I don't see much of a market.  An injury might on a contender might create a market, but I think a lot of teams want to see how he finishes 2019 to determine his real value.  If he finishes 2019 with strong numbers I would think his trade value would be way up this offseason and more likely to be deal then.

Givens - Pitching much better of late. Good K numbers.  Limiting hits.  Been phenomenal away from Camden Yards.  I do believe there is a market for him.  I think he gets traded as he would be a good 7th inning guy for a contender.  Two or three top 30 organizational prospects should do it.

Bundy -  I don't see a market for him as he is average at best right now.  Personally, I would move him to closer next season if we do move Givens along.  See if you can reestablish some trade value that way while potentially improving the back end of the bullpen.  This could lead to an uptick in velo and compliment his already decent K numbers.

 

In your scenario I would just keep Villar. I think you are really undervaluing him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Cashner - Eat some salary and get a Top 30 Organizational prospect or 2

Villar - Trade for cash, PTBNL, or intl signing money.

Mancini - I don't see much of a market.  An injury might on a contender might create a market, but I think a lot of teams want to see how he finishes 2019 to determine his real value.  If he finishes 2019 with strong numbers I would think his trade value would be way up this offseason and more likely to be deal then.

Givens - Pitching much better of late. Good K numbers.  Limiting hits.  Been phenomenal away from Camden Yards.  I do believe there is a market for him.  I think he gets traded as he would be a good 7th inning guy for a contender.  Two or three top 30 organizational prospects should do it.

Bundy -  I don't see a market for him as he is average at best right now.  Personally, I would move him to closer next season if we do move Givens along.  See if you can reestablish some trade value that way while potentially improving the back end of the bullpen.  This could lead to an uptick in velo and compliment his already decent K numbers.

 

If the O's eat some salary, I think we could all be quite surprised by what the O's could get for Cashner. Bumgarner and Stroman will likely be the big names - but Cashner could bring back something decent from a team who misses out on those two.

I can't see much of a market for Villar. He maybe gets traded for slot money if the O's don't play to pay him in arbitration next year. I can't see a team offering much for Bundy.

Mancini is obviously a good player, but I can't really see a team giving up much for him - just because there are so many players like him.

Givens is a question mark, I think it depends on how he pitches the rest of the month. But, the market is pretty flooded for relief pitchers this deadline: Will Smith, Tony Watson, Jake Diekman, Ken Giles, Sam Dyson, Shane Green, Alex Colome.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

I do not think there is any uptick in velo waiting on Dylan Bundy or he would have shown it...and he is not closer material at all imho.  His HR rate is 1.7 per nine innings...most closers are half that or better...yes, his K rate is 9/9 innings but someone, say like Chapman is 14.9 ...even Givens is 13/9 innings.   And he still walks way too many because he has no out pitch.   He is a back end starter and that is what he is, imho. 

 

 

Yeah, I think Bundy is a 4th starter. Which certainly has value to a team needing a backend starter. What does that get you at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

What did the O's get out of last season's fire sale?  A wounded Yusniel Diaz that is underperforming this year and............. what?

