Jump to content

Iglesias signs with O's


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, atomic said:

He didn’t walk much.  His stats are pretty similar to Alberto last season.  Both scored 62 runs and he had 54 RBIs to Albertos 51. Same amount of doubles.  Triples and home runs similar. 3 to 2 and 11 to 12.  20 BB to 16 BB.  
 

Also only 3 players on Orioles scored more than 62 runs last season and 1 of them is gone.

Not much at all. Last three years were 20,19 and 21 walks per season. High ever was 28 in 2016. Also does not strike out much . Most ever was last year with 70. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Philip said:

Ok fair enough. Does that mean that Martin is off to AAA? Or is there a reasonable chance they could both make it?

I think they could both make it. Like I said earlier, I could see Martin being the utility guy which might be his role at the major league level when it's all said an done. Just depends on whether Elias thinks Martin needs to play everyday in AAA or he needs to continue his development against major leauge pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, andrewochs615 said:

They are going take Torkelson.

now we know who they arent picking. :) :) :) :)

There are a few different thoughts out there on whom they will pick:

Quote

Baseball America decided to undertake that project, piecing together a prediction for the top 10 picks in next year’s draft. With the first selection, the Tigers are anticipated to take Austin Martin of Vanderbilt University.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I think Elias/Hyde put a lot of stock in defense up the middle.

I agree Elias/Hyde do value defense up the middle.   Because Wilkerson can backup the outfield plus 2B, 3B and 1B he would be consider a utility player.   Valaika can backup SS/2B/3B.  Also a utility  player.   I think the O's will have room for both.

Valaika is strong defensively at 2B/SS.   Wilkerson has good range at 2B where he played most of the time in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always fun to see a guy that was talked about over and over sign with the club.  Certainly not the most exciting player, but a solid defensive SS will be nice to have and it's good to see a little money tossed if/when needed (not that I had my doubts, but clearly many do).

While I don't want to compare to Villar directly, the 2/3 cost savings for the ~1/2 war replacement is fine for a tanking/rebuilding club.  With more value being on the defensive side of things, I do like the idea of our pitchers getting a little more help, considering it's already hard enough pitching in our division without extra outs (whether errors or balls that just weren't cleanly fielded or moved fast enough to turn 2...)

For those of us that watch it should help a bit as well, even if only slightly.

I agree with those saying he won't be traded.  I would be rather surprised if his option isn't picked up next year.  Maybe if a prospect is ready 2021 he could go mid-season, but I doubt both the readiness at this point and the number of suitors lining up for his services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think I’d put him at 1-5 (well, maybe 5ish).     Last year he was 7-11 in the various cumulative advanced metrics, mostly 7-8.     But anyway he’s very good.  

The problem is metrics dont really get at the ingenuity and sheer talent of defense.  There are guys at SS you can just tell are operating at a different level.  Simmons, Baez...

Most metrics had Trevor Story in the top 3, and while his range is good, I am not going to say having seen the two play that he is better tha. Any of the two above or iglesias.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of like the 2021 option - it lays up for the class of 2022, and next year Oakland Semien is a likely opening as well as perhaps Cleveland if they sell Lindor as poor clubs that still aspire to competitiveness and might have more demand then.  I'd guess the Angels will have the cash to retain Andrelton if they really want.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • After going back and reading the draft day thread on Holliday,  I don't know if I would have the stomach to trade either one of those 3. I had the opportunity to watch Elijah Green this past week play in low A, and it reminded me of how fortunate it is to be an O's fan right now. 
    • 320M and they need a pitcher.  I think they wasted a dime somewhere.
    • But don't we need to get rid of the previous dogma - we need to spend when we're good to win?  It has nothing to do with Angelos or anything else along those lines.  If anything, my question is - knowing how good we are now, and having proven it, how can we maintain the guys that are still in the audition phase of the ascension to the bigs, without paying too high get some help now.  It's not like they're failing. I just think Elias might be thinking stop gap, not the main aisle deals.  I'm fine with that, but it seems like many just want him to give stuff away to get something big right now, and I don't think I agree with that - and I kind of hope Elias doesn't either, to be honest. Rubes will spend money, but after Angelos, it still won't be enough for some.  He doesn't need to prove he will by signing off on the trade of a top player/prospect.  I would be completely satisfied with an announcement that they had reached a long term agreement with Adley or Gunnar right now.  But I'm not waiting for Rubes to prove himself and trust that all I've seen from him so far is that he will differentiate himself from the previous ownership in a meaningful and real way - like he already has, in some ways, when his and the team's time is right.
    • It would be Basallo for me, but the upside is so massive that voting for him makes me cringe. It's pretty simple: Don't. Trade. Any. Of. Them. 
    • I think the Tigers would run to the phone to call the commissioners office if they could get Holliday for Skubal
    • I'm sure Dodger fans aren't like that.  I expect they're like Yankee fans and would like to buy/trade for all the best players.  Dodgers are actually way scarier to compete against than the Yankees they are probably the wealthiest team in the majors and run like a small market franchise in that they are trying to exploit market inefficiencies and never waste a dime.
    • I disagree with all possible votes, it is slanted. The O’s are stacked and it’s likely they add a piece or two. If this was the Dodgers, we would be hailing the off-season moves and pushing for the next big move. And the Orioles keep winning, better!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...