Different decision maker. Haven’t you been paying attention? Plus it’s not a fire sale. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Hamilton needs to really improve on coverage of TEs.
    • Some quick recaps of the matchups against KC, as they happened so long ago that they’re genuinely tough to remember. Game 1 (@BAL): Orioles win 6-4.  Dean Kremer vs. Michael (Wacha) Wacha. Kremer escapes a brutal 1st inning with two errors (Urias; Henderson). After that, the pitchers mostly cruise until T3, when Kremer gives up a bomb to Witt, followed by a walk and a Perez bomb for a 3-0 KC lead. The O’s bats storm back, matching those 3 runs in B4, with Rutschman double and a Mountcastle HR providing the highlights. Not much action until T8, when Cano gets into and works out of a huge jam (2nd and 3rd, none out) to preserve the tie. In B8, three singles culminate in a Mountcastle RBI to take the lead. Kimbrel promptly blows said lead in T9, giving up a single to Isbel and two mostly uncontested SBs to PR Blanco, who trots home on a sac fly. In B9, Mullins singles with one out against RP Nick Anderson and Westburg sends the fans home happy with an opposite field walk-off blast.  Game 2 (@BAL): Royals win 4-1 Cole Irvin vs. Alec Marsh. Much less intrigue in this one. Irvin didn’t have it, giving up four, that could have been more. Garcia did most of the damage, with a double and triple that brought home 3 runs. Marsh mostly stymied the O’s bats, with Cowser’s double in B3 providing the only run. Smith closed it out for KC. Game 3 (@ BAL): Orioles win 4-3 Corbin Burnes vs. Cole Ragans. This one looked like it was headed the way of the visitors, as Ragans dominated through 6.1 innings of one-hit ball. The Royals had a load of traffic against Burnes, with 9 hits and a couple walks. The O’s did well to minimize the damage. Perez provided two RBI singles against Burnes, but his ponderous baserunning also kept him from scoring both times. KC added a 3rd run against Baumann in T7, on a homer by Garcia. Once Ragans finally exited, the O’s came alive, with RP James McArthur yielding two runs in B8. Cowser singled and was followed by a double from McCann. They each came home, on a Firestone by Henderson and a clutch 2-out single by Rutschman, to bring the score to 3-2. Smith again came on to close it out for KC, and he was greeted rudely. The bases were loaded for Cowser, who struck out. He was followed by McCann, however, who delivered the walk-off two-run single. Great rejoicing. Game 4 (@ KC): Royals win 9-4 Dean Kremer vs. Alec Marsh. Both guys largely matched what they’d done a couple weeks earlier. Kremer pitched into the 6th, with the only blemish until that point being a B4 solo shot by Pasquantino. Marsh pitched out of a couple jams, first picking off Henderson at 3B to snuff out a T1 2nd/3rd threat, then getting a popup from Mullins and a groundout from Cowser to escape a T4 bases loaded conundrum. B6 was a nightmare for the O’s, with Kremer getting two outs but also issuing two BBs. Akin was called on, and promptly set the whole thing ablaze, giving up RBI hits to Melendez, Massey, and Renfroe to make it 6-0. In T7, Rutschman answered with a grand slam off of possible double agent Smith to draw closer. But in B7, Melendez hit a 3-run bomb off of Tate to provide the final margin. Game 5 (@ KC): Orioles win 9-7 Corbin Burnes vs. Cole Ragans. As expected, a pitcher’s duel. Ragans came out hot, striking out the side in T1. His luck turned, though, in T2. The Orioles BABIP’d him to death, recording 8 hits in the frame. A two-run single by Westburg made it 7-0 and sent Ragans to the showers. Burnes was solid, though unspectacular, until yielding a B6 Weaver to Perez that ended his night. After the O’s manufactured a run in T7, an uncharacteristically wild outing from Coulombe was followed by a characteristically wild outing from Yohan Ramirez, with yet another big hit from Perez providing 2 RBIs to close to 8-7. Kauffman was in a frenzy. In T8, though, Mountcastle and Santander slammed back-to-back doubles off RP John Schreiber to make it 9-7. Akin and Baumann survived the bottom of the order in B8, and Kimbrel closed it out in orderly fashion in T9. Game 6 (@ KC): Orioles win 5-0  Cole Irvin vs. Seth Lugo. A mismatch on paper, and indeed it proved to be. Irvin survived B1 turmoil and then absolutely locked things down. Lugo was ambushed with back-to-back blasts from Westburg and Cowser to start T3, and then pitched his way into trouble in T6. A triple (?) by Santander was followed by a Mountcastle RBI double. Eventually RP Angel Zerpa walked in another run, but he did dodge further damage by striking out both Holliday and Henderson with the bases still loaded. Urias provided the final blow with a T9 single that drove home Henderson, and the Orioles bullpen locked down the shutout.
    • I have no hard evidence to back it up, but it seems I've observed the O's this season have adhered to a "traditional" righties vs. lefties and lefties vs. righties mentality.  Damn the reverse splits!
    • KC actually has more than 1 guy who can shut you down.
    • Not sure how you don't have a spy for Allen on 3rd and 5.
    • Let's stuff this!!! Don't jump offside.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...